Merrie Melodies Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 You probably just thought I was still there. Go check the date of my resignation thread if you have to. He can't he ran away from RoK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nintenderek Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Don't you have another alliance to run away from on the eve of war? You put on track shoes and ran from Ragnarok so fast when the orders came down to hit NV and OcUK I think you may have set an indoor record at 100 meters. You mean he started fighting for what he believes in? That's a lot better then what you've become. I use to know a Chairman Hal who fought for what he believed in. He fought for freedom and cared about others besides those in his own alliance. That man never would have joined an alliance like Valhalla, allied directly to the alliance he hated most. That man is obviously dead, because you are not him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kung Fu Geeks Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Fact: you suck at facting because VE did not end them, what Impero said was out of context and not part of the negotiations. Im sorry, but when two alliance leaders have discussions regarding the issue, it is part of negotiations, regardless of the setting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leftbehind Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Ballroom or hip hop? hip hop. I like to feel the beat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilselu1 Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Red Straw was the short one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ventus ex Gutter Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 So it begins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Once again I say, If those who are calling for the death of NPO "win" what are going to be the surrender terms under this new golden age? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikz Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Goodbye NPO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 I thought the best reply to the whole spying issue was OV's side claiming they didn't mind Screen Shots of their Gov forums circulating CN as long as nobody was seeking them. Who minds that kind of thing? I would mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Requia Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) Edit: I seem to have been wrong here, removed to prevent disinformation (see followup post on the next page). Edited April 21, 2009 by Requia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 You fired the first shot, knowing the world is against you. Such arrogance to think you can still win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proxian Empire Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 How ironic for Chairman Hal to be fighting against the freedom he so 'righteously' desired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Tard Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Once again I say,If those who are calling for the death of NPO "win" what are going to be the surrender terms under this new golden age? who said they get terms? what if we treat them like They treated FAN? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTTofAK Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Red Straw was the short one... Red straw and brown straw are the same length. Even your propaganda fails. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amoshu Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 [9:17pm] Crymson[TOP]: Would OV be willing to accept one round of wars on SethB? [9:18pm] Archon`away: Allow me to inquire. [9:20pm] Archon`away: I assume, as Crymson proposed this, that it is not an official offfer? [9:21pm] Crymson[TOP]: No membership restrictions, no public apology, etc. [9:21pm] Crymson[TOP]: Moo? [9:21pm] Dani_C: we're maintaining our stance as outlined earlier [9:21pm] Moo-cows: so then you are refusing that offer? [9:22pm] Dani_C: if seth is going to be hit, so is mhawk [9:22pm] Dani_C: that is OV's official stance Talks were over. IMPERO ENDING DISCUSSIONS LAST NIGHT:[23:46] <Impero[VE]> rayvon is willing to give the choice to seth on his own[23:47] <Impero[VE]> to resign and appologise [23:47] <Impero[VE]> and face ZI [23:48] <Impero[VE]> <@sethb[OV-DepMoFO]> I will not see OV come to any harm on my behalf [23:48] <Impero[VE]> ^and seth will do that [23:54] <Impero[VE]> nevermind, change of plans [23:54] <Impero[VE]> im sorry. [23:55] <Impero[VE]> it would happen anyway [23:55] <Impero[VE]> our allies would defend seth as a person [23:55] <Impero[VE]> no one will have this !@#$ anymore from them [23:55] <Impero[VE]> im sorry [23:55] <Impero[VE]> theres no more to discuss [23:55] <Impero[VE]> the matter should have never been brought up Which log do you want to stick by, Moo? You've given both as reasons for the discussion to be ended. I suppose it's convenient to have one or the other, just in case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord of Destruction Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 who said they get terms?what if we treat them like They treated FAN? Then you become the monster you hate so much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilselu1 Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Red straw and brown straw are the same length. Even your propaganda fails. Never said red straw didn't stack the odds in it's favor, stickem or crazy glue or smthn... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterShadow Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 who said they get terms?what if we treat them like They treated FAN? Well it seems that a lot of people on that side push the removal of EZI, the ridding of "cruel" surrender terms etc. If I am misguided in this I apologize but I thought that was the rally call of Anti NPO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iosif Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Farewell, NPO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bernkastel Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 (edited) Then you become the monster you hate so much Well, it would be and is Karma. Edited April 21, 2009 by Balsamic Vinegar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Then you become the monster you hate so much Or maybe it's just "punishment to fit the crime" such as you have applied it to FAN and ourselves? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Tard Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Then you become the monster you hate so much so you admit to being the D-bags of CN? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leprecon Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 To those that believe VE ended the discussions and believe that the following quote was from discussions on the day the war was declared [23:46] <Impero[VE]> rayvon is willing to give the choice to seth on his own[23:47] <Impero[VE]> to resign and appologise [23:47] <Impero[VE]> and face ZI [23:48] <Impero[VE]> <@sethb[OV-DepMoFO]> I will not see OV come to any harm on my behalf [23:48] <Impero[VE]> ^and seth will do that [23:54] <Impero[VE]> nevermind, change of plans [23:54] <Impero[VE]> im sorry. [23:55] <Impero[VE]> it would happen anyway [23:55] <Impero[VE]> our allies would defend seth as a person [23:55] <Impero[VE]> no one will have this !@#$ anymore from them [23:55] <Impero[VE]> im sorry [23:55] <Impero[VE]> theres no more to discuss [23:55] <Impero[VE]> the matter should have never been brought up I give you this 4/20/2009 11:43:25 PM"Hola" [Team: Red] Kunakistan Ruler: paintball464 New Pacific Order [Team: Green] Glaslin Ruler: Washing Georgeton Ordo Verde Currently Fighting 4/20/2009 11:43:10 PM "Hi." [Team: Red] Arctaria Ruler: BLUELINE976 New Pacific Order [Team: Green] black Ruler: blackness Ordo Verde Currently Fighting 4/20/2009 11:43:00 PM "WAR" [Team: Red] Seriatim Ruler: Brenann New Pacific Order [Team: Green] Smoochtopia Ruler: Sugarbutt Ordo Verde Currently Fighting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Spice Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Looks like NPO's allies are hiding. I don't blame them, this is like a bonfire and we're just throwing NPO on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted April 21, 2009 Report Share Posted April 21, 2009 Well it seems that a lot of people on that side push the removal of EZI, the ridding of "cruel" surrender terms etc. If I am misguided in this I apologize but I thought that was the rally call of Anti NPO Is that the rallying cry within NPO now? "Hey guys! Think of it this way, even if we lose they cant put us on any EZI lists!" "Right?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts