berbers Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I find specially funny the part in which Bones would need to lose 300,000 NS worth in property for anyone in Mi6 being able to hit him. Well your allies who already ghosted you have people that could hit him, but I guess that won't happen for whatever reason :/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) Well your allies who already ghosted you have people that could hit him, but I guess that won't happen for whatever reason :/ Why would we ask our allies to hit someone who hasn't attacked us? If you want to see our allies involved in war so bad, then go, do it yourself. Yeah - that's why I said good luck ;) And why would we want to attack Bones, to begin with? Edited October 8, 2014 by Krashnaia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I don't have any desire to see your allies come in as I don't have a horse in this race. But don't act like you have no ability to deal with him... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I don't have any desire to see your allies come in as I don't have a horse in this race. But don't act like you have no ability to deal with him... I fail to see any problem we have to deal with Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I don't have any desire to see your allies come in as I don't have a horse in this race. But don't act like you have no ability to deal with him... It's a terrible shame that Kaskus lacks the ability to boot people off their AA they don't endorse being there. Terrible. Because that would actually be how to "deal" with it. But hey, if you are saying that Mi6's allies should be policing the Kaskus AA to remove ghosts, then by all means we'd like to have that in writing--preferably in some sort of agreement that also puts someone in charge as a viceroy with full authority to manage the alliance, because clearly they need leadership in these troubled times. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 It's a terrible shame that Kaskus lacks the ability to boot people off their AA they don't endorse being there. Terrible. Because that would actually be how to "deal" with it. But hey, if you are saying that Mi6's allies should be policing the Kaskus AA to remove ghosts, then by all means we'd like to have that in writing--preferably in some sort of agreement that also puts someone in charge as a viceroy with full authority to manage the alliance, because clearly they need leadership in these troubled times. What he is saying is that Mi6's leader set the standard with his grandiose statement that they, indeed, WOULD police the Kaskus AA. Some people took that opportunity to reinforce to Mi6,. how woefully incapable they are of backing up their own bravado. Everyone else gets much amusement out of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenMorningstar Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 And why would we want to attack Bones, to begin with? This right here.... Given the choice of fighting with bones and not fighting with bones... Unless I was Cuba I would choose not fighting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Bad Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 It's a terrible shame that Kaskus lacks the ability to boot people off their AA they don't endorse being there. Terrible. Because that would actually be how to "deal" with it. But hey, if you are saying that Mi6's allies should be policing the Kaskus AA to remove ghosts, then by all means we'd like to have that in writing--preferably in some sort of agreement that also puts someone in charge as a viceroy with full authority to manage the alliance, because clearly they need leadership in these troubled times. As I follow it MI6 made some grand claim that they would be dealing with any Kaskus ghosts, DBDC decided to send some nations to ghost MI6 look stupid for making such a claim. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) As I follow it MI6 made some grand claim that they would be dealing with any Kaskus ghosts, DBDC decided to send some nations to ghost MI6 look stupid for making such a claim. MI6 made the statement that anyone ghosting Kaskus would have to reach it's own peace agreement. And that's exactly what happened here. If you have any problem with it, maybe you should talk with DBDC about it. If Bones decides to sell down 300,000 NS and attack us, we will deal with him. But for some reason I don't see that happening. Edited October 8, 2014 by Krashnaia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I guess the lesson is not to make threats you can't back up, since I find it unlikely MI6 will wait for the day they have a nation in Bones' range and then attack. On another subject, why is this still going on? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 What he is saying is that Mi6's leader set the standard with his grandiose statement that they, indeed, WOULD police the Kaskus AA. Some people took that opportunity to reinforce to Mi6,. how woefully incapable they are of backing up their own bravado. Everyone else gets much amusement out of this. As I follow it MI6 made some grand claim that they would be dealing with any Kaskus ghosts, DBDC decided to send some nations to ghost MI6 look stupid for making such a claim. With much, much respect to my allies at Mi6, in a world where alliance jumping for purposes of warfare has become FAR too common, and a world where nations have NS values so high it defies common sense that they should even exist, let alone be able to attack people with less than 3 times their NS, making any sweeping claims about dealing with other people's roster issues is a bit silly. That said, I fully understand Mi6's frustration at the number of NEW-affiliated nations popping up on the Kaskus AA early on, and I think that Mi6 later adapted to the situation as best they could. