lebubu Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 Culminating with the extortion of [i]gargantuan[/i] reps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlkAK47_002 Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='SirWilliam' timestamp='1288366437' post='2496362'] Who knows, but dammit Pacifica had to come up somehow. [/quote] It was bound to happen eventually but I'm glad we got it out of the way Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='BlkAK47_002' timestamp='1288366892' post='2496369']It was bound to happen eventually but I'm glad we got it out of the way [/quote] A good days work I would say. Anyway, as I kind of mentioned earlier, could somebody answer for me a thing that is here puzzling me. Obviously you two are great friends. Treaty or not, its about the relationship. With that being said, why not just edit the original treaty? This seems a bit silly looking from the sidelines. Not a big issue of course, just a passing curiosity of mine,... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamerlane Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1288367151' post='2496374'] A good days work I would say. Anyway, as I kind of mentioned earlier, could somebody answer for me a thing that is here puzzling me. Obviously you two are great friends. Treaty or not, its about the relationship. With that being said, why not just edit the original treaty? This seems a bit silly looking from the sidelines. Not a big issue of course, just a passing curiosity of mine,... [/quote] The original treaty was dropped, this is a new dawn! :Edit: Actually, I really don't know why Edited October 29, 2010 by tamerlane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voytek Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1288367151' post='2496374']With that being said, why not just edit the original treaty? This seems a bit silly looking from the sidelines. Not a big issue of course, just a passing curiosity of mine,...[/quote] This way is far more exciting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormsend Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 tamerlane's presence in this thread reminds me I am supposed to be mad at him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stumpy Jung Il Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Roadie' timestamp='1288362472' post='2496321'] I'd rather everyone grow up a little and let the ancient history go as well, but let's face it, if ancient history was alright to complain about during Karma, ancient history is going to be - unfortunately - alright to complain about today. Please how about everyone leave the old stuff in the recycle bin for now. You can bring it out later in some other thread. One that I'm not reading hopefully. I'm tired of scrolling through the past in a thread about a new treaty. Old News MK BAPS And just for good measure GOONS [/quote] Its not even that its ancient history. Its ancient history that has been discussed all the way to conclusion so many times it makes my eyes bleed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandellav Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Branimir' timestamp='1288367151' post='2496374'] A good days work I would say. Anyway, as I kind of mentioned earlier, could somebody answer for me a thing that is here puzzling me. Obviously you two are great friends. Treaty or not, its about the relationship. With that being said, why not just edit the original treaty? This seems a bit silly looking from the sidelines. Not a big issue of course, just a passing curiosity of mine,... [/quote] The original treaty was edited and reworked to fit an MADP format earlier this year when =LOST= and MK renewed the treaty in celebration of our 3 year anniversary. The treaty you see here is simply an edit of the MADP that was signed to reflect a change toward optional aggression and a non-chaining clause. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buds The Man Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Stumpy Jung Il' timestamp='1288369200' post='2496391'] Its not even that its ancient history. Its ancient history that has been discussed all the way to conclusion so many times it makes my eyes bleed. [/quote] ENOUGH you shall cause my King no more eye bleeds it takes the cleaning staff for ever to remove the blood from his robes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandellav Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 Oh, and we forgot to include this: [img]http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/6717/78836064.png[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brutilius Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 I cant be bothered to read 12 pages of rubbish, but congrats to two great alliances. Lets hope this treaty lasts just as long as the last one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandellav Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='potato' timestamp='1288365054' post='2496342'] We're also actively plotting against LOST [i]right now[/i]. [/quote] CnG-Bots, roll out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Mandellav' timestamp='1288370595' post='2496409'] Oh, and we forgot to include this: [img]http://img291.imageshack.us/img291/6717/78836064.png[/img] [/quote] Thats pretty cool. Congrats and good luck to LOST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Frontier Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Mandellav' timestamp='1288370879' post='2496413'] CnG-Bots, roll out! [/quote] So, um... We're cancelling our treaty btw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandellav Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='New Frontier' timestamp='1288373099' post='2496442'] So, um... We're cancelling our treaty btw. [/quote] Hey, don't have to be hasty, now. You do have the option to defend . Also, Ewok-Hobbits: Geek Out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='BlkAK47_002' timestamp='1288366892' post='2496369'] It was bound to happen eventually but I'm glad we got it out of the way [/quote] Heh, I'm surprised it didn't happen sooner. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mirreille Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1288361758' post='2496310'] Google is This would be a good argument, except that the leader of MK just admitted to always having wanted to see BAPS burn. Always means in 2007 too, when they were MDP partners. [/quote] Google IS awesome, I agree. If that is actually the case, I'd have to say he is moving at TOP speed on that little project.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archon Posted October 29, 2010 Report Share Posted October 29, 2010 [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1288343790' post='2496200'] Well, that certainly explains why you refused to defend them when Valhalla attacked them. It also puts this statement in a somewhat different light. At least you're dropping the pretence that you've always been a good, loyal ally. [/quote] [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1288361758' post='2496310'] Google is This would be a good argument, except that the leader of MK just admitted to always having wanted to see BAPS burn. Always means in 2007 too, when they were MDP partners. [/quote] [quote name='Haflinger' timestamp='1288362079' post='2496313'] To my knowledge, Archon has never before publicly admitted plotting the destruction of an MDP partner. [/quote] More or less, buddy. More or less. I put a hedging phrase in front of it for a reason. That said, can someone in MK remind me to add Invicta to my list? Please? I mean, they fit a principle criterion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='TheNeverender' timestamp='1288396501' post='2496729'] That said, can someone in MK remind me to add Invicta to my list? Please? I mean, they fit a principle criterion. [/quote] They aren't called Invicta anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1288456585' post='2497322'] They aren't called Invicta anymore. [/quote] So? You know who he's talking about, right? Just because Invicta made a silly name swap doesn't change what Archon is saying. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='potato' timestamp='1288461055' post='2497372'] So? You know who he's talking about, right? Just because Invicta made a silly name swap doesn't change what Archon is saying. [/quote] If you are going to make a hit list try and get the name right. I think 2 wars ago someone attacked the wrong Legion. So yes, it makes a difference if you get the name wrong. We wouldnt like to see Lord Philip of New Polar Order getting attacked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tamerlane Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1288465691' post='2497417'] If you are going to make a hit list try and get the name right. I think 2 wars ago someone attacked the wrong Legion. So yes, it makes a difference if you get the name wrong. We wouldnt like to see Lord Philip of New Polar Order getting attacked. [/quote] TBQH, our hit list includes everyone so names are pretty irrelevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devilyn Caster Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 [quote name='Denial' timestamp='1288362378' post='2496318'] We're also actively plotting against LOST [i]right now[/i]. [/quote] That's okay, our plan has been in motion for months now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
potato Posted October 30, 2010 Report Share Posted October 30, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Alterego' timestamp='1288465691' post='2497417'] If you are going to make a hit list try and get the name right. I think 2 wars ago someone attacked the wrong Legion. So yes, it makes a difference if you get the name wrong. We wouldnt like to see Lord Philip of New Polar Order getting attacked. [/quote] You know who we refer to when we say Pacifica or Polaris, right? I don't mind spanking you every time you say something but, really, you don't have to play dumb all time, you know. Edited October 31, 2010 by potato Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Kommissar Posted October 31, 2010 Report Share Posted October 31, 2010 [b][color="#FF0000"]This discussion has nothing to do with the OP. I suggest you all change that.[/color][/b] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.