Jump to content

Yevgeni Luchenkov

Members
  • Content Count

    1,468
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Yevgeni Luchenkov

  • Rank
    Advanced Member
  • Birthday 10/14/1985

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    Sir_Kirdar@hotmail.com
  • Website URL
    http://
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    The Kronstadt Commune
  • Alliance Name
    The Order of the Paradox
  • Resource 1
    Aluminum
  • Resource 2
    Marble

Recent Profile Visitors

630 profile views
  1. Rayvon, your comment is entirely unacceptable as well. To encourage people to delete their nation is really shameful and not the way we ought to play this beloved game of ours.
  2. Something must be done against Rotavele. This is unacceptable behaviour.
  3. Between Tywin and him, House Baratheon's IRC private channel must have been renamed #asylum.
  4. I agree with jerdge. One paragraph, maybe two, would have been better. Still, it hit close to the mark.
  5. I would just like to point out that I am not, in any way, Jean Reno pretending to be a 19th century Russian general. You may continue.
  6. I dislike having to do it because it is strictly done out of OOC reasons (work related) but here it goes: I am resigning from the Libertarian Socialist Federation and therefore won't be engaging Nordreich nations anymore.
  7. If someone wants to know why it is taking so long for the other side to inflict "Karma" on the MK Hegemony, you just have to take a look at who the most active of their detractors are. NPO had Doitzel, Schattenmann and most of the Vox leadership (Starfox, Kingzog, Zeppelin, Martens, to name but a few). MK has SCY, Rotavele, Ogaden and Myth.
  8. If only we had known the info in the OP, we never would have allied MK back then, I'm sure. Literally the scum of this world.
  9. [quote name='Chief Savage Man' timestamp='1340735487' post='2997418'] Dude, you're not doing this correctly. The whole point of allying MK is to let them shoulder the bad PR for everything both of you do. [/quote] Dude, c'mon, there's some stuff you just don't say publicly. I thought it was known, between Umb and TOP.
  10. [quote name='Stonewall Jaxon' timestamp='1340730101' post='2997349'] Are you still so dense as to not see the sheer idiocy of treatying an alliance that had just gotten through mashing you into the ground? To MK you're a tool until you're a threat, so enjoy the "tool" portion of the cycle; I suppose it's the more fun one. Even so, signing that treaty is something so nonsensical I can't imagine what goes through your head. If someone had run me down like CnG demolished you, or demolished NPO [i]twice[/i] I wouldn't be running to their arms once they pretended to like me. How bad of a whipped d
  11. I laughed. Good one. Last two pages have been pretty good overall.
  12. [quote name='Roquentin' timestamp='1340035483' post='2987722'] Honestly, there are plenty of nations they could fight. It's not really dead weight unless you're not willing to ever leverage it in a significant fashion. I can think of one alliance they really dislike that's very big, and would have plenty of nations in range but they're not willing to rock the boat to do it. [/quote] Like who? Two "active" alliances got an upper tier that could, together, be problematic for Umbrella: TOP and Sparta. But let's say that the likelihood of those two collaborating is... low. If not, all of PF i
  13. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1339972283' post='2986669'] The fact that TOP, Umbrella and MK members constantly mock SF/XX for going to peace mode while their own alliances are doing exactly the same thing is extremely amusing to see.[/quote] We recognize using peace mode as a legitimate war tactic. However, we also recognize that some of our opponents don't use it as a war tactic but rather as a way to avoid war: see Sparta for more details. More importantly, it's not our friends who are getting butchered.
×
×
  • Create New...