chefjoe Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 I find this whole turn of conversation quite hilarious.....all I know is that if I wanted revenge for something I deemed so heinous that it makes me froth at the mouth 3yrs later, I can assure you id have taken care of bsns quite awhile ago and served it up quite cold. Though thats just me, maybe others play a much longer game in their hunt for satisfaction. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 (edited) I just infiltrated NSO propaganda department and was able to gather their new idea to finally make them able to roll Polaris: Edited July 17, 2013 by D34th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garion Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 (edited) I just infiltrated NSO propaganda department and was able to gather their new idea to finally make them able to roll Polaris:Priceless. Where has the lazyness gone, Death? :P Edited July 17, 2013 by Garion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 Priceless. Where has the lazyness gone, Death? :P Not very far I fear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascended Dio Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 "I don't like your virtual alliance that has no meaning so much that I'll hold a grudge." "Oh yeah? Well I don't like your virtual alliance that has no meaning either." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 (edited) Well what's stopping you? We aren't hard to find. Would a map help? This. If that whole sphere (however it's supposed to be defined) is supposed to be so ready to roll Polar, why not just start the fight already? They've probably got the tech advantage and so many alliances seem to swear on religious icons that their top tiers have endless warchests. "They" want the fight. "We", for the most part, would like the fight as well. ...why the hell aren't we having the fight? Edited July 17, 2013 by Avakael Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unpronounced Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 Congrats, XX on your new member. And Cable, I would just like to say, you have handled the entire situation with great aplomb. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panic King Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 I just infiltrated NSO propaganda department and was able to gather their new idea to finally make them able to roll Polaris: I miss you ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panic King Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 I find this whole turn of conversation quite hilarious.....all I know is that if I wanted revenge for something I deemed so heinous that it makes me froth at the mouth 3yrs later, I can assure you id have taken care of bsns quite awhile ago and served it up quite cold. Though thats just me, maybe others play a much longer game in their hunt for satisfaction. :P Am I dreaming? I actually like this post . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Caparo Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 in before good alliances dont need blocs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youwish959 Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 I find this whole turn of conversation quite hilarious.....all I know is that if I wanted revenge for something I deemed so heinous that it makes me froth at the mouth 3yrs later, I can assure you id have taken care of bsns quite awhile ago and served it up quite cold. Though thats just me, maybe others play a much longer game in their hunt for satisfaction. :P It doesn't make us froth at mouth so much. It's just more of "We're gonna get ours when it is convenient". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 (edited) so why wasn't it convenient during Dave War and Grudge War? hell you could have even jumped in against them during EQ edit- my god...even PB-NpO ffs. if this enormous grudge so so much that you've carried it practically my whole existence on this world, then there should be no excuses why you could not have carried it out. post-Legion war was Grudge. so many alliances on that side you could have a $5 war chest on the winning side and still wreck nations. You guys sat out during Dave War, so did Polar. You yourselves could have easily attacked them and brought them in or convinced someone else to do that and you attack right after. EQ? you sat out of claiming the Kaskus war kept you too occupied. then you turned around and DoS for NPO before they were attacked...and still didn't join the global war. and even then, you STILL could have attacked Polar Edited July 17, 2013 by Lurunin Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascended Dio Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 "Cyber Nations is important in real life, right?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 so why wasn't it convenient during Dave War and Grudge War? hell you could have even jumped in against them during EQ edit- my god...even PB-NpO ffs. if this enormous grudge so so much that you've carried it practically my whole existence on this world, then there should be no excuses why you could not have carried it out. post-Legion war was Grudge. so many alliances on that side you could have a $5 war chest on the winning side and still wreck nations. You guys sat out during Dave War, so did Polar. You yourselves could have easily attacked them and brought them in or convinced someone else to do that and you attack right after. EQ? you sat out of claiming the Kaskus war kept you too occupied. then you turned around and DoS for NPO before they were attacked...and still didn't join the global war. and even then, you STILL could have attacked Polar"this makes sense in not screwing your allies over by joining the opposing coalition, right?" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Williambonney Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 "Cyber Nations is important in real life, right?" Sadly for some people it is all that matters. :psyduck: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadRash Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 I just infiltrated NSO propaganda department and was able to gather their new idea to finally make them able to roll Polaris: Good to see you back in here :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 "this makes sense in not screwing your allies over by joining the opposing coalition, right?" That argument might be able to be made for EQ and even then that's hard to swallow due to those allies alrdy screwing over the coalition (remember, one person's allies are more important than the coalition as a whole, especially when they do everything in their power to support allies in another coalition rather than those you are fighting alongside) Again, what about Dave war, Grudge war? I'll give benefit of the doubt for PB-NpO due to bloc obligations at the time. But that's it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 (edited) That argument might be able to be made for EQ and even then that's hard to swallow due to those allies alrdy screwing over the coalition (remember, one person's allies are more important than the coalition as a whole, especially when they do everything in their power to support allies in another coalition rather than those you are fighting alongside)Again, what about Dave war, Grudge war? I'll give benefit of the doubt for PB-NpO due to bloc obligations at the time. But that's itlmao @ NPO screwing over the coalition. They actively tried to get people from bringing in NG. That isn't screwing over a coalition. It's smart. The fact that you don't understand that isn't too astounding, I guess, given your track record.Grudge (or Dave, can't remember) was directly after NSO just lost a war to Legion (due to shitty allied work) and both of those wars were pretty fucking messy. Not to mention NpO wasn't in Dave war so NSO would have had to go toe-to-toe with them, which isn't very fucking wise. Yet again, you seem to not realize that an alliance needs to look after its needs, allies, and safety as well as its goals. Edited July 17, 2013 by Neo Uruk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 :lol1: I just infiltrated NSO propaganda department and was able to gather their new idea to finally make them able to roll Polaris:Thank you for giving me a good laugh today, well done Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USMC123 Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 Jesus this thread lol. In fairness to NSO, their grudge may be several years old, but NpO hasn't been relevant in as many years so I don't really see the issue here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mompson Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 3 AA's* I won't speak for NG and VE, but we're not stuck in a rut, we just don't buy into Polar's absolution at the hands of others (this 'Grudge War' you whine about not going your way while telling us to shed our diapers) while you continue to blame us for the incident that created all the troubles between our two alliances. It's been hashed a million times, but you believe what you want to. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 It's been hashed a million times, but you believe what you want to.And here we have a BiPolar denier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mompson Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 And here we have a BiPolar denier. And here you have someone who can't comprehend what I was referring to despite the fact that I even bolded it for him. Let me make it easier for you. Polar has taken responsibility for BiPolar. That is a fact. Rayvon's claim that we still blame NSO for what happened is absolutely false. If he wants to think we still blame NSO behind closed doors, it's his choice. But the world is moving on, and clearly Rayvon is not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Williambonney Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 It's been hashed a million times, but you believe what you want to. A million times? That's all? Rookie. :smug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted July 17, 2013 Report Share Posted July 17, 2013 And here you have someone who can't comprehend what I was referring to despite the fact that I even bolded it for him. Let me make it easier for you. Polar has taken responsibility for BiPolar. That is a fact. Rayvon's claim that we still blame NSO for what happened is absolutely false. If he wants to think we still blame NSO behind closed doors, it's his choice. But the world is moving on, and clearly Rayvon is not.Polar members and gov continue to find no fault in most of their actions, which would be putting at least some blame on the aggrieved parties for making Polar's actions reasonable or correct to them. I'm not saying this is true for NSO with respect to BiPolar, but it is believable that NpO would give a half-assed or backhanded apology given the track record. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.