Jump to content

Ragashingo

Members
  • Content Count

    1,869
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Ragashingo

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Gilren
  • Resource 1
    Furs
  • Resource 2
    Uranium
  1. I'm impressed that the banner images from these old topics are still online.
  2. You're nothing compared to me. At least not in the honesty department. You are a bit more active in hunting down a story though...
  3. Tyga is right of course. What happened in the planning of the abandoned goons roll was a disgrace to most* involved. Not only that but by failing to come up with a "valid" CB you just made it harder for yourselves to piece together the necessary coalition the next time you want to try and go to war. You'll suggest a war, maybe a perfectly valid well reasoned one, but those you suggest it to will always remember the time that you couldn't come up with one good reason to attack goons. *I thought our people came off pretty darn well and mainly provided a reality check for everyone else.
  4. A couple of things: 1. A lot of you people (those in the logs) have been around here for a long time. So how come the CB's that were getting tossed around were so astoundingly bad? Fake trap alliances? Really? pezstar was right, (I'm paraphrasing here...) your plans would have been more credible and likely to succeed if you had all just DoWed GOONs with the reason: "We hate goons!" 2. Could whoever keeps leaking these logs please stop it! I despise poor war planning and tech raiding and curbstomping but I really really look down on people who can't keep a secret. And this isn't a pro goon
  5. Pezstar and Bob Janova have nothing on me...
  6. [quote name='Dilber' date='06 February 2010 - 10:35 AM' timestamp='1265474113' post='2164635'] Man, I gotta give you credit for this one Grub. I think you've actually made the New Pacific Order the less hated Order. Lets assume there are 4 Orders(though TOP doesn't usually consider itself one, and I'm not including other alliances that have order in their new, e.g. Big top) I used to say the hatred was 1. NPO 2. NSO 3. TOP 4. NpO Now, It's a crapshoot. [/quote] Thats only because you guys... wait your old alliance ... hasn't done anything for months now
  7. [quote name='trance addict' date='03 February 2010 - 11:50 AM' timestamp='1265219445' post='2156791'] Is there not a cancellation clause? I mean if you do feel slighted then that might be the enough is enough, to reconsider the treaties held with those alliances. Please don't take the above statement as my view of what you should or shouldn't do. I am not in your alliance, nor do I have all the facts. My comment is merely an alternate view based on your statement. Unless you have a non-cancellation clause ie. MHA-Gre, then you should have a provision for jumping ship (such an ugly conotatio
  8. [quote name='Alterego' date='03 February 2010 - 12:25 AM' timestamp='1265178353' post='2155762'] Congratulations STA. You weighed up everything and went with the massively superior side (56m V 118m) in this war to fight against the people who had your back only a a week or so ago for the side you were fighting against. This will never be forgotten and regularly brought up in the future. I cant see it as anything other that picking the larger side, which is sad because I never expected an alliance like STA to do something like that. [/quote] You're three pages too late. Sargun will (should?
  9. [quote name='Sargun' date='02 February 2010 - 11:51 PM' timestamp='1265176281' post='2155481'] Three mil says the complete opposite of this post is done by page 3. [/quote] Welp, you lose. [url=http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=343076]My nation link[/url]
  10. [quote name='Laserwolf' date='02 February 2010 - 11:54 PM' timestamp='1265176467' post='2155515'] I bring a message from Moniker of GATO [/quote] Now that we can agree on.
  11. [quote name='TwistedRebelDB47' date='02 February 2010 - 11:31 PM' timestamp='1265175076' post='2155126'] DOW [/quote] You're welcome. Just don't forget that Polar's war was about morals, not just about attacking whoever you want.
  12. I'd say we had more than two camps, but close enough. The various camps do tend to compress back down to two when a big war occurs. I'm really not sure there is any real difference here between pre and post Karma War. In either case starting a minor conflict was / is dangerous. Whoa there! I didn't say anything about a lack of diplomacy and I'm not very sure that you aren't trying to twist my words here. I in fact do like diplomacy before a war. What I don't like is what alliances used to do before the Karma War. They'd pull another alliance's leaders into a back room then hound them wi
  13. [quote name='Schattenmann' date='31 January 2010 - 12:00 PM' timestamp='1264960827' post='2147877'] Maybe when everyone stops !@#$%*ing and moaning about the awful, uncomfortable, terrible, odious position--excuse me while I wipe a tear--they were dragged kicking and screaming into then I'll stop bringing it up. STA knew what they were getting into, Tyga's not a helmet-wearing retard, he picked one set of allies over another in a 100% discretionary war of imperialist aggression. So everyone please shut the hell up about the awkward positioning anywhere except your private halls when it mig
  14. Ever since the Karma war ended we've had dozen of people moan and complain how the world was too boring. Some said there were so many treaties that a major war couldn't happen. Others said that things wouldn't be interesting without the NPO knocking off alliances left and right. All this time I've been telling these people two things: 1. To open their eyes and recognize that the minor conflicts and wars are in themselves interesting. Since the Karma war we've had plenty of close calls, little wars, and front and back room dealings. There was plenty going on to keep on entertained. 2. To be
×
×
  • Create New...