HDSupreme Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 To the Non Grata Nations & Leadership: I was wrong in sending aid to a rogue nation who is currently being ZI'd by Non Grata. It was clearly stated on the OWF that these nations were not to be aided in any way, but I made the mistake of sending them money. I am sorry for any trouble I caused Non Grata and hope the reparations sent by my alliance will be able to take care of any damages done. This will not happen again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Aww :) That was very nice of you HDSupreme. o/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 It's the one soldier included with the tech deal request that makes it a bit obvious that there was no ignorance of the aid embargo involved. Try harder, ok? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 It's the one soldier included with the tech deal request that makes it a bit obvious that there was no ignorance of the aid embargo involved. Try harder, ok?This is me unironically agreeing with a ChairmanHal post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 It's the one soldier included with the tech deal request that makes it a bit obvious that there was no ignorance of the aid embargo involved. Try harder, ok? [url=http://www.cybernations.net/search_aid.asp?searchstring=All&search=RichPortWaves]He actually sends a soldier with every deal.[/url] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valves Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 It's the one soldier included with the tech deal request that makes it a bit obvious that there was no ignorance of the aid embargo involved. Try harder, ok? Normally I'd agree with you, but if you look at his nation's aid history he's always sent that one soldier, even with tech deals. That soldier doesn't really lend itself to any conclusion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Yeah I thought the 1 soldier thing was a slap in the face too, but now it seems it's just a quirk (albeit a weird one) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Holton Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 This is going to make me cry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChairmanHal Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) Normally I'd agree with you, but if you look at his nation's aid history he's always sent that one soldier, even with tech deals. That soldier doesn't really lend itself to any conclusion. If he does it with everyone ok I guess, but the timing of it was rather unfortunate because it looks really bad from here and I'm not alone in thinking so. Edited June 9, 2013 by ChairmanHal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Uruk Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) Eh, if he does it with everyone no harm I guess.EDIT: OH MY GOD TWICE :( Edited June 9, 2013 by Neo Uruk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex987 Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Lol, I think the 1 soldier is carrying the sack of 3 mil to the other nation in every deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 I've seen other people do it, but it's all about sending some of your drunker national representatives to "start a party" or whatever. O_o Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
valves Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) Lol, I think the 1 soldier is carrying the sack of 3 mil to the other nation in every deal. Haha, that's not a bad theory. Edited June 9, 2013 by valves Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helbrecht Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Think of that one soldier as the one guarding the shipment to ensure it reaches. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 He actually sends a soldier with every deal. It's the driver. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Lol, I think the 1 soldier is carrying the sack of 3 mil to the other nation in every deal. Makes sense. I always just shoot the money out of a cannon to other nations Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 and here I was using electronic transfers. I had no idea you could make a soldier walk with all the cash. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 It's the one soldier included with the tech deal request that makes it a bit obvious that there was no ignorance of the aid embargo involved. Try harder, ok? Do. something. about. it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjunqun Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) As Non Grata deals with its current rogue issues, I'm coming to the OWF to politely ask that people stop sending aid to http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=185740 and http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=64823 Despite what they may promise, you won't be recieving any tech from them, and you'll be earning my ire very quickly. If this keeps happening, your alliance will be held responsible for the actions of its membership. Consider this fair warning. -Caustic-ncc-Titonow, now..EDIT: wrong quote. Edited June 9, 2013 by cjunqun Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 I have to hand it to NG for finding an appropriate response to the offenses of OP, and just as importantly, to OP for making the apology and doing what was necessary to atone for his actions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Is this real? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjunqun Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Is this real?this is called the open apology. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Well, NG is certainly going above and beyond in reasonableness during roguery. Considering they aren't huge NpO fans and that Avalanche guy handed them a CB, you have to give them props for dealing with this diplomatically. o/ NG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamthey Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 (edited) Well props to NG then, I'm just pleasantly surprised the guy/alliance took responsibility for the mistake. Coolio. Edited June 9, 2013 by iamthey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conistonslim Posted June 9, 2013 Report Share Posted June 9, 2013 Well, NG is certainly going above and beyond in reasonableness during roguery. Considering they aren't huge NpO fans and that Avalanche guy handed them a CB, you have to give them props for dealing with this diplomatically. o/ NG Or NG doesn't have all their ducks in a row... could be that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.