jayhova804 Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Best of luck to both our allies moving forward. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob the Malignant Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1348717497' post='3034601'] . . . a year ago. Big. Whoop. All this shows is that INT was scheming against its own ally for a year. Which shouldn't surprise anyone given their treatment of allies from SOS to LSF across a span of years. Rush, I'm going to put this in plain terms for you: Everyone--friends and otherwise--who knows anything is laughing at you. Not with you. People you respect and confide in are laughing [b]at[/b] you. So yuck it up, dumbass, everyone else is. [/quote] A year ago? Try this past June. As in, 3 months ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Normis Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Any treaty cancellations suck to see. Hope it works out for both parties involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Jacob the Malignant' timestamp='1348718560' post='3034607'] A year ago? Try this past June. As in, 3 months ago. [/quote] The "coup" screenshot is dated November 2011. But I'm sure you're correct in the sense that INT has probably been undermining the government of UCR as recently as yesterday. I fail to see how you're conflating SSes showing INT conspiring to coup and/or shanghai UCR as a moral failing on the part of VL and not INT. Edited September 27, 2012 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 UCR is the worse! Why cancel on the best ally you can ask for? The International is trustworthy, loyal and would defend you no matter what, shame on you UCR! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crownguard Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) Maybe we can merge this thread into the other one to get 50 pages of the same terrible posts after all. -CG Edited September 27, 2012 by Crownguard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canik Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 I guess UCR is planning on intentionally provoking NoR, and has honorably decided not to try and drag INT into it. Good show, UCR. Show LSF how it's done. (Congrats INT) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='Crownguard' timestamp='1348720931' post='3034621'] Maybe we can merge this thread into the other one to get 50 pages of the same terrible posts after all. -CG [/quote] May be more alliances understands the true nature of The INT and we get one hundred pages then, way better huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saniiro Matsudaira Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Unfortunate such things must happen to two alliances. Good luck to INT and UCR. Also, it seems I am late to see everyone $@%&#ng on INT. Never change. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kankou Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 So the Communist-Anarchist Split continues into new regions. Why am I not surprised? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudolph Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='Saniiro Matsudaira' timestamp='1348723876' post='3034658'] Also, it seems I am late to see everyone $@%&#ng on INT. Never change. [/quote] As long as you promise to never change as well, Saniiro Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurunin Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='Rogal Dorn' timestamp='1348710838' post='3034544'] In this thread International cries some more. [/quote] Correction - In this thread INT log dumps/leaks SS before someone else does it on them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Buscemi Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 It's okay to cancel, but this was classless. I don't know who you are, but now whenever I see UCR I'll think of that nobody alliance that took a cheap shot at a former ally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ch33kY Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) Looks like The International just shifted some more dead weight. UCR and LSF want to role play the glory of the Communists whereas The International want to be a strong CN alliance with a Communist theme. That's the difference here. Edited September 27, 2012 by Ch33kY Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Jgoods45' timestamp='1348709669' post='3034528'] <3 INT Forever and ever. Anything that allows C&G to be less tied to that other bloc is nothing but a good thing. Congrats my friends. [/quote] [color="#9ACD32"]>being a DH meatshield[/color] omg this is the best FA strat evar! [color="#9ACD32"]>actually attempting to have an FA strategy that isnt entirely reliant on MK keeping themselves without a massive target on their back[/color] WHY WOULD ANYONE EVER DO THIS? SO STUPID! [quote name='Ch33kY' timestamp='1348729787' post='3034684'] Looks like The International just shifted some more dead weight. UCR and LSF want to role play the glory of the Communists whereas The International want to be a strong CN alliance with a Communist theme. That's the difference here. [/quote] ooc: some of us actually believe there should be an IC. Edited September 27, 2012 by Mogar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 The irony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elorian Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Oh Lordy. ANOTHER trollololol thread. Well, good for you, enjoy your 15 seconds of fame. Rock on INT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hiro Nakara Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Good luck UCR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azreal Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 This is tasteless VL and I truly thought you where better than this sort of shamless grandstanding. The fact that your propogating a half truth in order to give your self and your current alliance the moral high ground just makes it worse. The fact that you post what is a huge slap in face and then talk about remaining ambiable and respectful is laughable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 Hope you're proud of yourself VL. Also congrats to INT, losing an ally of Rectum is never a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crownguard Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1348722289' post='3034635'] May be more alliances understands the true nature of The INT and we get one hundred pages then, way better huh? [/quote] We can only be so lucky to get your enlightened opinion about our character for another 70 pages. Please lead the way, your opinions about why we suck certainly remain at the center of my attention, sirrah. -CG Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sir pwnage Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1348719893' post='3034616'] I fail to see how you're conflating SSes showing INT conspiring to coup and/or shanghai UCR as a moral failing on the part of VL and not INT. [/quote] ...because it's literally VL saying it. That's why it's a failing on the part of VL. Because he is literally the one speaking. How... how do you miss that? I wasn't going to touch this thread until I saw that little edit of his. For VL to say that he worked on improving relations, when in reality he just wanted to get UCR to merge and call it a day, was astounding to me. This is the guy who proposed moving to Red because UCR was having internal issues and he thought it would be a good time to finally accomplish his goal of assimilating them into us. And because I'm doing this now, and it's super relevant because you're mentioned once: http://imageshack.us/a/img443/1944/vl5.png and then http://imageshack.us/a/img31/8690/vl7.png and then http://imageshack.us/a/img694/8626/vl6.png Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 [quote name='Ch33kY' timestamp='1348729787' post='3034684'] Looks like The International just shifted some more dead weight. UCR and LSF want to role play the glory of the Communists whereas The International want to be a strong CN alliance with a Communist theme. That's the difference here. [/quote] That must be why their leadership is incompetent and they have no honor. [quote name='Azreal' timestamp='1348748061' post='3034725'] This is tasteless VL and I truly thought you where better than this sort of shamless grandstanding. The fact that your propogating a half truth in order to give your self and your current alliance the moral high ground just makes it worse. The fact that you post what is a huge slap in face and then talk about remaining ambiable and respectful is laughable. [/quote] C&G is terrible, they gave them the moral highground just by been themselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IYIyTh Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) Am I the only one failing to see how sir pwnage's screenshots of VL advocating better relations with UCR is damning? So what if there was always the bonus of if things turned sour they could merge into Int? How is that relevant to whatever happened in the past year or recent months that led specifically to this cancellation? Or relevant to a new leadership under VL? Am I missing something? Edited September 27, 2012 by IYIyTh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crownguard Posted September 27, 2012 Report Share Posted September 27, 2012 (edited) Please tell us how you really feel. We haven't all heard about it yet. I'm sure someone will come back and complain about how INT has no honor, we get what we deserve and so on for many more pages by people who aren't involved at all. Normally it would be very interesting to sit here in a pointless debate with no one who is directly involved obviously having intimate knowledge about our character...but some of us lack the ability to hit refresh all day and host a future radio show on the topic. Spoiled the next few (dozen?) pages. Sorry about that, wanted to save the time of anyone who believed something meaningful would arise out of this. Good luck to VL, I suppose. -CG EDIT: If you feel compelled to actually argue the point in a cogent manner, come by our IRC channel and look me up when I'm around. I know it is more fun and far less intellectually taxing to write witty rejoinders in a paragraph and dip out, but at least the offer is there for you. Edited September 27, 2012 by Crownguard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.