Ragashingo Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Can't you see? We're all victims! All of us! The humanity! Speak for yourself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kylliah Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Shane, it's impolite to tell someone the source of your information without first asking that source if you can reveal their name. That's common courtesy. Not sure if Moo follows that rule, but I know plenty of people do. Well, if his anger and frustration at others not following that rule is any indication, I'd say he does. At least from what I've seen in the past. The point remains on this, why was the information passed around in the first place? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agnews Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 (edited) Ok so Moo claims MHawk told him and Ironchef told MHawk...then why not answer me when I asked LAST NIGHT: THIS AFTERNOON: what exactly does this prove aside from GGA incompetence edit what is this, i dont even Edited May 26, 2009 by agnews Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Ok so Moo claims MHawk told him and Ironchef told MHawk...then why not answer me when I asked LAST NIGHT: THIS AFTERNOON: Those actually seem to support what Moo and mhawk have been saying, so I'm not sure where you're trying to go with this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
agnews Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Those actually seem to support what Moo and mhawk have been saying, so I'm not sure where you're trying to go with this. thats what i am thinking Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Last Imperial Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 what exactly does this prove aside from GGA incompetenceso you canceled on NPO because he diddent mention at the time that it was Mhawk.......... ya they did and I think they had good reason, if NPO went to them with info they didnt check, and endangered there members they have the right to cancel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lincongrad Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 what exactly does this prove aside from GGA incompetenceso you canceled on NPO because he diddent mention at the time that it was Mhawk.......... Could be incompetence. Could be they were looking for an excuse. I dunno. A lot of alliances seem eager to get away from NPO recently, for some reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
astronaut jones Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 (edited) GGA's image is tarnished beyond belief. Your image is like your brand, if it gets tarnished, then what's there left for you to do, when it's been tarnished this much? You gotta think about that.. all anyone has here on PB is their image. Edited May 27, 2009 by astronaut jones Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin McDonald Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 thats what i am thinking Me too... damn mob mentality. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 I just cannot seem to follow the chain of events. GGA tells mhawk that Athens is going to pull terms. mhawk tells Moo that Athens is going to pull terms, without citing the source (which is the only thing that makes sense). Moo tells GGA that Athens is going to pull terms, thereby informing them of something they already knew (or did they...?). GGA contacts Athens asking them if they are going to pull terms, citing Moo's tip that Athens is going to pull terms that actually came from GGA. Athens and GGA post a joint response. Am I the only one utterly, utterly, confused? My head asplode. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 (edited) He is. And he's dragging me into it somehow It's an Evil Overlord trick of some sort. There must be a manual in the desk. And I bet it's a blast at the bar. Edited May 26, 2009 by Roadie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Shane, it's impolite to tell someone the source of your information without first asking that source if you can reveal their name. That's common courtesy. Not sure if Moo follows that rule, but I know plenty of people do. Moo follows that rule. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Just as a point of clarification, was the post earlier about TPFs cancellation on GGA AFTER the 72 hour notice, or are we in that 72 hour time frame? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 I just cannot seem to follow the chain of events.GGA tells mhawk that Athens is going to pull terms. mhawk tells Moo that Athens is going to pull terms, without citing the source (which is the only thing that makes sense). Moo tells GGA that Athens is going to pull terms, thereby informing them of something they already knew (or did they...?). GGA contacts Athens asking them if they are going to pull terms, citing Moo's tip that Athens is going to pull terms that actually came from GGA. Athens and GGA post a joint response. Am I the only one utterly, utterly, confused? My head asplode. From what I'm gathering, the 'GGA' person that told mhawk, wasn't actually in GGA at the time. All their changes at the top are difficult to keep track of though, so I could be wrong about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lincongrad Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Moo follows that rule. Well there we go then. This looks more and more like a tremendous overreaction by all parties. I hope Athens plans on asking some tough questions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 From what I'm gathering, the 'GGA' person that told mhawk, wasn't actually in GGA at the time. All their changes at the top are difficult to keep track of though, so I could be wrong about that. I am still lost. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 This is horribly confusing. I almost want Athens to just roll GGA and be like "Got ya!", just because it would make things so much simpler. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 (edited) I am simply assaulting your willingness to further specious claims without caring to think about them. If you take offense to your absurd statements being questioned correctly, then reconsider them. I wouldn't call the wholesale (and incorrect) fabrication of my position and going off on a insult-fueled rant against it 'questioning my statements correctly'. I would call that Chron making a fool of himself. And I certainly didn't take offense at your making a fool of yourself. You might have noticed I laughed in your face. As you obviously have nothing to go on, I implore you, because I'm enjoying this so much, to once again twist my words so that I may continue this amusing exchange. edit: morphological error. Edited May 26, 2009 by Sal Paradise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 In the end I think Athens might deserve reps for this headache. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Last Imperial Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 Well there we go then. This looks more and more like a tremendous overreaction by all parties. I hope Athens plans on asking some tough questions. I agree with you 100% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haflinger Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 From what I'm gathering, the 'GGA' person that told mhawk, wasn't actually in GGA at the time. All their changes at the top are difficult to keep track of though, so I could be wrong about that. Ironchef's ingame AA is still the Grand Global Alliance. Although I'm with Roadie on this on too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
im317 Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 In the end I think Athens might deserve reps for this headache. i think everyone who read this does. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintenderek Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 From what I'm gathering, the 'GGA' person that told mhawk, wasn't actually in GGA at the time. All their changes at the top are difficult to keep track of though, so I could be wrong about that. This is what I was trying to get at earlier. I think it's very possible that Ironchef was not in GGA at the time of these incidents, although she is currently wearing the AA of the Grand Global Alliance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inquisitor Tolkien Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 But Haf, ironchef was in the convo with Moo. You just made everything infinitely more confusing. THIS MAKES NO SENSE. DOES NOT COMPUTE. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sileath Posted May 26, 2009 Report Share Posted May 26, 2009 I am still lost. Basically Moo took bad intelligence and acted in bad faith, embarrassing his ally and soiling the reputation of NPO. So in case you were wondering if Moo has learned any lessons since the attack on Ordo Verde, the answer is no. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.