[quote name='Schad' timestamp='1324110019' post='2880437']
If those states existed in a world where global war was -- relatively -- common, and they comprised somewhere in the range of 15% of the world's total strength, they too would be eyed pretty warily, whether or not they took an aggressive political tack.
In terms of what IR framework can be best applied to CN, while I think that offensive realism is a loathsome, near-suicidal doctrine in reality (well, post-1850 reality, at least), it does pretty much work here. Power maximization and the pursuit of the position of hegemon is the name of the game, cooperation is generally fleeting and the bonds easily broken as political units maneuver each other to best advantage, and it is very much a zero sum game in which the costs of successfully prosecuting a war are typically smaller than the gain in power experienced by the victor.
[/quote]
Destroying actors that think that power maximization is the name of the game is the name of the game post-Karma
BN is led by hegemon wannabe scum!
Really though, I think you have it backwards, bigger is better in RL, where as in this game it can lead to stagnation and competitive deficits.