IYIyTh Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 Actually Sparta, Legion, and GOONs have declared more wars than you have. Obviously larger alliances so its still impressive, but you are in significantly more defensive wars than anyone on your side, making it easy for you to lead in Total Damage Inflicted/Number of Wars. TOP has done almost as much damage with half the amount of wars though. That being said, MI6 is one of the few alliances with barely anyone in peace mode from what I've seen, so kudos. Stop pretending you aren't jelly Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 You're also leading in damage taken. :) Tis but a flesh wound! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 You're also leading in damage taken. :) Our relationship with NPO is an abusive one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krashnaia Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 You're also leading in damage taken. :) Blame me for missing this, as we couldn't be more proud. Thanks for remembering. B-) o/ Casualties Saladjoe: Declare more wars or GTFO, you peace-mode warriors. :P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
arentak Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 Some alliances do 12k dmg per war, some alliances do...750 dmg per war. Staggeringly different numbers, probably based on which tier was deployed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farnsworth Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 These stats are pretty great, but, Ogaden, would you mind putting a column for damage ratios on the "alliance" tab? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prodigal Moon Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 2.7 vs. 1.9 mil NS? Guys, we need to get these numbers up. I'm not being partisan, I mean all around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Kremlin Posted November 7, 2013 Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 Some alliances do 12k dmg per war, some alliances do...750 dmg per war. Staggeringly different numbers, probably based on which tier was deployed. There are some interesting differences for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 7, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2013 (edited) New damage totals :vMan nearly a million damage a day, at this rate everyone will be dead by Christmas Edited November 7, 2013 by Ogaden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 (edited) How does Valhalla have so little damage taken/dealt for so many wars? LoSS is a low NS alliance and has double with about the same amount of wars.. Edited November 8, 2013 by Penlugue Solaris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How does Valhalla have so little damage taken/dealt for so many wars? LoSS is a low NS alliance and has double with about the same amount of wars.. Check the nuclear reports. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimaera Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Shh, don't point it out. They're being very sneaky! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnGulager Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How does Valhalla have so little damage taken/dealt for so many wars? LoSS is a low NS alliance and has double with about the same amount of wars.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How does Valhalla have so little damage taken/dealt for so many wars? LoSS is a low NS alliance and has double with about the same amount of wars.. Valhalla appears to have pm'ed 57.5% of all their tech, which doesn't count the top tech guys that haven't declared or hit peace mode. Out of the top 30 nations by tech (above 5.2k), so far there has been a total of 2 declared wars (1 just happened ~15 minutes ago). Oh yeah, and the whole nukes thing. But even without that, it appears that Valhalla is being saved as a strategic reserve. In contrast, percent of tech in PM: Fark -- 7% NpO -- 9% Sparta -- 11% Loss -- 35% Umb -- 40% TOP - 44% So Valhalla's definitely got a lot of extra firepower lying around as a percentage, even compaed to the people getting attacked for it (TOP). In terms of nukes, none of the 14 nations Valhalla could nuke were nuked on 11/5. Only 1 Valhalla nation total was nuked the first day, and then only 1 Valhalla nation nuked an NPO nation on 11/6 returning fire on that sender. Which is a pretty crazy streak of a coincidence, or means people get to debate NPO making a deal with the enemy 2 wars in a row. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How does Valhalla have so little damage taken/dealt for so many wars? LoSS is a low NS alliance and has double with about the same amount of wars.. Hehehehe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 (edited) added total damage war-wide all fronts. TOTAL DAMAGE ALL WARS 7,719,087.33 Edited November 8, 2013 by Ogaden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Overlord Shinnra Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Which is a pretty crazy streak of a coincidence, or means people get to debate NPO making a deal with the enemy 2 wars in a row. It is common knowledge now that the deal has been made. It is far more beneficial for NPO to make such a deal then Valhalla. Shrewd move. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Stukov II Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How did NPO ever get Valhalla to agree to that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcortell Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How did NPO ever get Valhalla to agree to that? It probably isn't that difficult to get Val to agree to anything, really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 How did NPO ever get Valhalla to agree to that? Well, we dont know who proposed what to whom? It is logical that it would be my alliance, but you nor I, know. At this point though, it is beside the point. I can say that nukes are flying now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcortell Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 (edited) Well, we dont know who proposed what to whom? It is logical that it would be my alliance, but you nor I, know. At this point though, it is beside the point. I can say that nukes are flying now. "Everyone figured it out. We don't need to look worse, start launching nukes." Edited November 8, 2013 by bcortell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chimaera Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 "Everyone figured it out. We don't need to look worse, start launching nukes." Ding Ding Ding Ding! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branimir Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 I understand people have a hard on for NPO though I fail to see how one could spin to make NPO a villian here. Vall only wars NPO. So it effects only the two parties. NPO is outgunned. Any relief would be nice. That a deal could have been made would be only smart for NPO. Alas it didnt happen. It would be good for coalition in which NPO finds it self as that would mean more strenght of NPO on other alliances which fight other coalition members and it. Also, in regards to the previous dig on us--we had allies on the other side last war. Not the case this war. But please do spread in game propaganda nonsense even in this ooc venue. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibsonator21 Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 I don't blame NPO for it, personally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 I understand people have a hard on for NPO though I fail to see how one could spin to make NPO a villian here. Vall only wars NPO. So it effects only the two parties. NPO is outgunned. Any relief would be nice. That a deal could have been made would be only smart for NPO. Alas it didnt happen. It would be good for coalition in which NPO finds it self as that would mean more strenght of NPO on other alliances which fight other coalition members and it. Also, in regards to the previous dig on us--we had allies on the other side last war. Not the case this war. But please do spread in game propaganda nonsense even in this ooc venue. If your calling this an ic dig, I have no idea why. I honestly don't know how that could have been said more neutrally. You think people won't debate it? Or just mentioning that they might is somehow ic propoganda? :wacko: Which is a pretty crazy streak of a coincidence, or means people get to debate NPO making a deal with the enemy 2 wars in a row. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.