Jump to content

Wad of Lint

  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Wad of Lint

  • Rank
    Sith Imperator Emeritus

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
  • ICQ

Profile Information

  • Gender

Previous Fields

  • Nation Name
    Back Pocket
  • Alliance Name
    New Sith Order
  • Resource 1
  • Resource 2
  1. [quote name='kerschbs' timestamp='1277599702' post='2351417'] Decollo and Mongo. They were fun. [/quote] I have to agree on this.
  2. [quote name='Epiphanus' date='14 July 2010 - 01:36 AM' timestamp='1279085770' post='2370546'] Hold on, let me get bitter about things that happened a year ago. NSO is and always will be a sub par alliance. While this joke probably should have included Valhalla on the knowing it's a joke end, it's not the end all drama llama you lot are trying to make it out to be. [/quote] Oh come now. We've obviously made it into your vocabulary whereas I have no clue who you are.
  3. [quote name='Gamemaster1' date='11 July 2010 - 06:59 PM' timestamp='1278889130' post='2367335'] When you are bound by text, you honor that text. [/quote] You may honor text, but you are never bound solely to text. You may have signed a document agreeing to defend a treaty partner, but I doubt you have ever signed something vowing not to defend those who you are not tied to.
  4. You rely far too much on text to dictate what you can and cannot do.
  5. The Sith ideology is spreading. I am always glad to see homage paid to our revolutionary ideas.
  6. [quote name='Seth Muscarella' date='15 June 2010 - 08:43 PM' timestamp='1276648970' post='2338873'] I didn't see unwelcoming alliances as much as I saw reaction to BCOM being disrespectful about the way NOIR handled its affairs. In the end, the final vote showed the same as many, many alliances that have come through NOIR before:[b] BCOM was not established enough as an alliance to be admitted to NOIR.[/b] There have been very few exceptions to that rule over time, and more often than not those alliances we let in early have disbanded. NOIR is not a beginning alliance protection bloc; we are
  7. [quote name='Ryuzaki' date='11 June 2010 - 01:10 AM' timestamp='1276233012' post='2332901'] No matter who is helping them it doesn't increase the number of nations for trade circles. [/quote] Lack of support from fellow team neighbors can make even the largest sphere look empty.
  8. [quote name='Penkala' date='11 June 2010 - 10:31 AM' timestamp='1276266697' post='2333238'] P. sure my fellow alliance mates and I took your members out behind the shed and beat the living daylights out of them, but that's not what this topic is about. This topic is about the absolute hilarity that is purple, and the hope that they may destroy each other. [/quote] I will not deny the beating we received, but it did not come from CSN. You would do well to remember to credit your masters for your "victory". But your right. We should be discussing this fair fight that has been presented. I
  9. [quote name='Penkala' date='11 June 2010 - 10:22 AM' timestamp='1276266125' post='2333232'] Oh don't worry. CSN hasn't taken you seriously since we abused and beat your alliance like a red-headed stepchild and left your leader sobbing in the corner writing his resignation letter. [/quote] Claiming YOU "abused and beat" my alliance is quite a stretch. We both know you're FARK's young cousin.
  10. [quote name='Zoomzoomzoom' date='10 June 2010 - 11:17 PM' timestamp='1276226232' post='2332715'] You made a really bad call on this. Small AAs have difficulty growing to begin with. How do you think being on a sphere with little trades is going to help? [/quote] Considering we offer help and support where others would not, it should be just fine.
  11. I am very happy to welcome another alliance to the Brown sphere.
  12. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='10 June 2010 - 09:38 PM' timestamp='1276220280' post='2332524'] Rather, our manliness refused to be contained by such wimpy conditions. The Commonwealth fights with everything it has or it does not fight at all. [/quote] Excuse me while I no longer take you seriously.
  13. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='10 June 2010 - 09:25 PM' timestamp='1276219525' post='2332508'] I was referring to the fact that NSO's duel challenges were always full of [b]wimpy conditions[/b] and clauses (no nukes, no navy, etc), which is quite different from BAPS' challenge here. [/quote] So that would make those who declined/backed out... Ah. Right. Wimpy.
  14. [quote name='Lord Brendan' date='10 June 2010 - 09:19 PM' timestamp='1276219158' post='2332498'] The duel challenges NSO have issued in the past are rather [i]un[/i]like the one being put forth by BAPS here. I echo your hope though; I would like to see this fight happen. [/quote] You're absolutely right. This one hasn't been weaseled out of yet.
  • Create New...