Jump to content

AnCapistan

Members
  • Posts

    4,768
  • Joined

Blog Comments posted by AnCapistan

  1. So here's the problem with the idea that I have been magically humbled: Schattenmann--the leader of an alliance with 2 optional military treaties--creates a channel to discuss the possibility of going to war, and 16 alliances show up for the party. Oh, yeah, I am sooooooo mortified and humbled.

    To be fair, when the alliances that show up are UPN, DF, Invicta and NSO that's not really a good thing.

  2. I always understood that PZI was only for one nation. If you delete and reroll you're okay. If you're not okay then it was EZI.

    That said, the EoG list could be construed as PZI. However, the major difference between it and PZI is that there is a path out (an easy one too) of EoG for the guilty.

    And moralists way to make yourself look like fools again. GOONS: Destroying 20,000 nations since 2009!

  3. Actually, most alliances casually ignore the intel clauses in the treaties they sign anyway, and many alliances ignore non-aggression clauses as well. The only clauses the peanut gallery cares about are binding defense clauses, you won't even find much in the way of interest for the violation of binding aggression clauses.

    I care about both as me or my allies have been wronged by both. :|

  4. You're right. Jesus said turn the other cheek, which was good advice until, you know, they crucified him.

    Either way, I don't believe it MUST be built. I believe that if it is what the land owner wants, so be it. Your property is your property. As an aside, wasn't there a mosque there before 9/11?

    Yes.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38760800/ns/politics-more_politics/

    I agree with others, it doesn't HAVE to be built. However, if the owner wishes to build a mosque/community center/whatever there he's perfectly within his right to do so. Provided he (it is a he right?) doesn't violate any zoning laws.

×
×
  • Create New...