Jump to content

Our dear leader returns


Recommended Posts

Technically only in the absence of the GenComm, and we all know you can't make a decision without Craig signing off on it.

 

re: SG. That's not really how the GenCom/Sec dynamic has been in the past, there's no codified "signing off" process, with one usually making a decision whenever they deem it appropriate to do so. A discussion not meant for these dirty bourgeois eyes though, sadly.

Edited by Ayatollah Bromeini
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

re: SG. That's not really how the GenCom/Sec dynamic has been in the past, there's no codified "signing off" process, with one usually making a decision whenever they deem it appropriate to do so. A discussion not meant for these dirty bourgeois eyes though, sadly.

 

Who you callin' bourgeois? :war:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

You caught me!

 

If you get this bothered over your gov levels [apparently] being mischaracterized in an amusing bar graph, maybe you should have a more straightforward gov layout.

 

 

What part of "Leftist alliance" gave you the impression we would have a straighforward gov layout?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

re: SG. That's not really how the GenCom/Sec dynamic has been in the past, there's no codified "signing off" process, with one usually making a decision whenever they deem it appropriate to do so. A discussion not meant for these dirty bourgeois eyes though, sadly.

 

I thought you couldn't vote on CC matters. Also, I'm horrified that you would have the same amount of power of Craig considering what you were accused of a few weeks ago. :v:

Edited by Opaque
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I thought you couldn't vote on CC matters. Also, I'm horrified that you would have the same amount of power of Craig considering what you were accused of a few weeks ago. :v:

 

The CC matters that are brought up once or twice every year when we go to war? Yeah I mentioned that :P

 

I've been accused of worse things. It won't be the last time I'm accused of awful things, either. I'm a rotten bastard, it's kind of my thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The word for a two-person leadership is "duumvirate".  What you say about the relationship between GenCom and GenSec is true of any Commissar and his or her Secretary.  And Azreal's wrong about Secretaries only being empowered by the absence of their Commissars.
 
Do you people know how your alliance works?


Well that just makes the incorrect math even worse.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

What part of "Leftist alliance" gave you the impression we would have a straighforward gov layout?

 

This is why gulags and re-education camps are necessary.  Only way they learn!

 

Congrats on another fine government comrades!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is why gulags and re-education camps are necessary.  Only way they learn!

 

Congrats on another fine government comrades!

I have to admit, whenever I think about leftist alliances in BobSteveiterra, Hogan's Heroes is the first thing that comes to mind. ;)

Edited by x Tela x
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...