D34th Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 (edited) [img]http://i56.tinypic.com/351v5lj.png[/img] [color="#008000"][b]Most Nations:[/b][/color] XX(1466) [color="#FF0000"][b]Lest Nations:[/b] [/color]PF(294) [color="#008000"][b]Biggest NS:[/b][/color] XX(47.217,28) [color="#FF0000"][b]Smallest NS:[/b][/color] PF(18386,60) [color="#008000"][b]Biggest Avg. Str:[/b][/color] PF(65,50) [color="#FF0000"][b]Smallest Avg. Str:[/b][/color] SF(32,77) [color="#008000"][b]Best Tech/Infra Ratio:[/b][/color] PF(0.54) [color="#FF0000"][b]Worst Tech/Infra Ratio:[/b][/color] Dr/Mj/CnG(0.40) [color="#008000"][b]Most Nukes:[/b][/color] XX(12.129) [color="#FF0000"][b]Lest Nukes:[/b][/color] SF(5422) [color="#008000"][b]Most WRCs:[/b][/color] PB/DH(368) [color="#FF0000"][b]Lest WRCs:[/b][/color]SF(130) ---- [b]Today I received more statistics as a present from a mysterious gopher:[/b] XX and SF share R&R, while Duckroll and MJ share Valhalla. All nations in each bloc are ranked in order of nation strength. The result is as follows: [img]http://img215.imageshack.us/img215/1402/blocchart110728.png[/img] [img]http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/1552/blocchart110728a.png[/img] [img]http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/2404/blocchart110728b.png[/img] Discuss... Edited July 30, 2011 by D34th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandwich Controversy Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 SF and MJ are much weaker than I had imagined. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 first, CnG's total NS appears wrong. Also, CnG also has a .4 tech/infra ratio which puts it with DR/Mj as worst ratio. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Glad to see something like this done. Perhaps Poseidon could be added and DH/PB be split up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted July 28, 2011 Author Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Fixed PB/DH, CnG and MJ total strength. Numbers were right but because some commas the total were wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 clearly there is no excuse to not roll Superfriends. What weaklings. (add Chestnut to SF if you want, it's MDP) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crymson Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 We are called PF, not Project Mayhem. The Project Mayhem Accords is the name of the treaty text. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Fingolfin Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 In terms of stats the blocs are fairly clearly differentiated in terms of Class A and Class B, with Class A consisting of XX and PB and Class B consisting of DR/MJ/SF/PF/C&G. Thanks for the numbers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 We are the Alpha and the Omega. PF-4-life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 We're working hard on our tech ratio Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President S O Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='James Dahl' timestamp='1311836136' post='2766021'] We're working hard on our tech ratio [/quote] Aren't we all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMuz Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 It's rather misleading that these things always put MK on PB's side. They could very well side with C&G or PF instead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KagetheSecond Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 I like how we're 200 members smaller than all the other blocs, but pretty close in NS to them. Pixels > Friends Also, where's Aztec? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Nice job Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorConcept Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='MrMuz' timestamp='1311838828' post='2766034'] It's rather misleading that these things always put MK on PB's side. They could very well side with C&G or PF instead. [/quote] Doomhouse isn't a bloc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Flinders Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='WarriorConcept' timestamp='1311853352' post='2766086'] Doomhouse isn't a bloc [/quote] Sure it is. But I'm not sure why DH and PB are just squished together. They are separate bloc, regardless of how many member they share. Also, AZTEC? Also, Mj is second in avg. nukes to Citadel 2.0. Not surprising, but pretty damn cool. Though we do have a lot of work to do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eyriq Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Nice, thanks for doing this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 I didn't know NG was the biggest alliance in PB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kriekfreak Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1311857321' post='2766108'] I didn't know NG was the biggest alliance in PB. [/quote] You do now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chief Savage Man Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='kriekfreak' timestamp='1311858735' post='2766114'] You do now. [/quote] Don't hurt me, papa! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manis B Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Synergy honorable mention for historical comparison? Maybe throw the initiative in there as well? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Captain Flinders' timestamp='1311853838' post='2766087'] Sure it is. [/quote] No it's not. Doomhouse was my bloody idea, and it was always designed to be strictly a three way treaty, not a bloc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natan Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Nice Infra/Tech ratios, other alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltus Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 Interesting. Could anyone add AZTEC? I also never got why people tie MK in with PB. They have nearly the same number of treaties with CnG. (ODN, TLR) v. (Umb, GOONS, FOK) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Earl Dumarest Posted July 28, 2011 Report Share Posted July 28, 2011 [quote name='Baltus' timestamp='1311862920' post='2766167'] Interesting. Could anyone add AZTEC? [/quote] I wouldn't be in *too* much of a rush to do that, you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.