Seerow Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Rafael Nadal' timestamp='1326398017' post='2898211'] MK WOULD WIN ON A FINAL POSSESSION DRIVE BY TIM TEBOW [/quote] This is an underrated post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Avakael Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Ardus' timestamp='1326410209' post='2898326'] We already beat them in war and in tech buying, I'm not sure what more you want us to do to them. [/quote] Prove you're still hypothetically better at constructing a good set of allies. At the end, you can point out that TOP is actually one of those really good allies, and therefore nothing is "done" to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1326417862' post='2898420'] This is why I signed a treaty with you back in 2007. Or was it 2008? [/quote] And we even got along well for a few weeks after it was signed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1326404276' post='2898248'] "I can't wait until saturday to prove this wrong" implies he will be the one doing the proving. Since Tebow plays the patriots, one can only assume he (Mogar) plays for the Pats. [/quote] Or he's a crazy who is gonna get to Tebow before or after the game (Hopefully before because I have money on the Pats ) [quote name='Bob Ilyani' timestamp='1326404606' post='2898253'] You are correct to a certain extent... there are a few loose ties there, it is true. But to imply that a tie was imminent or in any sort of formulation process at all as he did is incorrect. [/quote] I never said imminent. Treaty reshuffling was mentioned and I was saying that treaty shuffling would result in Mj moving towards the Umbrella side, imo. Treaty shuffling happens before every major war so taking ties as of right now and hypothetically constructing a war out of it is ridiculous so I took the OP question to be what blocs would move where if a war between MK and Umbrella was to happen and that thought process resulted in Mjolnir on Umbrellas side despite the NoR tie to MK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 What ever happened to Natan's post on this page? It contributed a great deal to the discussion; it's a shame that it disappeared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Feanor Noldorin Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Denial' timestamp='1326420469' post='2898449'] And we even got along well for a few weeks after it was signed! [/quote] The others didnt understand you like Bodvar and I did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monster Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 That's what I always found odd about it being Bodvar's treaty since it didn't seem to really match up with his other stances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1326424112' post='2898484'] The others didnt understand you like Bodvar and I did. [/quote] Crymson and Saber are why we couldn't have nice things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beefspari Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Methrage' timestamp='1326416334' post='2898403'] I'm guessing this thread was made to brag or point out how many allies / how large a portion of the treaty web DH is able to manipulate by pretending to be 3 separate alliances. [/quote] All part of our ongoing plan to merge into the Doomhouse AA and take over everything. [img]http://meru.xfury.net/images/aeris/aerisdisL2.jpg[/img] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='janax' timestamp='1326401285' post='2898222'] I didn't know you played for the Patriots [/quote] I know Tebow vs Brady = Brady wins. [quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1326402382' post='2898227'] I didn't know you had to play for the patriots to prove something. [/quote] I was being entirely OOC, Pats > Broncos [quote name='janax' timestamp='1326404276' post='2898248'] "I can't wait until saturday to prove this wrong" implies he will be the one doing the proving. Since Tebow plays the patriots, one can only assume he (Mogar) plays for the Pats. [/quote] I can't prefer one team over the other? I admit I pretend IC to be unbiased, but OOC I can't pick a football team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aurion Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Mogar' timestamp='1326429586' post='2898541'] I know Tebow vs Brady = Brady wins. I was being entirely OOC, Pats > Broncos I can't prefer one team over the other? I admit I pretend IC to be unbiased, but OOC I can't pick a football team? [/quote] It's like when people use "we" to refer to their favorite team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Aurion' timestamp='1326436034' post='2898628'] It's like when people use "we" to refer to their favorite team. [/quote] supporting a team tends to put you on their side, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 I'd have to agree with Mogar here. I routinely say "we suck" being a skins fan and all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafael Nadal Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 (edited) [quote name='Feanor Noldorin' timestamp='1326424112' post='2898484'] The others didnt understand you like Bodvar and I did. [/quote] I think the cancellation of our treaty is still the quickest TOP has ever done anything. I mean hell, you beat us to canceling and we had already decided to cancel. That was a pretty short conversation with Crymson. Edited January 13, 2012 by Rafael Nadal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='Unknown Smurf' timestamp='1326437854' post='2898644'] I'd have to agree with Mogar here. I routinely say "we suck" being a skins fan and all... [/quote] Regardless none of it will matter. Packers will win the superbowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 [quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1326440629' post='2898677'] Regardless none of it will matter. Packers will win the superbowl. [/quote] I got my money on the Ravens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timberland Posted January 13, 2012 Report Share Posted January 13, 2012 (edited) Umbrella and MK fights it out for a few months, GOONS declares on both and then extorts billions out of each of them. Edited January 13, 2012 by Timberland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 [quote name='Rafael Nadal' timestamp='1326398017' post='2898211'] MK WOULD WIN ON A FINAL POSSESSION DRIVE BY TIM TEBOW [/quote] You're making me consider joining Umb. Please stop this. [quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1326440629' post='2898677'] Regardless none of it will matter. Packers will win the superbowl. [/quote] xfd check this guy out. He thinks the Packers can beat a team with a top five defense. The Packers offense is massively overrated by the fact that the best defense they played is the Chiefs, who they lost to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted January 15, 2012 Report Share Posted January 15, 2012 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1326649522' post='2900103'] xfd check this guy out. He thinks the Packers can beat a team with a top five defense. The Packers offense is massively overrated by the fact that the best defense they played is the Chiefs, who they lost to. [/quote] Check this guy out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Ilyani Posted January 16, 2012 Report Share Posted January 16, 2012 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1326649522' post='2900103'] xfd check this guy out. He thinks the Packers can beat a team with a top five defense. The Packers offense is massively overrated by the fact that the best defense they played is the Chiefs, who they lost to. [/quote] Oddly perceptive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted January 16, 2012 Report Share Posted January 16, 2012 [quote name='commander thrawn' timestamp='1326667652' post='2900334'] Check this guy out. [/quote] Talk about egg on my face. It didn't even take the 49ers to beat the Packers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted January 16, 2012 Report Share Posted January 16, 2012 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1326677242' post='2900532'] Talk about egg on my face. It didn't even take the 49ers to beat the Packers. [/quote] What you said is still right though, the Giants healthy (as they were today) could be a top 5 D. They at least are a real good one. Packers shot themselves in the foot though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lamuella Posted January 16, 2012 Report Share Posted January 16, 2012 Flying Tigers would win. Flying Tigers have already won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted January 17, 2012 Report Share Posted January 17, 2012 In case anyone is wondering, I'm thinking Ravens over Pats this week, since the Pats haven't beat anyone that has winning record this season while the Ravens have a ironclad defense and offense that is underrated by the strength of the defenses it's played this year and is going to tear apart the Pats defense. Not a damn clue about the Giants-Niners game, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unknown Smurf Posted January 17, 2012 Report Share Posted January 17, 2012 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1326765001' post='2901247'] In case anyone is wondering, I'm thinking Ravens over Pats this week, since the Pats haven't beat anyone that has winning record this season while the Ravens have a ironclad defense and offense that is underrated by the strength of the defenses it's played this year and is going to tear apart the Pats defense. Not a damn clue about the Giants-Niners game, though. [/quote] I gotta agree with you on the Ravens game, I also am picking the 49ers over the Giants, depends on the line though. The Giants O can definitely put up big numbers but the 49ers D is nowhere near as !@#$%* as the Packers D and I see them pulling through. Also my man Vernons (Vernon Davis = UMD Alumni, friend of a friend) gonna have a big game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts