Bob Ilyani Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 [quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1309428717' post='2744935'] You know I'm seeing these threads becoming CN's version of The Deadliest Warrior. Maybe we could try pitting past blocs/coalitions against other past blocs/coalitions that they never actually faced, or even against modern blocs. [/quote] This sounds like an awesome idea. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1309416077' post='2744890'] Indeed, they're won with Photoshop. Ask D34th. [/quote] True, that's why I lost 5 of the 7 wars that I took part Edited June 30, 2011 by D34th Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz Lightyear Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1309456166' post='2745159'] True, that's why I lost 5 of the 7 wars that I took part [/quote]what 2 wars did you win? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 [quote name='Buzz Lightyear' timestamp='1309463361' post='2745264'] what 2 wars did you win? [/quote] Continuum-NoV War. I was counting also TOP-CnG war but now I took a look at TOP surrender and saw that was a white peace, so: [b]Losses: [/b] GW2 GW3 Continuum-GPA War noCB war noCB war 2 [b]White Peace:[/b] Bi-Polar/Top-CnG war [b]Win:[/b] TPF-NoV war I have an amazing record of wars. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buzz Lightyear Posted June 30, 2011 Report Share Posted June 30, 2011 TPF-NoV war? that was during the time when i was too noob to pay attention to politics. I didnt even know NpO was part of that war. Bi-Polar, hell, that was all kinds of $%&@ed up. lol. i still dont know what happened in that war Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Buzz Lightyear' timestamp='1309471299' post='2745341'] TPF-NoV war? that was during the time when i was too noob to pay attention to politics. I didnt even know NpO was part of that war. Bi-Polar, hell, that was all kinds of $%&@ed up. lol. i still dont know what happened in that war [/quote] A 400 page book per night is light reading in comparison to all the crap my eyes had to endure that war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pd73bassman Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Hyperion321' timestamp='1309479826' post='2745438'] A 400 page book per night is light reading in comparison to all the crap my eyes had to endure that war. [/quote] Crap is one way to word it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 Tired of seeing the viking-SF war anticipation. One of you just please spy on the other already so we can start the 4th of July Fireworks show Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardus Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Rotavele' timestamp='1309516706' post='2745851'] Tired of seeing the viking-SF war anticipation. One of you just please spy on the other already so we can start the 4th of July Fireworks show [/quote] If they did I'd side with NPO and rein in the dark ages again just to spite them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyperion321 Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1309532838' post='2745964'] If they did I'd side with NPO and rein in the dark ages again just to spite them. [/quote] So [i]that's[/i] what that ODP is for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted July 1, 2011 Report Share Posted July 1, 2011 [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1309532838' post='2745964'] If they did I'd side with NPO and rein in the dark ages again just to spite them. [/quote] Well maybe it should happen, MK and NPO would agree on something together for once Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deathcat Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 [quote name='Kryievla' timestamp='1309143286' post='2742400'] Mjolnir. SF may have more people, but we have about the same nukes, better top end, & are skilled. [/quote] Agreed... And they have Kry... Nuff said Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 Being able to type Mjölnir doesn't make it any more pronounceable. Superfriends wins via phonetics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) [quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1309428717' post='2744935'] You know I'm seeing these threads becoming CN's version of The Deadliest Warrior. Maybe we could try pitting past blocs/coalitions against other past blocs/coalitions that they never actually faced, or even against modern blocs. [/quote] As awesome as that would be, it would never work. CN has grown, and the NS rule shave changed to hide that growth. We're much larger and stronger than we were back in the old days of the numbered great wars. The only thing that would be an advantage to them would be the number of nations. Would be like pitting a modern Armoured Division against the Zulus. Edited July 4, 2011 by Lord Levistus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Cyan Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1309743823' post='2748003'] The only thing that would be an advantage to them would be the number of nations. Would be like pitting a modern Armoured Division against the Zulus. [/quote] I would hope that you are correct and that it really is not that of National Socialist Germany vs The Soviet Union instead, (which is what it MIGHT be!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wishywashy Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) I quit CN shortly after the only war I ever won. Edited July 4, 2011 by Wishywashy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxfire99 Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1309743823' post='2748003'] As awesome as that would be, it would never work. CN has grown, and the NS rule shave changed to hide that growth. We're much larger and stronger than we were back in the old days of the numbered great wars. The only thing that would be an advantage to them would be the number of nations. Would be like pitting a modern Armoured Division against the Zulus. [/quote] Clearly you have never seen Deadliest Warrior. It is way more entertainment than science. