im317

confirmed. thanks

is it even worth moving this month? April's location gives 96%. you probably entered the url incorrectly. the key par is &lat=-48.26031088767209&lon=-72.439453125&VALUE=C019B98F20 you need to replace the text starting with &lat all the way until the last number before the &VALUE with &lat=-50.99999999&lon=-78 it would look like this &lat=-50.99999999&lon=-78&VALUE=C019B98F20

confirmed 100%

it has been an amazing run Gopher, you have well earned retirement. as to anybody taking over in the future, i would advise against daily updates as its a crazy amount of work. if someone were to take over on a weekly or bi monthly basis that would probably be much easier to do, who knows it could even allow commentary(or guest commentary) to come back.

this sounds all well and good, but i reserve my judgment until l i see large scale deletions of the obvious tech multies and the subsequent tech removal.

did you ever apologize to Ghost? that might be a good place to start, maybe apologize to Entity too.

could we get aid % or something with tech. i want to see internal growth instead of recruitment. or maybe bring back the version where anyone who gains stays in, the one where no gain also was important.

damn it, passed in the 11th hour

killjoy123 im in peace mode right now so you have a chance to catch me

Gopher how many wars does the runner up have?

this will give RIA a chance to show off the fact that we somehow actually import a good deal of tech. before i got to the part about how it would be a tech contest i was going to suggest tech.

to bad you didn't consider this when you left VE for the last time and just kept shuffling old people into IA over and over. probably also part of the reason why it seems to turn over a lot now, since a lot of the people who were qualified to take over (a lot more then just me) moved on due to the lack of turnover to anyone but old people.

i would say that the only moral in CN is that anything allowed by game rules/mechanisms is moral. i find that people who want to eliminate something that game mechanics(and the ToS) allow to occur are only furthering to limit the available game play in what is already a very limited set of game mechanics.

minor note on the Bastion that did get signed(the MDP bloc)we(VE)were about to upgrade our ODP with RIA to a MDP. as i understand it alliance leadership decided to make this into a joke in addition to that MDP. as both VE and RIA had higher level treaties with RoK they were brought in to make it a bloc(needed a 3rd). that(the VE-RIA MDP) is also why Bastion was a MDP bloc and not a MDoAP bloc as many mistook it for.

voted 7-8 but put my vote for the first time that has a chance of winning.