Sir Humphrey Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 NATO has notified NADC of its intention to cancel the North Atlantic Compact Treaty. As per Article 5 of the treaty, the obligations of each party will expire after a period of 48 hours following this announcement. We wish our former ally all the best for the future. Signed: Sir Humphrey, Secretary General Lenny N Karl, Secretary of Foreign Affairs Tsayka, Secretary of Defense SteelersFan, Secretary of Commerce lonabis, Secretary of Enlistment AtheistRepublican, Chief Justice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiagoroth Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 We find this cancellation confusing, considering we just fought a war in their defense. The confusion is further heightened by the fact NATO wished to cancel because of other treaty obligations; other treaty obligations that didn't seem to matter much to them before the war. Nonetheless, we wish NATO well in their future endeavours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Another piece of history lost to the ages. Vaya con dios North Atlantic Compact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The R00STER Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Best luck to both parties moving forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoADarthCyfe6 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Best of luck to the both of you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mpt68 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Best of luck to both parties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 We find this cancellation confusing, considering we just fought a war in their defense. The confusion is further heightened by the fact NATO wished to cancel because of other treaty obligations; other treaty obligations that didn't seem to matter much to them before the war. Nonetheless, we wish NATO well in their future endeavours. Likely better to be handled in private. Best of luck to NATO and NADC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thom98 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 I must admit I find thing surprising myself. Best of luck moving on to both AA's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keeology Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 i'm sorry to see this happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 (edited) We find this cancellation confusing, considering we just fought a war in their defense. The confusion is further heightened by the fact NATO wished to cancel because of other treaty obligations; other treaty obligations that didn't seem to matter much to them before the war. Nonetheless, we wish NATO well in their future endeavours. The politics of dancing The politics of ooOOooohhh feelin' good The politics of moving Is this message understood [hr] Best to you both in the future! Edited April 23, 2013 by Schattenmann Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrash Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Never thought I'd see Re-Flex quoted. Good luck to both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farrin Xies Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Good luck to both parties, especially (obviously) my close friends and allies NATO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Wally Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Good luck to you both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Never thought I'd see Re-Flex quoted. Good luck to both. Bob is far better for it. Schatt's finest work in many a year. The erasure of lines in the NA zone is fascinating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Very surprised to see this. Best of luck to NADC and NATO moving forward. I have much love for you both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vom53 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 May you all go to separate paths Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conistonslim Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 So... one more hurdle cleared for the next curbstomp. DH, you guys just gotta be loiving this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverlordShinnra Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 wow. didn't see this coming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gloin Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 Interesting indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 So... one more hurdle cleared for the next curbstomp. DH, you guys just gotta be loiving this. Don't be ridiculous, NPO said everything that happened was in the past is forgotten and they will start wars from what happens from now on. There is probably a perfectly reasonable reason for an alliance to cancel on an ally who came in for them during the last recent war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jgoods45 Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 (edited) Don't be ridiculous, NPO said everything that happened was in the past is forgotten and they will start wars from what happens from now on. There is probably a perfectly reasonable reason for an alliance to cancel on an ally who came in for them during the last recent war. While that may be true for NPO, there are others who don't subscribe to that idea and for good reason too. Best wishes to all involved regardless! Edited April 23, 2013 by Jgoods45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted April 23, 2013 Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 So... one more hurdle cleared for the next curbstomp. DH, you guys just gotta be loiving this. I think you are reading a bit too much into this. Don't be ridiculous, NPO said everything that happened was in the past is forgotten and they will start wars from what happens from now on. There is probably a perfectly reasonable reason for an alliance to cancel on an ally who came in for them during the last recent war. How does what NPO said have anything to do with a decision by NATO to review and adjust its treaties? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 slurp slurpBut the question is, is he Jesus, or Judas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 So... one more hurdle cleared for the next curbstomp. DH, you guys just gotta be loiving this. If we follow this assumption to its conclusion, the North Atlantic will be doing some Treaty Organization to the effect of drop-kicking CCC, RoK, and R&R, here pretty soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farnsworth Posted April 23, 2013 Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 I guess I don't pay enough attention to get all of the implications of this, but I thought this was an old and solid relationship... so, best of luck to both moving forward. Anyway, I'm guessing China some new hegemonic power is using its economic political leverage to drive a wedge in the historically allied North Atlantic... lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts