Jump to content

RevolutionaryRebel

Banned
  • Content Count

    1,194
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About RevolutionaryRebel

  • Rank
    No matching nation

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Here

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    ThisNationForRent
  • Resource 1
    Coal
  • Resource 2
    Uranium
  1. Exploiting treaties is an old practise, nothing new. Such 'tactics' (including but not limited to those mentioned) have been exploited and shaped several coalition-based wars - not just this one. Is it reasonable to expect victims of such Realist/Cynical tactics to ignore a clear opportunity for wielding them against their foes? It's a very strong temptation, you'd have to admit. Especially when the enemies are more or less the same and the memories are still clear in their minds. Knowing this, both sides play the same game, fearing to be outwitted by those opposite, or performing 'damage control' to limit the losses on their side. Or, at least the members on their side they actually care about (don't worry Aftermath, I'm sure daddy polar loves you as deeply as their other BAEs). I look forward to you bucking the trend in the future, rather than stating what everyone knows.
  2. The blog system won't let me rate this 0 stars and that makes me truly disappointed.
  3. I've casually played King's Indian openings, alongside Benko's and Larsen's. I don't have the time/skill to focus on highly developed opening theory, so I deliberately focus on flexible strategies. Younger players seem to have a harder time defending against flanchetto bishops, which isn't surprising since most people are taught open game tactics first at a beginner level. I personally make too many mid-game blunders to fully exploit this approach, but it's fun to play, especially against people unprepared to face it. Best played conservatively, imo, to avoid overplaying and let opponents stretch themselves in the middle.
  4. My first real war was WotC. Invicta had a very soft lower tier back in 2008. Others will need training, though so I'll appreciate the workout.
  5. To: Methrage Date: 8/20/2014 10:19:18 PM Subject: War Declared! Message: War has been declared on you by RevolutionaryRebel for the following reason: At least I have chicken From: Methrage Date: 8/20/2014 10:14:43 PM Subject: Reason for war? Message: Do you have one? From: RevolutionaryRebel Date: 8/20/2014 10:15:10 PM Subject: RE: Reason for war? Message: Do you have a reason for &%$@posting?
  6. 'Morality When Convenient' is a better descriptor. That is well and truly alive & kicking. The number of people that are genuinely moralist is about as low as you'd expect. Moralism doesn't bother me, nor does honest scummery. It's the dishonest ones that parade their purported ideals which are worthy of derision. What use are ideals unless they are applied and tested through action?
  7. DoomSquad's chequebook is far too large for me to compete with them this year. Ruining the game, and all that.
  8. Scrub. I miss the hypno-mad emote from negative popularity...
  9. forget the winter olympics, how about Survivor - Ukraine Edition? I'd definitely make something for that
  10. This. Additionally, where would one receive the lashes? I for one would prefer to be lashed on the arse as opposed to say, the face or genitals. honestly don't see the point of this. Reminds me of how some states of the US still have castration as a punishment for certain sex offences.
  11. Fair opinion, reasonable assessment, terrible execution. 6/10, will read again.
  12. the pixels are always brighter on the other side; I do admit being caught up in hopes and dreams sometimes, but I try not to focus on them too much
  13. So, hang on; all that BS you've been spouting in the OWF is HB policies and opinions and not your own? wow
×
×
  • Create New...