Jump to content

NATO DoNA


dev0win

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 122
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

[quote name='pezstar' timestamp='1292996796' post='2549400']
I see nothing wrong with the use of non-chaining clauses to refrain from entry into a war you think is pathetic and stupid. It's one thing to say no when your allies are getting beaten down for a reasonable reason. In this case? Well. NEW deserves it, and the side beating on them doesn't look like they're going to need much help. I think that this was a good move for NATO.
[/quote]

Its good to see others around here that can see beyond the "WARZ NOW!" mentality. Smart move by NATO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='pezstar' timestamp='1292996796' post='2549400']
I see nothing wrong with the use of non-chaining clauses to refrain from entry into a war you think is pathetic and stupid. It's one thing to say no when your allies are getting beaten down for a reasonable reason. In this case? Well. NEW deserves it, and the side beating on them doesn't look like they're going to need much help. I think that this was a good move for NATO.
[/quote]
Thanks pezstar.

I kinda miss Purqua now. Maybe we dropped the wrong alliance.

Good luck NATO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Batallion' timestamp='1292996921' post='2549414']
There's no need to hammer NATO in this thread everyone, just know that TFD will most certainly be in this conflict and will most certainly be attacked, so one way or another NATO will get dragged in. With that said, I'm outta here. :smug:
[/quote]


Yes, this person is absolutely correct, he should be awarded. :rolleyes:




Anyways, yeah, keep living in your fantasy world, boy.



Confusion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Gairyuki' timestamp='1292996802' post='2549401']
Just call yourselves the neutral atlantic treaty organization and be done with it. -_-
[/quote]

In that light PC = Peace Corp and iFOK = international Friendly Optimist Klan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jacapo Saladin' timestamp='1292997137' post='2549429']
Oh hey good to see TFD is more important than all of your other MDPs, including [b]Bloc[/b].
[/quote]

It's not the importance of the treaty (though it is important), but rather it's our only chaining treaty.

Edited by AtheistRepublican
Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='pezstar' timestamp='1292996796' post='2549400']
I see nothing wrong with the use of non-chaining clauses to refrain from entry into a war you think is pathetic and stupid. It's one thing to say no when your allies are getting beaten down for a reasonable reason. In this case? Well. NEW deserves it, and the side beating on them doesn't look like they're going to need much help. I think that this was a good move for NATO.
[/quote]

This. ^ And you've got it exactly right. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[quote name='Jacapo Saladin' timestamp='1292997137' post='2549429']
Oh hey good to see TFD is more important than all of your other MDPs, including [b]Bloc[/b].
[/quote]

It's both TFD and NATO's only chaining treaty.

NATO, I know this decision was tough to do. o/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...