Ivan Moldavi Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Congratulations to both alliances. I was hoping for three but two is still very nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorldConqueror Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 [quote name='Bob Ilyani' date='21 May 2010 - 10:13 AM' timestamp='1274397172' post='2305930'] [font=Arial, Verdana, Tahoma, sans-serif]So we can take them down together? Alright. You guys have fun.[/font] [/quote] You are welcome to try, though the last thing I remember Nemesis bringing down was the average IQ of this world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shahenshah Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Congratulations o\ A good day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jazzy95 Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 It kinda wanna makes me wanna get into a cheerleader uniform and start cheering, but I hold it all in until there is a bloc between NSO, NPO and NpO o/ Everyone in the treaty? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfg4ng Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Lookin' good Pacifia. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 [quote name='Joshuajames' date='21 May 2010 - 06:42 PM' timestamp='1274481729' post='2307348'] Lookin' good Pacifia. [/quote] So is your flowing golden hair Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jake Liebenow Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 Excellent treaty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpoiL Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 I hear the sound of trembling.. [img]http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/100276794_548c83c4eb.jpg[/img] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sequoia Throne Posted May 22, 2010 Report Share Posted May 22, 2010 For many months under terms I looked forward to seeing this treaty, not sure if it would ever come to pass. I'm very pleased that it did, I'm happy to call the Sith our friends and allies. HAIL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heft Posted May 23, 2010 Report Share Posted May 23, 2010 Hurray for us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sognatore Posted May 23, 2010 Report Share Posted May 23, 2010 Late reply, but gratz to two great alliances o/NPO o/NSO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 Now here is a NSO announcement I can get 100% behind, congrats guys, two awesome groups, you guys should have a epic future in store! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cager Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 I think you should include a clause in there that should state that should an announcement be posted that states that this treaty will never be canceled, the alliance in question should be obliged to keep their word and not cancel the treaty anyway. So we don't have a repeat of the Ordinance of Orders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfg4ng Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='Cager' date='23 May 2010 - 11:12 PM' timestamp='1274670724' post='2309834'] I think you should include a clause in there that should state that should an announcement be posted that states that this treaty will never be canceled, the alliance in question should be obliged to keep their word and not cancel the treaty anyway. So we don't have a repeat of the Ordinance of Orders. [/quote] OH. Thanks for comparing us to a relationship that dominated [ooc] this game [ooc] for quite sometime though, im glad people see that much potential in us. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='Cager' date='23 May 2010 - 11:12 PM' timestamp='1274670724' post='2309834'] I think you should include a clause in there that should state that should an announcement be posted that states that this treaty will never be canceled, the alliance in question should be obliged to keep their word and not cancel the treaty anyway. So we don't have a repeat of the Ordinance of Orders. [/quote] You have to try harder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Cager' date='23 May 2010 - 11:12 PM' timestamp='1274670724' post='2309834'] I think you should include a clause in there that should state that should an announcement be posted that states that this treaty will never be canceled, the alliance in question should be obliged to keep their word and not cancel the treaty anyway. So we don't have a repeat of the Ordinance of Orders. [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]Thank you for showing your ignorance in regards to the relationship between the Orders. Polar and Pacifica had to part because they had different friends, each who happened to be the enemy of the other. It was an inevitability that took years to happen. I will not claim to predict the future, but the relationship between the Sith and Pacifcans is a result of the fact that we share a similar goal. Plus, last time I checked this treaty did have a cancellation clause. Nice try though, although you're obviously not up to par with your buddies in MK. To be fair, I am not quite sure if that last statement is a compliment or an insult, so take it as you will.[/color] Edited May 25, 2010 by Rebel Virginia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' date='24 May 2010 - 11:41 PM' timestamp='1274737296' post='2310509'] [color="#0000FF"]Thank you for showing your ignorance in regards to the relationship between the Orders. Polar and Pacifica had to part because they had different friends, each who happened to be the enemy of the other. It was an inevitability that took years to happen. I will not claim to predict the future, but the relationship between the Sith and Pacifcans is a result of the fact that we share a similar goal. Plus, last time I checked this treaty did have a cancellation clause. Nice try though, although you're obviously not up to par with your buddies in MK. To be fair, I am not quite sure if that last statement is a complement or an insult, so take it as you will.