ShotgunWilly Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 (edited) Poor show, Pacifica. Poor show. Something I would've expected from Olympus or Val, but whatever... petty grudges FTW! That enough mention of Olympus and Val for ya, Keshav? Edited November 26, 2011 by ShotgunWilly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='ShotgunWilly' timestamp='1322317462' post='2852437'] Poor show, Pacifica. Poor show. Something I would've expected from Olympus or Val, but whatever... petty grudges FTW! That enough mention of Olympus and Val for ya, Keshav? [/quote] Ahh finally some recognition seems I'm finally doing my job as Emissary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorsaiwolf Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 (edited) It has been too long since we have glowed in the warmth of radioactive green skys and stacked the distorted corpses of the dead. I support this announcement. Edited November 26, 2011 by Dorsaiwolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brenann Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='Sir Keshav IV' timestamp='1322317096' post='2852434'] Why is Valhalla not mentioned or Olympus, this sucks NPO stealing our limelight [img]http://forums.cybernations.net/public/style_emoticons/default/dry.gif[/img] [/quote] You should have seen that one coming! You mention Polar AND Pacifica in a thread and you will have those with their blinders on come out of the woodwork. I am very happy to be backing our close friends in Olympus and those insane drunken Vikings in Valhalla. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabcat Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 I have to hand it to NPO, less than a year ago they were languishing at the narrow end of the treaty web about to get rolled. Now they're friends with all the cool kids. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zzzptm Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Good to see my allies in Valhalla warming up their nuclear swords. Also good to see my friends in Olympus getting the thunderbolts ready. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regent of Omerta Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 When everybody gets done posturing, let me know. All this talk of iced coffee and CB's is making me want to turn my man card in just for reading it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HalfEmpty Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Not worried about the tea and ice coffee, I'm concerned more concerned about hair dressings. I really don't want to have to get the antimacassars out, I think they are tacky, albeit homey. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khyber Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Reading this was odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NeCoHo Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 For those trying to nay say NPO's involvement in this, apart from being indirect allies of TOP, we are in fact bound to IRON through our Non Aggression Pact, signed in very early 2007 called the Cordiality Accords. Looking at it, it has wording which is in agreement with an ODAP in it also, namely the first section of Article 3. [quote]Section 1: Each alliance has the right to ask for aid, be it financial, intelligence, or military in nature, however granting such a request goes over and above any requirement.[/quote] While it does say granting any requests or offering assistance is over the requirement, it does not forbid NPO assisting IRON in any way shape or form. In a later section it also states that the document must not be "transcended by any active treaty currently upheld by either signatory." We've had this treaty since January 2007 folks, it was just made defunct by various other treaties over time, and it was never cancelled (or forced upon us to be cancelled). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grendel Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1322290154' post='2851972'] [color="#0000FF"]FAIL thanks Valhalla, NPO, and that other one for your support for our extermination of Polar. If it was not for your support our providing of this valuable service to the world would be impossible.[/color] [/quote] Thanks RV we love you too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrin Xies Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='NeCoHo' timestamp='1322335147' post='2852742']Holy crap Batman, NPO's got an oDoAP with IRON! [/quote] How you like them apples, Planet Bob? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buds The Man Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1322310407' post='2852360'] Hell yeah I am serious, if Iron and TOP are going after Polar again for BiPolar they should be after MK and Archon too, after all Archon was just as instrumental as Grub in that beatdown. [/quote] The difference is simply we had no agreements with Archon, however Grub was a full supporter of the plan and sold us out. MK didnt betray us nor did Archon, Grub did. Now repayment of the betrayal has begun. If you have any other questions hit me up in IRC or send me a PM. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MitchellBade Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1322311331' post='2852365'] New Pacific Order, the alliance equivalent of Rick Bobby. [/quote] If you ain't first, you're last. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesper Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Forged signature is forged! You should know that I always end my signature with a <3 and a *huggles*. Anyway, good stuff! \o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 [quote name='NeCoHo' timestamp='1322335147' post='2852742'] For those trying to nay say NPO's involvement in this, apart from being indirect allies of TOP, we are in fact bound to IRON through our Non Aggression Pact, signed in very early 2007 called the Cordiality Accords. Looking at it, it has wording which is in agreement with an ODAP in it also, namely the first section of Article 3. While it does say granting any requests or offering assistance is over the requirement, it does not forbid NPO assisting IRON in any way shape or form. In a later section it also states that the document must not be "transcended by any active treaty currently upheld by either signatory." We've had this treaty since January 2007 folks, it was just made defunct by various other treaties over time, and it was never cancelled (or forced upon us to be cancelled). [/quote] As awesome as this is, I still think you should have saved it for whenever you activate it in the future... now THAT would be a hell of a thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted November 26, 2011 Report Share Posted November 26, 2011 Would've been nice if certain alliances had managed to find their balls last month instead of now, but hey this is cool too I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baron Flynt Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 I used to feel kind of bad for NPO after the DH war, but I guess they're all still as opportunistic as ever. Fool me once, shame on me! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deth2munkies Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Yes, it's a curbstomp, thank you for reminding us. It's really hard to get into this conflict when you really have no stake in the revenge fantasy at its core. I guess it's kind of funny to see how much the situation has changed over the last year (that I've largely been away for). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1322310407' post='2852360'] Hell yeah I am serious, if Iron and TOP are going after Polar again for BiPolar they should be after MK and Archon too, after all Archon was just as instrumental as Grub in that beatdown. [/quote] Have some patience. It'll come all in due time. [img]http://ordoparadox.com/top/public/style_emoticons/default/mr_burns.gif[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Baron Flynt' timestamp='1322423138' post='2853919'] I used to feel kind of bad for NPO after the DH war, but I guess they're all still as opportunistic as ever. Fool me once, shame on me! [/quote] QFT. I love how they pulled up an IRON NAP they completely forgot about and tried to e-lawyer it into a oDoAP. EDIT: And if it was an oDoAP, then it was canceled due to Karma surrender terms [quote]VII. The New Pacific Order will immediately cancel and dissolve all treaties with military clauses. The New Pacific Order will not sign any new treaties without the approval of the victorious coalition until these terms end. All cancellation clauses are considered waived.[/quote] Reference: [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=63887]Click[/url] Edited November 27, 2011 by Unknown Smurf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Havamil Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 [quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1322424646' post='2853940'] QFT. I love how they pulled up an IRON NAP they completely forgot about and tried to e-lawyer it into a oDoAP. EDIT: And if it was an oDoAP, then it was canceled due to Karma surrender terms Reference: [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=63887]Click[/url] [/quote] Maybe it became one of those paperless treaties that were so popular for awhile? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 [quote name='Havamil' timestamp='1322425366' post='2853950'] Maybe it became one of those paperless treaties that were so popular for awhile? [/quote] Or maybe it's the IRON -> Valhalla -> Olympus -> NPO tie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 Maybe we knew our ally was going to be pulled into this (in fact allies on both sides) and we decided instead to make our own stand. Maybe we feel close enough to IRON to support them either way. It doesn't matter you knuckleheads will debate it for your own best interest and view regardless, even if the truth is SPECIFICALLY told to you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crusty Juggler Posted November 27, 2011 Report Share Posted November 27, 2011 It was always a NAP with no defense clause so it was never cancelled by the surrender terms. Both of us had forgot about it for a year or so, until we started doing some history projects and wiki updates along with renewed diplomacy early this year. However this DoS follows along Flak's flow chart more than anything else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.