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 Ardus you weren't supposed to reveal that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) [quote name='foxfire99' timestamp='1309771684' post='2748276'] Clearly you have never seen Deadliest Warrior. It is way more entertainment than science. [/quote] lol, i actually tried watching it once. Their "experts" sound like internet fan boys, it irritated me. Edited July 4, 2011 by Lord Levistus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 [quote name='Lord Levistus' timestamp='1309783065' post='2748314'] lol, i actually tried watching it once. Their "experts" sound like internet fan boys, it irritated me. [/quote] If they match is clearly lopsided, that tends to happen. They aren't just being paid as experts, they are being paid to defend their character. If that can't be reasonably argued, they are going to sound stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chalaskan Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 (edited) What really intrigues me is who would be on who's side if this did blow up. I am certain bloc vs. bloc that it would be a bloody battle with MJ winning in the end. But then you have so many variables as to who would join in on which side. Fark would most likely go in with SF, would WTF join in if PB joined MJ's side? Would PB and C&G take opposite sides? Would several splits happen? So many questions that would make this a hell of a war, or another curbstomp. Edited July 4, 2011 by Chalaskan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImperialCubanacan Posted July 4, 2011 Report Share Posted July 4, 2011 Purely speculation (nothing hidden here), I see it happening like this: Aside from the poll's initial parameters - [b][color="#006400"]Mjölnir[/color][/b] Ragnarok Nordreich Valhalla Dark Templar Asgaard [b][color="#006400"]+ Friends[/color][/b] League of Small Superpowers + Imperial Assault Alliance (by extension of assisting their close ally) Symphony Nueva Vida + AZTEC bloc (see Colossus) + Duckroll Project, possibly minus Independent Republic of Orange Nations (IRON) (see explanation) Mushroom Kingdom + The Order of Paradox (by extension of assisting their close ally) Colossus + AZTEC bloc, through Nueva Vida and Colossus; multiple links would bring the bloc in [i]and it goes on.......[/i] My theory is GOONS would sit the war out; so as to not attack their ally in Mushroom Kingdom or their ally. Independent Republic of Orange Nations (IRON) may enter in such a scenario by extension of their ally Mushroom Kingdom. If I had more patience to comb through the treaty web for [b]both[/b] sides, I could link every possible combatant to at least one bloc and five allies who would be linked to at least one bloc and another five allies -- [b]see where I am going with this?[/b] Any war involving these two blocs would incite a global war. It would literally have to be resolved before the update after the initial declarations. The treaty web is just too enormous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted July 5, 2011 Report Share Posted July 5, 2011 GOONS sit a war out? You're outta your mind! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vol Navy Posted July 5, 2011 Report Share Posted July 5, 2011 (edited) [quote name='ImperialCubanacan' timestamp='1309803922' post='2748427'] Purely speculation (nothing hidden here), I see it happening like this: Aside from the poll's initial parameters - [b][color="#006400"]Mjölnir[/color][/b] Ragnarok Nordreich Valhalla Dark Templar Asgaard [b][color="#006400"]+ Friends[/color][/b] League of Small Superpowers + Imperial Assault Alliance (by extension of assisting their close ally) Symphony Nueva Vida + AZTEC bloc (see Colossus) + Duckroll Project, possibly minus Independent Republic of Orange Nations (IRON) (see explanation) Mushroom Kingdom + The Order of Paradox (by extension of assisting their close ally) Colossus + AZTEC bloc, through Nueva Vida and Colossus; multiple links would bring the bloc in [i]and it goes on.......[/i] My theory is GOONS would sit the war out; so as to not attack their ally in Mushroom Kingdom or their ally. Independent Republic of Orange Nations (IRON) may enter in such a scenario by extension of their ally Mushroom Kingdom. If I had more patience to comb through the treaty web for [b]both[/b] sides, I could link every possible combatant to at least one bloc and five allies who would be linked to at least one bloc and another five allies -- [b]see where I am going with this?[/b] Any war involving these two blocs would incite a global war. It would literally have to be resolved before the update after the initial declarations. The treaty web is just too enormous. [/quote] I would think it would fall mostly based on the CB. But most likely SF would pull in XX through R&R and FARK. They would also pull in VE through the VE/GOD MADP. Which would likely pull in all of PB. Now you got to think...would MK go against their DH compatriots to side with NoR via their ODP? I can't imagine that happening. I also didn't realize IRON was allied to MK. So unless it was just a completely stupid, gift wrapped CB from SF or a member on a Mj member, I can't see it ending as anything less than SF/PB/DH/XX crushing Mj and DR if DR didn't sit it out like they did last war. Edited July 5, 2011 by Vol Navy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ImperialCubanacan Posted July 5, 2011 Report Share Posted July 5, 2011 Well, actually, IRON isn't. That was an error on my part, I was looking over the blocs and treaty web and somehow bunched them in with MK. It was meant as a separate discussion. The possibilities are certainly endless. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.