Tiagoroth Posted December 14, 2013 Author Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 STA peaced out because they had nobody left to defend. It's that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 STA peaced out because they had nobody left to defend. It's that simple. Precisely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrash Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Wasn't trying to twist anything, was merely asking a question about an alliance that I know you want to roll. :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Wasn't trying to twist anything, was merely asking a question about an alliance that I know you want to roll. :) No, you tried to create a "gotcha" and failed miserably. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoshuaR Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Personally I support your line of thinking, it'd make wars far messier than the clean cut sides coalition warfare brings, it'd be nice to have wars be a complete cluster$%&@. Personally I'd rather pre-empt obvious counters before allowing them into PM to declare on their own terms. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warrior Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Coming from a guy in an alliance who couldn't even break even on damage dealt vs taken.... I'm sorry that our entire alliance actually fights. I have a feeling your tone would be a bit different had we decided to burn our entire top tier like you did. Well done though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I have a feeling your tone would be a bit different had we decided to burn our entire top tier like you did. Well done though. Well, you keep discussing hypotheticals and we'll keep discussing what actually happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warrior Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Well, you keep discussing hypotheticals and we'll keep discussing what actually happened. Perhaps you'd like to revisit our own little personal skirmish then Tyga. Take a look and then get back to me on hypotheticals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I'm not sure why you'd expect me to come back with hypotheticals. I'm more than happy to stick with reality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Personally I'd rather pre-empt obvious counters before allowing them into PM to declare on their own terms. I support anything new, we control our world, lets make it more interesting that the rather predictable one we live in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
memoryproblems Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) I have a feeling your tone would be a bit different had we decided to burn our entire top tier like you did. Well done though. I imagine the tone of alot of people would be different if IRON honored treaties and defended allies the same way STA does, or you know, at all. Edited December 14, 2013 by memoryproblems Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ditchboy00 Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) I have a feeling your tone would be a bit different had we decided to burn our entire top tier like you did. Well done though. It was almost like IRON was afraid of DBDC? I did enjoy your MOD spying me not getting caught then messaging me implying it was DBDC waiting for us to get out of PM to raid us. Im sure you and I will be fighting again next war. Top 20 in destruction this time. Hopefully next time we break top 10. edit: lol at it turning into STA/Polar again. Edited December 14, 2013 by ditchboy00 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeroofTime55 Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Love both you guys, glad to see you get peace. I sorta wanted to fight some of my old friends in TPF, but eh. Been busy lately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I'd ask if you even read the post that you quoted as your response makes such little sense, I'll just attribute it to senility though. I have read the sum of your work within this thread, you are truly a mastermind. My post makes perfect sense, you are clueless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Props to TPF for defending NPO for as long as they could and getting peace when they needed. Also props to STA for defending TPF for as long as they did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 (edited) 80k to 43, pretty close to half. And you weren't even at war as long as we were. You were also able to send out 25 nukes while only taking 13. Surely your damage ratios are due to being the next Alexander or Napoleon in CN and not due to the vagaries of SDI's and not being a priority nuclear target. Bravo! I'm quaking in my boots at the thought of you being in my range should we ever be at war again. @Thrash, I think we would. We entered to defend TPF, no matter how joyous we would be to be fighting whomever we were at war with we'd be leaving when TPF had peace. Close to 80k was my war build up of aircraft and troops, my actual peace NS was 75k or so. I was at war for 20 days and my damage ratio's is due to your alliance getting a good beating. Edited December 14, 2013 by Commander shepard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Buscemi Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I support anything new, we control our world, lets make it more interesting that the rather predictable one we live in. These last two wars were not like past great wars in most ways. Now we have about 75%+ of all DoW's on the bigger side using chained oA's. Last war featured some of the longest chain'ed oAs ever and this war repeated that trend. I guess in that sense, this war has been similar to Dave and past wars with lots of pre-empts. Just this war alliances try to disguise their pre-empts with various "methods" like fake treaties and oA'ing in with an oDP or such long oA chains you might as well call it what it is, a pre-empt/bandwagon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 These last two wars were not like past great wars in most ways. Now we have about 75%+ of all DoW's on the bigger side using chained oA's. Last war featured some of the longest chain'ed oAs ever and this war repeated that trend. I guess in that sense, this war has been similar to Dave and past wars with lots of pre-empts. Just this war alliances try to disguise their pre-empts with various "methods" like fake treaties and oA'ing in with an oDP or such long oA chains you might as well call it what it is, a pre-empt/bandwagon. We might as well call this what it is too: whining Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 These last two wars were not like past great wars in most ways. Now we have about 75%+ of all DoW's on the bigger side using chained oA's. Last war featured some of the longest chain'ed oAs ever and this war repeated that trend. I guess in that sense, this war has been similar to Dave and past wars with lots of pre-empts. Just this war alliances try to disguise their pre-empts with various "methods" like fake treaties and oA'ing in with an oDP or such long oA chains you might as well call it what it is, a pre-empt/bandwagon. Here we go. This coalition is as bad as the old argument. Beating a dead horse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewie Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I wish we could just go back to the good old "I don't like you" fights. They were fun. Mano e mano Last alliance standing. Guess that's why people like planet Steve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auctor Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Not very many people like planet steve btw. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Link Gaetz Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 I wish we could just go back to the good old "I don't like you" fights. They were fun. Mano e mano Last alliance standing. Guess that's why people like planet Steve. To have mano e mano, you need mano and mano. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikolay Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 That was a great fight, TPF & STA. Kudos. When you gotta go, you gotta go though. Thanks for defending our side for as long as you did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenMorningstar Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 Mano A Mano. No e, no y either. E (and you mean Y) means and. Hand and hand, you want alliance to skip down the Lane together holding hands? A means to. Hand to hand, which is what you probably mean, since the version Americans quote means one on one, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warrior Posted December 14, 2013 Report Share Posted December 14, 2013 It was almost like IRON was afraid of DBDC? I did enjoy your MOD spying me not getting caught then messaging me implying it was DBDC waiting for us to get out of PM to raid us. Im sure you and I will be fighting again next war. Top 20 in destruction this time. Hopefully next time we break top 10. edit: lol at it turning into STA/Polar again. So 4th time's a charm? #3 was fun though. Lots of dead pixels in that one. Good fight old friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.