Kim Jaym Il Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Didn't Tetris say in the other thread they wouldn't call in allies? Let's see how that goes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TECUMSEH Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Ave Legion. Tetris deserves this in a big way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1317686349' post='2815017'] It looks to me that nobody is discussing the reasons for the war. it looks to me that Legion has all the right in this one. Supporting tetris is pretty unfaiir. Added: I understand that legion is disliked and people like to make fun of them, but the point above is still valid. [/quote] If you are an ally of Tetris, your support of them being fair or unfair is moot. Treaties dont say "Mutual defense unless you mess up." Mutual Defense, is mutual defense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pezstar Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1317686349' post='2815017'] It looks to me that nobody is discussing the reasons for the war. it looks to me that Legion has all the right in this one. Supporting tetris is pretty unfaiir. Added: I understand that legion is disliked and people like to make fun of them, but the point above is still valid. [/quote] I agree with you. For the first time in a very long time, someone has a thoroughly valid cause for war, and rather than getting praised for their actions in defending themselves, the derp squad is out in full force, mocking them. Tetris actually deserves to be raked over the coals for this one, but because it is currently fashionable to mock Legion (well, ok, that's been fashionable for years now), they are being mocked for doing exactly as every one of us would have done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kzoppistan Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 (edited) [center][img]http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q17/otingocni/leg3.jpg[/img] A glorious day for battle.[/center] Edited October 4, 2011 by Kzoppistan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Dajobo' timestamp='1317686631' post='2815026'] I'm sure some people will support Tetris. To do so though would be an unambiguous support of spying, so it will be interesting to see who. o/ Legion [/quote] I'm hoping some people will support Legion too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Dajobo' timestamp='1317686631' post='2815026'] I'm sure some people will support Tetris. To do so though would be an unambiguous support of spying, so it will be interesting to see who. o/ Legion [/quote] Once again, treaties dont say "we dont defend you if you do something stupid." Just because it worked with UINE for you, doesnt mean, and thankfully so, that we all abandon allies for a bad choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gingervites Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 hey Legion [img]http://www.imageviper.com/displayimage/142750/0/Its_A_Trap_Star_Wars.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Wilson Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1317686349' post='2815017'] It looks to me that nobody is discussing the reasons for the war. it looks to me that Legion has all the right in this one. Supporting tetris is pretty unfaiir. Added: I understand that legion is disliked and people like to make fun of them, but the point above is still valid. [/quote] And yet, Tetris will be supported for the sole purpose of escalating the war... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT Jag Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Dajobo' timestamp='1317686631' post='2815026'] I'm sure some people will support Tetris. To do so though would be an unambiguous support of spying, so it will be interesting to see who. o/ Legion [/quote]It would be unambiguous support of an ally being attacked. Some people don't subscribe to the new definition of non-chaining. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster83 Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Joe Stupid' timestamp='1317686210' post='2815012'] This was stupid. I'm sure you'll regret this. [/quote] Heh. The CB is unquestionable. Legion are doing the right thing by standing up for themselves... and that is not something to regret - whatever the outcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janax Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='King Louis the II' timestamp='1317686349' post='2815017'] It looks to me that nobody is discussing the reasons for the war. it looks to me that Legion has all the right in this one. Supporting tetris is pretty unfaiir. Added: I understand that legion is disliked and people like to make fun of them, but the point above is still valid. [/quote] All is fair in love and war. This, would appear to be war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the rebel Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Interesting... Kudos to The Legion for finally standing up and finding their balls, might make people think twice about spying and taking the piss out of you in the future... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Megamind Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Rush Sykes' timestamp='1317686706' post='2815034'] If you are an ally of Tetris, your support of them being fair or unfair is moot. Treaties dont say "Mutual defense unless you mess up." Mutual Defense, is mutual defense. [/quote] Uhm, I've seen, signed and written plenty of treaties that included a clause that said defense became optional if either part was attacked due to aggressive action including espionage, so that isn't necessarily true... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormsend Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 I think the one thing Tetris should be punished for is the choice of alliances to spy on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Louis the II Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Chaoshawk' timestamp='1317686620' post='2815025'] Well, Tetris is connected to people connected to the larger factions in Bob at the moment, so I doubt many will bother to care about the reasons of war and simply want a war. Even when Legion is right it doesn't matter who is right or wrong, but who has the bigger gun or more friends to call on. [/quote] You are absolutly right. However, someone may abuse power one, two times.. But at the end, we know what happens. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomInterrupt Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='JT Jag' timestamp='1317686865' post='2815044'] It would be unambiguous support of an ally being attacked. Some people don't subscribe to the new definition of non-chaining. [/quote] That's why MADPs are so rare these days and instead we see MDoAPs. Optional Aggression clauses exist specifically so that alliances don't have to support their allies aggressive actions. Actions like Tetris has taken against The Legion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Greenberg Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 (edited) Tetris is equally as inept. Maybe worse. o/ Legion for declaring Good luck to all. Edited October 4, 2011 by Ryan Greenberg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiphosis Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 Don't think there's probably ever been a more clear cut CB - 'least not that comes to mind. Enjoy, Legion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeros Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Robster83' timestamp='1317686879' post='2815046'] Heh. The CB is unquestionable. Legion are doing the right thing by standing up for themselves... and that is not something to regret - whatever the outcome. [/quote] That my friend, depends on what you define as victory. We are all slaves to the Anarchic System in the end. Here on this blessed world we call Bob, the Strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must. The only question now is who is the strong ones here. Edited October 4, 2011 by Aeros Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JT Jag Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='Stormsend' timestamp='1317686961' post='2815050'] I think the one thing Tetris should be punished for is the choice of alliances to spy on. [/quote]Honestly. What do you have to gain from spying on Legion? Now if I were to spy on someone, I'd probably go with [b][REDACTED][/b]. They're much more critical in terms of the political environment right now, and I [i]hate[/i] them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='RandomInterrupt' timestamp='1317687087' post='2815056'] That's why MADPs are so rare these days and instead we see MDoAPs. Optional Aggression clauses exist specifically so that alliances don't have to support their allies aggressive actions. Actions like Tetris has taken against The Legion. [/quote] It all comes down to semantics though. One man's oA clause is another's Defence clause. It wouldn't be difficult for anyone to say that Tetris has been attacked and they're invoking a MDP if they were supportive of Tetris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Louis the II Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1317686904' post='2815047'] All is fair in love and war. This, would appear to be war. [/quote] Well, some things that are not fair can come back to bite you right? or you are saying that Polar's flip flop in bipolar was valid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='JT Jag' timestamp='1317687138' post='2815060'] Honestly. What do you have to gain from spying on Legion? Now if I were to spy on someone, I'd probably go with [b][REDACTED][/b]. They're much more critical in terms of the political environment right now, and I [i]hate[/i] them. [/quote] That [b][REDACTED] [/b]menace! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruhani Posted October 4, 2011 Report Share Posted October 4, 2011 [quote name='JT Jag' timestamp='1317687138' post='2815060'] Honestly. What do you have to gain from spying on Legion? Now if I were to spy on someone, I'd probably go with [b][REDACTED][/b]. They're much more critical in terms of the political environment right now, and I [i]hate[/i] them. [/quote] Lots and lots of 'LuLz'. I don't know if you have noticed, but over 80% of the things in the Cyberverse have been done solely on the basis of creating 'Lulz'. Trufax. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.