Jump to content

lebubu

Members
  • Posts

    1,660
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lebubu

  1. yeah we only target the most relevant alliances so there you go
  2. I dunno about you guys but this strategic victory is just what we needed.
  3. Your coalition has literally edited its Declaration of War in an attempt to mask a monumental mistake. You're not exactly in a position to talk about accountability here. Maybe it's time to keep your exaggerations at a more moderate level. This backwards logic regarding acknowledging enemy doctrines that you're trying to push goes both ways.
  4. Maybe you and your friends should tell us more about undoing declarations of war via edit buttons. e: hotlink issue
  5. I think so, too. Especially if you want your alliance to ever grow past 100k NS.
  6. I don't get the logic behind claiming that MK is whining in any way -- it actually makes it easier to get rid of this annoying infrastructure and rogue on many more alliances! Then again, logic isn't EQ's strong point.
  7. Doomhouse is trying to trick EQ into hitting children.
  8. CN101: Alliance leaders spend most of their time diplomatizing on IRC and/or forums and trying to make people join their cause or consolidate their power sphere. Methods range from cybersex to mentioning that you like the same baseball team so there's no real depth here either(once in a while, alliances join forces because of similar views on the game but that isn't really the norm). Disliking the same alliance is usually enough for a defensive treaty. When the cards are looking good, coalitions enter a wait phase of sorts where they essentially keep their fingers crossed and wait for the enemy to fuck up. This usually happens and conflicts that are normally handled via diplomacy result in a global war. I guess the last thing worth mentioning is that no one actually cares about the CB and that the real motivation behind every CN war is to either keep your enemy down or change the "World Order". All of this can be traced back to boredom so the guy above is pretty spot on.
  9. No, it can't, thankfully. We don't build infra heavy nations that melt like butter whenever they're declared on. I know right? An online table and you still can't get it right. makes u think
  10. I'm sure there are but preventing someone from going rogue is a ridiculous notion.
  11. The damage you're doing is of little consequence in the long run. You, on the other hand, have sacrificed any chance of ever having a competitive top tier again. Doesn't sound like something to hope for to me but to each his own.
  12. It's comical because your coalition can't even roll us properly but clowns like you are still trying to act tough for some reason.
  13. Um, false. It's like that one time when we rolled NPO for forcing our hand and not activating its treaties. In fact, I can't remember ever fighting an offensive war.
  14. You're way beyond the limits of logic with this one, sorry. You (well, AI) started this war and it has nothing to do with whose destruction we wanted at one point or another (and yes, a considerable number of MKers do want your side to be beaten into the ground). Try again.
  15. Just how braindead do you think the people here are?
  16. Could you expand on this? e: j/w because you don't seem to know what you're talking about.
  17. Good propaganda doesn't have to be explained but I guess it's better than nothing. e: being a zergling isn't terribly flattering though so uh
  18. You're about as detached from the realities of this world as he (or the GDA in general is) so no one is expecting you to get anything. e: this is my least favourite faction but have a nice one -- this time.
  19. That was the motto, the war was a preemptive strike as a result of NpO attempting to "protect the core" by keeping its big brother safe. Ugh, now I'm doing it.
×
×
  • Create New...