[/color] [/quote] ...but that doesn't [i]quite[/i] make sense, RV....and I think you know that. Regardless of having 'different friends who are enemies', if you have a treaty that has been deemed unbreakable, it takes precedence over 'friendships'. Also, I don't see why you have to answer him in that tone without provocation. The leader of Facepunch recently did the same to you, and a herd of NSO came out of the wordworks to defend you...not as if you need it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='nippy' date='24 May 2010 - 06:17 PM' timestamp='1274739461' post='2310552'] ...but that doesn't [i]quite[/i] make sense, RV....and I think you know that. Regardless of having 'different friends who are enemies', if you have a treaty that has been deemed unbreakable, it takes precedence over 'friendships'. Also, I don't see why you have to answer him in that tone without provocation. The leader of Facepunch recently did the same to you, and a herd of NSO came out of the wordworks to defend you...not as if you need it. [/quote] You had to try pretty hard to work the FacePunch incident into this conversation, but you managed, didn't you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='Corinan' date='25 May 2010 - 12:58 AM' timestamp='1274741864' post='2310596'] You had to try pretty hard to work the FacePunch incident into this conversation, but you managed, didn't you? [/quote] Miraculously, I don't clear my brain every time I post in a new thread. What I've seen and done in the past carries on, somehow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrenster Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 The post in question could be seen as a snide remark about parallel history between the Orders. A shrewd man would use such a statement to poke up some dissension between Pacifica and us. Of course, that's just stupid. I don't know what his intentions were in making such a remark, but I can tell you that RV probably saw some hostility in it. And I don't know why you had to bring up the FB comment. That has absolutely nothing to do with this topic and possibly one of the worst analogies that you can make for how RV responded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KainIIIC Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='nippy' date='24 May 2010 - 05:17 PM' timestamp='1274739461' post='2310552'] ...but that doesn't [i]quite[/i] make sense, RV....and I think you know that. Regardless of having 'different friends who are enemies', if you have a treaty that has been deemed unbreakable, it takes precedence over 'friendships'. Also, I don't see why you have to answer him in that tone without provocation. The leader of Facepunch recently did the same to you, and a herd of NSO came out of the wordworks to defend you...not as if you need it. [/quote] I do hope you realize that we all were laughing and amused about the MoD going bat !@#$ on RV in addition to the lame attempts of defense you guys used against us. That's really all there is to it. The unbreakable treaties that NPO held with Polar and MHA show how stupid unbreakable treaties are, not to mention the current fiasco with the 'unbreakable treaty' between MHA and GRE. We're both not going to continue that silly habit dated from '06 and '07, even if it has some kind of romantic appeal to some today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nippy Posted May 24, 2010 Report Share Posted May 24, 2010 [quote name='Jrenster' date='25 May 2010 - 01:14 AM' timestamp='1274742869' post='2310614'] And I don't know why you had to bring up the FB comment. That has absolutely nothing to do with this topic and possibly one of the worst analogies that you can make for how RV responded. [/quote] Worst analogies? It fit perfectly. Someone made a benign inquiry that was answered with an undue amount of hostility. I brought up a perfect example of that happening TO RV. Not sure why you're so opposed to that, but whatever. [quote name='KainIIIC' date='25 May 2010 - 01:30 AM' timestamp='1274743810' post='2310624'] I do hope you realize that we all were laughing and amused about the MoD going bat !@#$ on RV in addition to the lame attempts of defense you guys used against us. That's really all there is to it. [/quote] You were 'laughing and amused' despite your cries of horror upon viewing his unexpected retort? Nice performance. I'll be sure to look out for the 'NSO drama bomb' in future posts of yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Dresden Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 (edited) [quote name='nippy' date='24 May 2010 - 05:17 PM' timestamp='1274739461' post='2310552'] ...but that doesn't [i]quite[/i] make sense, RV....and I think you know that. Regardless of having 'different friends who are enemies', if you have a treaty that has been deemed unbreakable, it takes precedence over 'friendships'. Also, I don't see why you have to answer him in that tone without provocation. The leader of Facepunch recently did the same to you, and a herd of NSO came out of the wordworks to defend you...not as if you need it. [/quote] Let's not go there. This thread is not about RV or Facepunch. Edit: Too Late, Warned. Edited May 25, 2010 by Harry Dresden Too late Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heggo Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 (edited) I'll stipulate that non-cancellation clauses are not only silly in general, but also unneeded in this specific case. The Sith-Pacifican relationship is plenty strong, thank-you-very-much. Edited May 25, 2010 by heggo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stangad Posted May 25, 2010 Report Share Posted May 25, 2010 (edited) I am happy to see this. Edited May 25, 2010 by stangad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.