Ogaden Posted November 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 OK updated Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 yay! you are the best Ogaden! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 OK updated  There seems to be a distinct lack of TPF on the update mate. This means MCXA is also missing. But mostly, lack of damage statistics for any war involving TPF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 There seems to be a distinct lack of TPF on the update mate. This means MCXA is also missing. But mostly, lack of damage statistics for any war involving TPF. Â Seems to be a distinct lack of any accuracy at all tbh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 Seems to be a distinct lack of any accuracy at all tbh.  True, did not realize that this update, despite being 5 days later, shows MI6 inflicting and taking less damage than on the 10th. Not sure if wars got deleted or what is going on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coloradia Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 (edited) Thanks for the update. We're doing better than I expected these first few days. Almost 3:2 ratio even with NADC up 52 to 34 in nukes on target. Figure a nuke is roughly 1.5k NS and that makes it 2:1 if nuke counts were even. Edited November 16, 2013 by Coloradia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 True, did not realize that this update, despite being 5 days later, shows MI6 inflicting and taking less damage than on the 10th. Not sure if wars got deleted or what is going on.  It might only be tracking active wars, with expired wars not being included. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamkeatley Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 It might only be tracking active wars, with expired wars not being included. Â Nah, something else, I think. TPF is not included at all. Â GK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mompson Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 How long do wars stay in the stat download? Last war when I tried this, deleted wars were my problem. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 16, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 (edited) RI5 keeps a record of all wars, it uses the daily stats download to merely update the totals and statuses and add new wars, so deleted wars are not a problem. Nah, something else, I think. TPF is not included at all. GK True, did not realize that this update, despite being 5 days later, shows MI6 inflicting and taking less damage than on the 10th. Not sure if wars got deleted or what is going on.I think last night was a bad copy paste job, I am using a new technique to calculate everything and then copying it into google docs Edited November 16, 2013 by Ogaden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowDragon Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 (edited) Stop complaining at the sick guy! :PHe made a neat little RI5 tool for it so I may be able to help him out. These may be slightly more accurate. Let me know if anything is missing.As of last night before update:Alliance by alliance:Alliance totals: Edited November 16, 2013 by ShadowDragon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rogal Dorn Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 (edited) i love you shadow. :huh: Â you are missing Sengoku on The Last Remnants. Edited November 16, 2013 by Rogal Dorn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowDragon Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 i love you shadow. :huh: Â you are missing Sengoku on The Last Remnants.Remnants is right below doombird. You guys will on the next update as that one is from the 6pm stats yesterday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 50k-100k seems way way off for GATO-invicta. Hell In my two wars alone....... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowDragon Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 50k-100k seems way way off for GATO-invicta. Hell In my two wars alone.......Thats just Invicta on GATO which is only the wars that Invicta declared on GATO. Look down in the red section to find GATO on Invicta which shows the damage from the wars where GATO declared on Invicta which shows 371k and 719k. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 (edited) My goal is to have the highest damages done to damage taken ratio. Edited November 16, 2013 by Mogar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grahamkeatley Posted November 16, 2013 Report Share Posted November 16, 2013 Stop complaining at the sick guy! :P He made a neat little RI5 tool for it so I may be able to help him out. These may be slightly more accurate. Let me know if anything is missing. As of last night before update: Â This doesn't look right either. Did you put a date cut-off point? This has 135 wars between TPF and TOP. That just isn't happening this war. Â GK Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 (edited) This doesn't look right either. Did you put a date cut-off point? This has 135 wars between TPF and TOP. That just isn't happening this war. GKThere was a bug :v Edited November 17, 2013 by Ogaden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 New home of war statshttp://ri5.rialliance.net/warstats.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted November 17, 2013 Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 New home of war statshttp://ri5.rialliance.net/warstats.php  So, I'm just going to be that guy.  This page no longer has a last updated or as of ____ marker.  Getting that back on there would be great so its apparent when it is from.  But mostly, I wanted to say this is awesome, please keep it coming and thanks all involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted November 17, 2013 Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 New home of war statshttp://ri5.rialliance.net/warstats.php  Thanks for updating.  I apologize if this question has been asked, but what happens with deleted/expired wars ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted November 17, 2013 Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 Would it be possible to flip Inflicted & Taken in the second part? It just seems more natural that inflicted would be listed first (and it would match the format of the first part). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 Would it be possible to flip Inflicted & Taken in the second part? It just seems more natural that inflicted would be listed first (and it would match the format of the first part).The first part of the first part is damage on the attacker (damage taken) as well :V Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gopherbashi Posted November 17, 2013 Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 The first part of the first part is damage on the attacker (damage taken) as well :V Â Oh... I thought "Attacking Damage" was damage caused by the attacking alliance... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 17, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 17, 2013 I realized this was confusing people and changed the text there Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.