Baron Terror Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 (edited) [url=http://smg.photobucket.com/user/jibjab99/media/int-icon.png.html][/URL] INT has recently elected a new government! [insert crappy election post theme here] Dear Leader: Comrade Craig Eternal President: Comrade Trotsky Glorious Liaison Commissar: Baron Terror Martial Commissar: soultak3r1 Treasury Commissar: Lexie Membership Commissar: Azreal Also remember posting drunk is a bad idea... Edited December 9, 2013 by Baron Terror Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 (edited) Trotsky back in INT gov, disbandment eminent. congratulations to those elected though! edit: also obligatory inb4everyone. Edited December 8, 2013 by Mogar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shimmer Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 I'm liking the Gov. Congrats INT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Bromeini Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 We got the band back together after all. Time to make the magic happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roadie Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 May the Craigocracy forever prosper! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 I'm sure this government of INT will lead the alliance to be faithful to its allies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YOLO SWAG Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 C'est la lutte finale!Good luck comrades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Something I noticed: Alternative Title: "% of INT gov with bad names" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azreal Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Something I noticed: Alternative Title: "% of INT gov with bad names" Your maths is wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enamel32 Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 (edited) Your maths is wrong. No actually. I assume he's differentiating High gov and middle gov as the people in the OP. 2 high gov positions, 2 high gov members with "comrade" in the name. %of high gov members with "comrade" in their name: 100% 4 low gov positions, 0 low gov members with "comrade" in their name. % of high gov members with comrade in their name: 0% 6 total positions, 2 with comrade in their name. 33% of gov has comrade in their name. In conclusion, the chart is marked correctly. Anyway, I'd like to hail this announcement, but the 100% of high government with comrade in their name makes me want to vomit. Edited December 8, 2013 by Enamel32 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevolutionaryRebel Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 THey've lost the momentum, but they keep on rolling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Comrades where they should be: at the vanguard in the inevitable triumph of the proletariat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dvdcchn Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 good to see you back Craig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 (edited) I too enjoyed the Comrade X thing, haha. Congratulations to INT's new/returning government! :) Edited December 8, 2013 by Kurdanak Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir pwnage Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Something I noticed: Alternative Title: "% of INT gov with bad names" There is no "high" or "low" gov in INT. We are all equals in the socialist paradise. Except I'm more equal than everyone else. And Jacob sucks. But everyone else is a nice, amorphous socialist blob. As things should be. For the glory of the revolution. With liberty, and justice, for all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keysariyt Hanssen Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Something I noticed: Alternative Title: "% of INT gov with bad names" By alternative title you mean correct title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azreal Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 There is no "high" or "low" gov in INT. We are all equals in the socialist paradise. Except I'm more equal than everyone else. And Jacob sucks. But everyone else is a nice, amorphous socialist blob. As things should be. For the glory of the revolution. With liberty, and justice, for all. I was tempted to point out that anyone with Commisar is high gov and trots is low gov and technically shouldn't have been on this announcement at all but the amount of times explains how INT works to people seems to fall on death ears so they can get a few cheap digs in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 I was tempted to point out that anyone with Commisar is high gov and trots is low gov and technically shouldn't have been on this announcement at all but the amount of times explains how INT works to people seems to fall on death ears so they can get a few cheap digs in. You caught me! If you get this bothered over your gov levels [apparently] being mischaracterized in an amusing bar graph, maybe you should have a more straightforward gov layout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azreal Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 (edited) You caught me! If you get this bothered over your gov levels [apparently] being mischaracterized in an amusing bar graph, maybe you should have a more straightforward gov layout. Commissars are high gov, Secretaries are not. Sorry that was so complicated for you. Edited December 8, 2013 by Azreal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Bromeini Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 (edited) I was tempted to point out that anyone with Commisar is high gov and trots is low gov and technically shouldn't have been on this announcement at all but the amount of times explains how INT works to people seems to fall on death ears so they can get a few cheap digs in. Need I remind you that GenSec shares the exact same powers that GenCom does, with the exception of an emergency powers/War Council vote, a biumvirate of sorts if one wanted to incorrectly view any position within the alliance as "high gov". So :P If you want to get technical about it, there is no high gov in INT. Commissariats serve the purpose of organizing and upkeeping certain facets of the alliance in lines with the will of congress, deriving any power they may have from the will of the people. ALL POWER TO THE GENERAL CONGRESS Edited December 8, 2013 by Ayatollah Bromeini Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azreal Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Need I remind you that GenSec shares the exact same powers that GenCom does, with the exception of an emergency powers/War Council vote. So :P If you want to get technical about it, there is no high gov in INT. Commissariats serve the purpose of organizing and upkeeping certain facets of the alliance in lines with the will of congress, deriving any power they may have from the will of the people. ALL POWER TO THE GENERAL CONGRESS Technically only in the absence of the GenComm, and we all know you can't make a decision without Craig signing off on it. And we all know Q is really in charge of everything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 All power to the soviets! Death to the oligarchs! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerschbs Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Interesting lineup you have there Int. Good luck. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crownguard Posted December 8, 2013 Report Share Posted December 8, 2013 Congratulations on the new line-up INT and good luck with running the show. I am sure you'll do a great job with it. Things are looking pretty open for you in the next few months. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sovyet Gelibolu Posted December 9, 2013 Report Share Posted December 9, 2013 Need I remind you that GenSec shares the exact same powers that GenCom does, with the exception of an emergency powers/War Council vote, a biumvirate of sorts if one wanted to incorrectly view any position within the alliance as "high gov". So :P The word for a two-person leadership is "duumvirate". What you say about the relationship between GenCom and GenSec is true of any Commissar and his or her Secretary. And Azreal's wrong about Secretaries only being empowered by the absence of their Commissars. Do you people know how your alliance works? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.