Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 662
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I heard RIA left the defense of polar up to a random number generator. They rolled a dice to determine if they should even start the random number generator. The rolling of the dice was determined inexplicably by pulling a one-eyed jack out of a pinnacle deck. The dice roll came up a soft five which according to the Random Insanity Rules: Home Edition (R) means that the random number generator must be started by a one-armed howler monkey wearing a fedora.

Oh, the slings and arrows of outrageous spinelessness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322460610' post='2854474']
when you going to help your friends in STA Varianz?
[/quote]

No one has countered STA, good point there though.


Direct hit on treaty partner, a treaty that you signed to "call out" TOP over defending an alliance that hasnt been countered.


Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322460610' post='2854474']
when you going to help your friends in STA Varianz?
[/quote]
Rofl my friends in STA. Oh boy.

Edit: that is to say, we don't have friends in STA.

Edited by Varianz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mandellav' timestamp='1322460713' post='2854481']
I heard RIA left the defense of polar up to a random number generator. They rolled a dice to determine if they should even start the random number generator. The rolling of the dice was determined inexplicably by pulling a one-eyed jack out of a pinnacle deck. The dice roll came up a soft five which according to the Random Insanity Rules: Home Edition (R) means that the random number generator must be started by a one-armed howler monkey wearing a fedora.

Oh, the slings and arrows of outrageous spinelessness.
[/quote]
it required a bit more than this, but you are on the right track, now I'll have to begin an inquiry on who the spy is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322460878' post='2854489']
it required a bit more than this, but you are on the right track, now I'll have to begin an inquiry on who the spy is.
[/quote]
Greg23 is and always will be the spy and leak.

Now back to the classic "nou" you pulled above, and how it didnt make sense.



[quote name='SWAT128' timestamp='1322460997' post='2854493']
It's been one day guys, aren't you all being a bit impatient?
[/quote]


No, its been more than one day.

Plus they claim to know the war was coming and when, why no prepared =\

Edited by Greg23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1322461215' post='2854502']
I'm pretty sure it's been two days.
[/quote]
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322461321' post='2854507']
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?
[/quote]
Im sorry but you're asking TOP to hit you instead of you defending your new found ally?
:lol1:

Edited by Greg23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322461321' post='2854507']
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?
[/quote]

ooh yet another classic maneuver, "Come at me bro." I believe they did by attacking Polar after this treaty was signed even though it "scared" them away from attacking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322461321' post='2854507']
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?
[/quote]
We weren't the ones making big callouts on the OWF while posting a treaty that costs us one ally for no reason, were we? If you want to let us destroy your allies, we don't have any problem with it.

In short:
Sup RIA?

Edited by Yevgeni Luchenkov
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322461321' post='2854507']
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?
[/quote]
Maybe we're all just wondering why a treaty that preaches Mutual Defense is doing exactly the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shouldn't be a surprise; after winter came early, it's only natural for there to be a refractory period. Neither Polar nor RIA are spring chickens...can't expect them to be ready to go again soon after.

Edited by Schad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='DevastationStation' timestamp='1322460259' post='2854459']
"Winter Came Prematurely"

But the war was late, and everybody was pregnant with anticipation.
[/quote]
And now comes the abortion.


[OOC]Man, a Browns fan! Awesome.[/OOC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322461321' post='2854507']
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?
[/quote]

Holy crap learn to shut up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1322461321' post='2854507']
pretty sure if you want us to come in so badly you know how to correct this, you've already declared one war without a CB that have any relevance to the past 2 years, why not another?
[/quote]
We have a CB here that says you attacked a treaty partner of Argent. In our mercy, we have chosen not to use it as it took you long enough to recover from our last little skirmish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Yevgeni Luchenkov' timestamp='1322461554' post='2854516']
We weren't the ones making big callouts on the OWF while posting a treaty that costs us one ally for no reason, were we? If you want to let us destroy your allies, we don't have any problem with it.

In short:
Sup RIA?
[/quote]

Why hello there Yevgeni Luchenkov.

We don't actually mention TOP anywhere in the treaty text, I think you have us confused with Omni. It's an easy mistake to make, Omni is pretty awesome.

As for us, I would think a short perusal of our history would show that we have never once in our entire history as an alliance not honored a mutual defense clause, even if we had to fight both sides of a war. So never fear, my friends.

Edited by James Dahl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...