Jump to content

Penkala

Members
  • Content Count

    2,598
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Penkala

  • Rank
    I love being STRONG

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Penkalaland
  • Alliance Name
    Umbrella App
  • Resource 1
    Cattle
  • Resource 2
    Sugar

Recent Profile Visitors

1,295 profile views
  1. Welcome back or something.

  2. So basically what your side is saying is that you give up and that we win the game? Awesome.
  3. I know you're just trolling and all, but with a highly advanced military like the U.S. has, most of the work is maintenance. At any given time, roughly half of our ships are under maintenance. Aircraft take multiple hours of maintenance for every hour of flight time even if nothing breaks. Most countries don't HAVE to have many because WE have them. For example, Japan doesn't need 3 or 4 carriers because we have them. Aircraft carriers (along with the support ships) bring resources to bear and so it's not that odd to see one helping out Japan. As for having a presence in world affairs, that's what we do. We project power throughout the world to safeguard American (and allied) interests. We also conduct military operations fairly regularly with the same goal -- from bombings like you've seen recently in Libya to special operations missions you'll never hear about. It's what we do. Deal with it.
  4. That's pretty much what I got too. Listen, Kingzog, as far as I see it you have 3 choices: 1) Your allies really *are* in a bad place, at a stalemate, against NPO. And you're refusing to help them -- punishing your friends in a petty attempt to turn them against CSN. 2) You lied, your allies are not in a bad place (Which, by the way, consensus from the DH members I discussed that with was that your statements are untrue and that they are doing just fine), and you were making it up in an attempt to make CSN look bad. 3) In a period of a few days, DH somehow made a major breakthrough in the war and is now easily defeating NPO. Which is it? Please stop dancing, man up, and answer the question. You can keep making these statements, but you've kind of got to prove them to get anybody to believe you. Where have my opinions shifted? Are you referring to the public condemnation of CSN's handling of the peace process with DT? I'd advise you to go talk to Goose, Gibs or Liz. All have heard my complaints for weeks now and suggestions for improvements in the handling of terms. If "weeks of saying the same thing over and over" equals "opinions shift[ing] like the wind" to you... well.. I guess I'll have to agree that by your definition my opinions have been shifting quite a bit! You're the one who posted that load of crap about your allies needing your help pretty badly. You're the one who said Nordreich intended to provide that support. You're the one who named the obstacle standing in the way of that support as CSN. Now I'm asking you to justify your claims and explain why you are not acting if the need for your assistance is so urgent. From where I'm sitting, it looks as if you were either inventing the need for your assistance to make CSN look bad, or you are being petty and refusing assistance to your allies (who desperately need the assistance to end this war in a quick and efficient manner) to spite CSN. Which is it? Like I said before: Stop. Dancing. Answer the question. Why are you not supporting your allies if, as you claim, they need your help? Put away your ad hominem attacks and witty comebacks and answer the question. Or don't. Since we all know the answer already: DH didn't really need the help (you were lying about that), and you're not going to help them anyways (because you're petty and this is a way to try to pass blame off onto GOD through CSN.) Feel free to prove me wrong or explain your position. Otherwise, don't bother responding. Because it's pretty clear that you're dancing around the question here to avoid giving a straight answer. That makes you look bad, and people normally only do that if telling the truth will make them look worse.
  5. I'm fairly sure we've gotten our answer. You were full of it in your blog post and you've just showed that to the world.
  6. And i'd like to note that the ad hominems are not strengthening your argument. Grow up, Kingzog.
  7. I'm in VE, not CSN, and I have as much of a right to call you on your lies and BS as the next guy. Which is what I'm doing here. If your ally was honestly in so much trouble and you really wanted to help them, and now the only obstacle has been removed... Why aren't you helping them? Unless you were twisting the facts of the situation to make CSN look bad. But you'd never ever do that, would you?
  8. To help FAN. Who they care very much about and are obviously going to help out, rather than be petty and try to continue to "punish" their allies. Right? Uh, you do realize they have peace now, right? So they're literally not in an eternal war. Period. End of discussion. Not debatable.
  9. Standing offer's been on the table for months. It's a shame you won't take it.
  10. If they do, I'm happy. If they don't, they're liars.
  11. No, actually, when they originally said that they were fully aware of the circumstances since this was, like, one week ago. Do try to keep up.
  12. Well, no... They said they'd help out on NPO once peace was achieved for DT.
  13. I'm just wondering. Since apparently they were itching to pull that trigger and were ready and all but just needed the DT conflict to be ended. Then they had hours of notice that it was completed before update (but given DT's tendency to back out of agreements, I don't blame them for waiting for the OWF post.) How hard can it be to type up a DoW? Also, I'll never die. Ever. Deal with it.
×
×
  • Create New...