Blue Lightning Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 (edited) Very good stats. Thanks for doing this. Would it be possible to add another column of damage done minus damage taken? Edited November 10, 2013 by Blue Lightning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted November 10, 2013 Report Share Posted November 10, 2013 (edited) Would it be possible to add another column of damage done minus damage taken? Oh, common man dont be that lazy. :D Indeed Ogaden, stats are great and beautifully laid out. Thank you. Why nobody did this for previous wars? :mad: ;D Edited November 11, 2013 by Branimir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Ohhh look at the ex-mk smackdown on the hero of TOP. I like it, makes my angus pepper itself. Not to defend Ardus, but I am pretty sure his political views are incredibly similar to Crymson's, Ardus is just far, far, better at being presentable than Crymson, and "respect"(whether real or simply faked) is one of the reasons why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardus Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Not to defend Ardus, but I am pretty sure his political views are incredibly similar to Crymson's, Ardus is just far, far, better at being presentable than Crymson, and "respect"(whether real or simply faked) is one of the reasons why.I think there's more than style that separates Crymson and I, though I always respect (real) and enjoy his counsel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 I think there's more than style that separates Crymson and I, though I always respect (real) and enjoy his counsel. My point was more Crymson tends to be condescending where you I believe have learned you catch more flys with honey, so to speak. I certainly consider both of you to be quite gifted at this game, I just happen to like your style better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ardus Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 (edited) My point was more Crymson tends to be condescending where you I believe have learned you catch more flys with honey, so to speak. I certainly consider both of you to be quite gifted at this game, I just happen to like your style better.My style is in large part a product of the fact that there are better "brutal" posters out there than me. Grub and Sponge have smackdowns refined to an art so efforts in that regard would probably be second-rate by comparison.Also I keep getting sucked into governments it's the worst :( Edited November 11, 2013 by Ardus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 I think there's more than style that separates Crymson and I, though I always respect (real) and enjoy his counsel. Of those two verbs, I believe the first one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcortell Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Here's some detailed stats about how much of each thing an AA has lost: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsPHjM3AY7DgdFg1b0Fia2hMSzN6dmNQNHVHeXZqQWc&usp=drive_web#gid=2 It'll get updated periodically, probably not daily. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 I think there's more than style that separates Crymson and I, though I always respect (real) and enjoy his counsel. I wonder who's better in bed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opaque Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 OGADEN WHERE ARE ZE STATS I wonder who's better in bed Beazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Sorry for the late update, had a migraine this morning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Wow, Sparta is dishing out some massive damage. Legion coming in 4th for our side. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Can someone adjust this for member inflation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 (edited) Dochartaigh, on 11 Nov 2013 - 12:31, said: Wow, Sparta is dishing out some massive damage. Legion coming in 4th for our side. o/ Edit: Nvm, I figured it out. Edited November 11, 2013 by Sir Humphrey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcortell Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 So, MI6, LoSS, MW, and Invicta are the only AA's on that side unable to do more damage than they take (excluding the small guys). No shock there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dajobo Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 I think by the end of this war when the figures also reflect the ability to not only dish damage out but sustain it as well, there will be a lot of people re-assessing their opinions about various alliances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcortell Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Can someone adjust this for member inflation I did up some stats to see the details of what people are losing (mostly just to see how much tech each AA is losing), and while they don't adjust for member inflation, you can see what AA's have gained/lost members. I posted the link a page or two back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chefjoe Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 most certainly not the only disreputable action your alliance has taken so far in this war. You would know as you are the king of disreputable actions inflicted from one alliance to another, or coalition for that matter. :ehm: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 So, MI6, LoSS, MW, and Invicta are the only AA's on that side unable to do more damage than they take (excluding the small guys). No shock there. I'm dishing out far more than I'm taking, and will do so for the entire conflict, war is easy boys and girls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 So, MI6, LoSS, MW, and Invicta are the only AA's on that side unable to do more damage than they take (excluding the small guys). No shock there. No shock that you can't read a spreadsheet either. Since all four of those alliances are dishing out more damage than their opponents based on the very spreadsheets in this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 No shock that you can't read a spreadsheet either. Since all four of those alliances are dishing out more damage than their opponents based on the very spreadsheets in this thread. Sparta is rapidly closing on taking more than they dished out though >.> Also, totally switching gears, is anyone else surprised the damage differential isn't higher? I mean the TOP side has parity or greater in every tier, more nukes and way more nations, yet the damage spread is like 800k :O Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rayvon Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Also, totally switching gears, is anyone else surprised the damage differential isn't higher? I mean the TOP side has parity or greater in every tier, more nukes and way more nations, yet the damage spread is like 800k :o Not surprised at all :smug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 No shock that you can't read a spreadsheet either. Since all four of those alliances are dishing out more damage than their opponents based on the very spreadsheets in this thread. Um. Are you sure that is the stone you want to throw? Sorry for the late update, had a migraine this morning Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 No shock that you can't read a spreadsheet either. Since all four of those alliances are dishing out more damage than their opponents based on the very spreadsheets in this thread. If you look at the summaries at the bottom, he's actually got it right. First column is damage taken, second column is damage inflicted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted November 11, 2013 Report Share Posted November 11, 2013 Sparta is rapidly closing on taking more than they dished out though >.> Also, totally switching gears, is anyone else surprised the damage differential isn't higher? I mean the TOP side has parity or greater in every tier, more nukes and way more nations, yet the damage spread is like 800k :o Yes. We aren't at the point where nukes should be all out making the number important as raw numbers, but the numbers and tiers should be allowing higher tech/wrc nations to be attacking lower tech/nonwrc nations and making a large(r) difference. Based upon the damage, and cursory examinations of pm, it seems like there isn't nearly as much of that happening as one might have expected going in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.