Groucho Marx Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Goose' timestamp='1323389643' post='2869821'] What a horrible day. I turn up for what should be a long and brutal war only to get told 'no' after CN gets me all hot and bothered... I hate you all. [/quote] Join GOONS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Miller Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 I always thought CSN was a freaking joke. However, I thought their SF membership may have meant something. Apparently I was wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander shepard Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='tarman2010' timestamp='1323389435' post='2869808'] But what about all these CMs I bought? [/quote] They aren't worth crap now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Jaym Il Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 CSN honestly should have stayed in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookavich Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Cheers, CSN. Thanks for the tech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goose Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Kim Jaym Il' timestamp='1323392196' post='2869919'] CSN honestly should have stayed in. [/quote] I agree. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Mean GÜNS this is all your fault. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wickedj Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Matt Miller' timestamp='1323391874' post='2869912'] I always thought CSN was a freaking joke. However, I thought their SF membership may have meant something. Apparently I was wrong. [/quote] This isnt that CSN, that CSN fought hard for GATO..this one would not and is not quite as noble Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vladimir Stukov II Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 CSN should be rolled on principle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GulagArchipelago Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 AT LEAST fight for a week before calling it quits..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kerschbs Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) Gino would be rolling in his graves right now. Well done CSN, well done. Edit: found out AT is still around, well damn. Edited December 9, 2011 by kerschbs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Sandwich Controversy' timestamp='1323389657' post='2869824'] Indeed, I hope the tech was worth this PR disaster, Doomhome. [/quote] By the time 80% of the world is done burning do you think this incident will be more than a foot note? Just waiting to see where Doom House redirects themselves, should be fun. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jens of the desert Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Poor show CSN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDI Crossfire Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 thread needs moar GOON reps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
commander thrawn Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 A good move by all involved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acrux Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Trinite' timestamp='1323391841' post='2869910'] Who's the one? At any rate, I don't know if I'm more confused as to why TTK and CRAP got hit, or why CSN isn't still getting hit, but congrats on peace I guess. [/quote] #104 of #105... one that pulls down our avg. no worries im sure we'll aid him 1b to fix that from happening again. also wheres my tech from sparta? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 So, this leaves DH (and Alchemy, but minus Umb given NS ranges) at war with only NPL, of the apparently "strategically important" alliances selected to be "preempted"? I would have thought an alliance like MHA would have been given a higher priority. Regardless, good to see the reasonable approach taken by the DH leadership, at least, with respect to correcting its mistake. I guess this is the flaw in "preempting" alliances when you have no evidence of their actual intentions (as opposed to Fark's preempt on NPO due to its DoS, which seems fair enough). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Xiphosis' timestamp='1323388579' post='2869755'] Thank you for recognizing a mistake and then half-assedly correcting that mistake. Brave new world indeed. [/quote] The irony of this is... if only... certain other people, would have realized these things... some time ago... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 I'm impressed MJ, DH should be in really need of you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proest Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1323393827' post='2869948'] So, this leaves DH (and Alchemy, but minus Umb given NS ranges) at war with only NPL, of the apparently "strategically important" alliances selected to be "preempted"? I would have thought an alliance like MHA would have been given a higher priority. Regardless, good to see the reasonable approach taken by the DH leadership, at least, with respect to correcting its mistake. I guess this is the flaw in "preempting" alliances when you have no evidence of their actual intentions (as opposed to Fark's preempt on NPO due to its DoS, which seems fair enough). [/quote] In case you have failed to realize: Umbrella is allied to our alliance. If Doomhouse did decide to do so, they'd be doing it without Umbrella. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arcturus Jefferson Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Proest' timestamp='1323394062' post='2869955'] In case you have failed to realize: Umbrella is allied to our alliance. If Doomhouse did decide to do so, they'd be doing it without Umbrella. [/quote] More importantly, you aren't being being preempted because you don't plan on interfering on a major front, and the cost for preempting you on a minor front is too high. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sardonic Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Sir Humphrey' timestamp='1323393827' post='2869948'] So, this leaves DH (and Alchemy, but minus Umb given NS ranges) at war with only NPL, of the apparently "strategically important" alliances selected to be "preempted"? I would have thought an alliance like MHA would have been given a higher priority. Regardless, good to see the reasonable approach taken by the DH leadership, at least, with respect to correcting its mistake. I guess this is the flaw in "preempting" alliances when you have no evidence of their actual intentions (as opposed to Fark's preempt on NPO due to its DoS, which seems fair enough). [/quote] NPL aren't strategically important, we just have a beef to settle with them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raken Posted December 9, 2011 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 [quote name='Arcturus Jefferson' timestamp='1323394172' post='2869957'] More importantly, you aren't being being preempted because you don't plan on interfering on a major front, and the cost for preempting you on a minor front is too high. [/quote] No, DH wouldn't hit MHA. It is that simple. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Humphrey Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Proest' timestamp='1323394062' post='2869955'] In case you have failed to realize: Umbrella is allied to our alliance. If Doomhouse did decide to do so, they'd be doing it without Umbrella. [/quote] Attacking allies of coalition partners has not seemed a problem so far in this war. But point taken with respect to MHA/Umb. Edited December 9, 2011 by Sir Humphrey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Williambonney Posted December 9, 2011 Report Share Posted December 9, 2011 Good to see this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.