-
Posts
4,323 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Blog Comments posted by Bob
-
-
Including just MD level treaties?
-
There is already a renewal for a third season.
-
agreed
-
You're lucky that the only thing saving your alliance is your DT protectors.
I apologize for this.
-
All members of the coalition were on board for six months of war? Maybe those involved in the planning were, but there are few alliances along the periphery who seemed all that interested (though there were quite a few people interested).
-
White Chocolate that is incorrect. The SOP for sending aid to a clearly losing alliance in a lopsided war is to wait until after the war.
-
Actually Gopher, their top nations can hit NEWs.
Remember the +/- 250 spots as well as a rule, putting them in range.
-
Good.
-High Pontiff of Auctor
-
I demand my signature be added.
-
Acti anarchies: 12Olympus Anarchies: 17If Acti is fail, Olympus must be more fail.
do you understand how nukes work
you clearly do as a 110k nation in Umb, and I suggest you use that knowledge. Olympus is double teaming people in Acti, making it so that AcTi members have two people who they can nuke each time, while Olympus can only nuke one. This means that if AcTi is active enough to launch a nuke every few days at the beginning, Olympus will have more in anarchy.
-
I keep seeing people complain about tLR complaining. However, I'm not seeing tLR complaining.
not sure how you have missed that
-
my five soldiers march with auctor
-
Can't all of NSO just join Legion, and then run for government, and then disband them?
-
no offense but I never heard of you either Bob
he was talking about your alliance not you in particular
and if you haven't heard of Ragnarok I'd be surprised.
-
You clearly don't get the concept of proper context.
-
MK losing 20 members from a war with anyone would be laughable, losing 20 members to UPN would be literally crazy, losing 20 members to some random idiot..xfd
+
-
I liked it.
-
Hearts of Iron. Superior~
-
Synth :3 learning a lot :3
Also, Bob, I think you have lost your touch as it were quite a bit lately due to this whole conflict being so goddamn close to home for you, but I can respect your opinions here and thank you and Synth for both kinda helping me understand what exactly happened to cause this all to happen.
-
This might mean a bit more if you didn't just take a list of your treaty partners and stick a "10" beside each of them.
~burn~
gopher getting feisty
-
Is it possible that Likes only stay up for a short time?
To answer quickly, no.
-
blah blah blah blah im trying to call out RnR who is clearly making their efforts to help out IRON blah blah blah
YOU TERRIBLE PEOPLE RNR HOW COULD YOU TRY TO RESOLVE IT DIPLOMATICALLY AND NOT GO TO WAR BECAUSE HAFLINGER TELLS YOU TO??
Seriously, stop. RnR isn't a bad alliance, and they are trying to help IRON. Til I see someone from IRON government state RnR isn't trying to help them, I will believe what I have been informed which is RnR is trying to help diplomatically. Let them resolve their own issues, as I hope both parties are capable of doing. Your nonsense doesn't matter, and no one agrees with it of any importance. You have bigwoody and BJ both telling you (who support IRON, to be clear) that you are wrong to do this, so why on earth would you think something like this would accomplish anything except you getting more negative attention?
-
In a not so complicated world! I call it Friends>Infra. Beside, Gre is also vastly overrated, simple cuz of the lack of numbers they had and stil has.
More then one event took place the first waves of Karma. A stupid move by IRON him self in the first wave
made sure the total damage they took in the first 2 waves ending up and cost em alot for the rest of the Karma war.
Something you can see the effects of in C&G war, where most of the core have learn from the mistake they made and dich out more
damage to pretty much the same AA´s setup. The larger difference here is, In the C&G war, We all know its gone be a loooong war that will cost both the winner and the losers alot in the end. 2:nd Who will win or lose, Was not set in stone. More events took place even in the C&G war.
No. You are wrong.
GRE was not overrated due to their "lack of numbers", that's simply ridiculous. They were rated right where they should have been last war. This war, I would agree on the lack of activity making them overrated, but numbers means quite simply nothing in terms of how you fight. In fact, a smaller alliance like GRE that is highly selective typically does better in conflict (see MK, TOP, Umbrella, PC, etccccc).
-
lol, half the time its the people in your alliance or your CnG partners.
you are a quite sad person when you fail to realize ours is just humor, whereas a name like this is entirely serious.
Rush's thoughts on various alliances.... Wartime edition....
in Rush Sykes' Blog
A blog by Rush Sykes in General
Posted
That isn't why. Its because you say things like this.
On paper, MI6 is a good alliance. In practice, who knows what happened. Still have love for my friends over there, but its hard to take MI6 seriously.