Jump to content

erikz

Members
  • Content Count

    2,164
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About erikz

  • Rank
    Non Grata !@#$%*
  • Birthday 03/18/1984

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.non-grata.net
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Leiden, the Netherlands

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Twinte
  • Alliance Name
    Non Grata
  • Resource 1
    Cattle
  • Resource 2
    Pigs

Recent Profile Visitors

882 profile views
  1. Well, I'm all for giving new people just a slap on the wrist and let them keep one nation (if they aren't ban evaders or whatever) so they can enjoy the game without getting banned on the first day of joining CN.
  2. RV just rull them yourself. This will bring back the holy blue in no time! You have the power to change this by yourself RV
  3. 34. He makes alliances disband: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=104057
  4. Seriously, who cares about a CB? If you want war, then start one. If you don't want war, go into peace mode or leave the effin game.
  5. I'm more a Virginia Tech kinda guy.
  6. I wanted the Black Caps in the final....
  7. Did you really miss the sarcasm there...?
  8. erikz

    Don't Turtle

    What's turtling?
  9. As far as I've heard that's not the case here: Xiph ultimate goal, stemming from his ulterior motives, is the disbandment of UPN. In my eyes this is deplorable and should be made punishable by admin. Making the game impossible to play for others, forcing rerolls to ZI etc, is just the poorest of forms.
  10. http://www.cybernations.net/search_wars.asp?searchstring=Declaring_Alliance%2CReceiving_Alliance&search=Global%20Order%20of%20Darkness&anyallexact=exact Sure. No announcement doesn't mean no war.
  11. Lol, twist it anyway you want, you know as well as I do that there is no reasoning with Xiph about giving UPN white peace. The GATO and FHU peace agreements are normal yes, but they do not in any way cancel out what Xiph is trying to pull on UPN.
  12. Its clear we differ in opinion here, I think a no re-entry clause is something that secures your allies and yourselves, because it prevents an alliance from hopping in and out of war when it suits them. The alliance which signs the clause isn't hurt in any way (economically, military or any other way. Anyways, I was writing this blog because someone is trying to play some sort of evil overlord-admin here, which is very wrong.
×
×
  • Create New...