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenMorningstar Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) MI6 made the statement that anyone ghosting Kaskus would have to reach it's own peace agreement. And that's exactly what happened here. I think this part is getting lost. A separate peace does not mean a harsher peace. People here always assume the worst "HA HA MI6 isn't making DBDC pay 10 billion in reps, what a bunch of liars!" Even though nothing was ever stated about what kind of peace would be reached with ghosts, just that it would be separate from kaskus. Edited October 8, 2014 by KenMorningstar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted October 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I think this part is getting lost. A separate peace does not mean a harsher peace. People here always assume the worst "HA HA MI6 isn't making DBDC pay 10 billion in reps, what a bunch of liars!" Even though nothing was ever stated about what kind of peace would be reached with ghosts, just that it would be separate from kaskus. The part getting lost is where MI6 said they will take 6 full aid slots outgoing from every ghost in exchange for peace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) The part getting lost is where MI6 said they will take 6 full aid slots outgoing from every ghost in exchange for peace. I understand that you are upset because DBDC won't be coming to win your war for you. But, you know, you should talk about it with them in private. Edited October 8, 2014 by Krashnaia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redarmy Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I understand that you are upset because DBDC won't be coming to win your war for you. But, you know, you should talk about it with them in private. That makes the game boring then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted October 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) I understand that you are upset because DBDC won't be coming to win your war for you. But, you know, you should talk about it with them in private. :rolleyes: Don't even know where to start... There is so much wrong with that.. here's an attempt: don't need them/didn't ask them to come/no one in range for them to hit/I'm sure they'd come back if I asked/Bones is here still anyways/we have plenty of allies, sans DBDC, who could come wreck you if that needs to happen/etc. Keep grasping at straws. Y'all should make that M16s motto. Edited October 8, 2014 by Unknown Smurf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 I understand that you are upset because DBDC won't be coming to win your war for you. But, you know, you should talk about it with them in private. That's probably because Doombird Doomcave isn't required in this war as MI6 have nobody in range they could really fight against. Thus, it's less a case of being upset but more a case of you clutching at straws to try and bring them into a fight they gain nothing from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dre4mwe4ver Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 The part that's being blatantly ignored in an attempt, which I'm not sure is more desperate or intellectually insulting, to save face is that Mi6 was "completely disinterested in ever giving" this separate peace that has allegedly been so eagerly and hastily achieved. Y'all seem awfully interested. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malinok Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 Yawn! Summary: Kaskus can't handle what they tried to bite off. They'd rather burn than seek peace. If they could fight like their supporters wail, they would be kicking ass inspite of the odds Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerschbs Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 The part that's being blatantly ignored in an attempt, which I'm not sure is more desperate or intellectually insulting, to save face is that Mi6 was "completely disinterested in ever giving" this separate peace that has allegedly been so eagerly and hastily achieved. Y'all seem awfully interested. Intellectually insulting? Kinda like basing an entire argument on one statement that was made, after the context of said statement has changed? But of course, something like that could never happen to you, right Dream? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keysariyt Hanssen Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 On another subject, why is this still going on? You aren't the only one asking this question. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) :rolleyes: Don't even know where to start...Maybe you could start with a link to that statement by MI6 about we going to require 6 aid slots for every ghost? The part that's being blatantly ignored in an attempt, which I'm not sure is more desperate or intellectually insulting, to save face is that Mi6 was "completely disinterested in ever giving" this separate peace that has allegedly been so eagerly and hastily achieved. Y'all seem awfully interested.If you are so upset because those DBDC nations offered peace to us before firing the first nuke, talk about it with them in private. Will be more productive for you than nitpicking and discussing semantics here. Edited October 8, 2014 by Krashnaia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 (edited) . Edited October 8, 2014 by Krashnaia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TurnipCruncher Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 What page is this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted October 8, 2014 Report Share Posted October 8, 2014 49 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.