That's pretty much what I got too.
Listen, Kingzog, as far as I see it you have 3 choices:
1) Your allies really *are* in a bad place, at a stalemate, against NPO. And you're refusing to help them -- punishing your friends in a petty attempt to turn them against CSN.
2) You lied, your allies are not in a bad place (Which, by the way, consensus from the DH members I discussed that with was that your statements are untrue and that they are doing just fine), and you were making it up in an attempt to make CSN look bad.
3) In a period of a few days, DH somehow made a major breakthrough in the war and is now easily defeating NPO.
Which is it? Please stop dancing, man up, and answer the question.
You can keep making these statements, but you've kind of got to prove them to get anybody to believe you. Where have my opinions shifted? Are you referring to the public condemnation of CSN's handling of the peace process with DT? I'd advise you to go talk to Goose, Gibs or Liz. All have heard my complaints for weeks now and suggestions for improvements in the handling of terms. If "weeks of saying the same thing over and over" equals "opinions shift[ing] like the wind" to you... well.. I guess I'll have to agree that by your definition my opinions have been shifting quite a bit!
You're the one who posted that load of crap about your allies needing your help pretty badly. You're the one who said Nordreich intended to provide that support. You're the one who named the obstacle standing in the way of that support as CSN. Now I'm asking you to justify your claims and explain why you are not acting if the need for your assistance is so urgent. From where I'm sitting, it looks as if you were either inventing the need for your assistance to make CSN look bad, or you are being petty and refusing assistance to your allies (who desperately need the assistance to end this war in a quick and efficient manner) to spite CSN. Which is it?
Like I said before: Stop. Dancing. Answer the question. Why are you not supporting your allies if, as you claim, they need your help? Put away your ad hominem attacks and witty comebacks and answer the question. Or don't. Since we all know the answer already: DH didn't really need the help (you were lying about that), and you're not going to help them anyways (because you're petty and this is a way to try to pass blame off onto GOD through CSN.)
Feel free to prove me wrong or explain your position. Otherwise, don't bother responding. Because it's pretty clear that you're dancing around the question here to avoid giving a straight answer. That makes you look bad, and people normally only do that if telling the truth will make them look worse.