Acca Dacca Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Trust me, these are not "gangsters" and they are not "hood"You can lay those fears to rest. Did they have to check with you first or something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 So you're another alliance Hell bent on playing by the current norms and taking no risks, yet at the same time claiming to be thugs and hard? Yeah, sounds like the original \m/ to me. Good job. Quoted for the crushing irony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starbuck Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Did they have to check with you first or something? No, they didn't even need to apply he just rejected them strait out. Now to fill out my application to see if I am gangster enough for AUT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 (edited) True. Clearing a ZI list is not the same thing as ending an alliance war; however, IRON's terms do include clearing all wars.This is not actually the case. Check the surrender terms. Also, the New Polar Order, Greenland Republic and TAB were not Hegemony. For convenience, I have listed them here. IRON: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=58579 - clears all wars per Article 8 GGA: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=57473 - does not clear wars UPN: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=56109 - does not clear wars Veritas Aequitas: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=55970 - does not clear wars The Legion: http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=56117 - does not clear wars I would suggest some efforts be made to contact these alliances, along with the Karma alliances listed above, by whatever diplomatic staff \m/ has chosen to employ. You don't need to declare war on the same alliance twice. GGA and VA wee also contacted some time ago for a different reformation possibility. Polar was contacted as well. If UPN wants to fight them, well.. lol. Pretty much. RAD was originally going to pull this move, but for various reasons did not.One pathetic alliance changes their name to another pathetic alliance in hopes of banking off their former glory and reputation, even though when push came to shove and the original \m/ had to show what they were made of, they caved like the pathetic excuse for an alliance they were. There are plenty of fine arguments against this and other \m/ reformations. Well, I mean some, but people just mostly like going "haha we kill you (plz forget when world killed us) >". I don't know about this reformation, but the talks of the last one weren't for 'recruiting' purposes and fell through because R's appeal was denied and it was felt that it wouldn't be 'legitimate' without him. Edited December 25, 2009 by Penkala Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 (edited) Did they have to check with you first or something? This is the image that popped into my head. Also, war flag. You're welcome. No, they didn't even need to apply he just rejected them strait out. Now to fill out my application to see if I am gangster enough for AUT. You've certainly the grammar for it. Edit: The only think I'll say about this is if these group of friends want to reform, let them. Why not? Just live and let live. And if they act up? Then just jack them up it's not hard. Edited December 25, 2009 by The AUT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starbuck Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 This is the image that popped into my head. Also, war flag. You're welcome. You've certainly the grammar for it. Edit: The only think I'll say about this is if these group of friends want to reform, let them. Why not? Just live and let live. And if they act up? Then just jack them up it's not hard. Great one catiagory down, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikMark Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 So you're another alliance Hell bent on playing by the current norms and taking no risks, yet at the same time claiming to be thugs and hard? Yeah, sounds like the original \m/ to me. Good job. You, sir, just made my day. Oh, the irony! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 This is the image that popped into my head. Also, war flag. You're welcome. You've certainly the grammar for it. Edit: The only think I'll say about this is if these group of friends want to reform, let them. Why not? Just live and let live. And if they act up? Then just jack them up it's not hard. It actually is kind of hard now seeing as RoK backs them and about half the world backs RoK. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 (edited) Great one catiagory down, Like I said... It actually is kind of hard now seeing as RoK backs them and about half the world backs RoK. And the other half? Edited December 25, 2009 by The AUT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Like I said...And the other half? Actually all major alliances except neutrals are indirectly tied to Ragnarok. But if there were another half I suppose it'd be up to them to do something about this then, wouldn't it? Seriously, there's absolutely no excuse to be hating a name so much. You're all just proving that even in death they got under your skin. Thy don't care what you say, and will feed off of your hatred of them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The AUT Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Actually all major alliances except neutrals are indirectly tied to Ragnarok. But if there were another half I suppose it'd be up to them to do something about this then, wouldn't it? Seriously, there's absolutely no excuse to be hating a name so much. You're all just proving that even in death they got under your skin. Thy don't care what you say, and will feed off of your hatred of them. Hold on, I did say if they were friends and love the community so much they should reform and people should lay off of them. As for saying Ragnaroks treatied to the MDP web, well, remember so was NPO and look what happened. When things start fracturing you'll get one side and another side, and you've no idea who's going to be where. That's just the nature of the game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Hold on, I did say if they were friends and love the community so much they should reform and people should lay off of them. As for saying Ragnaroks treatied to the MDP web, well, remember so was NPO and look what happened. When things start fracturing you'll get one side and another side, and you've no idea who's going to be where. That's just the nature of the game. \m/'s safe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 \m/'s safe. Didn't they say that about a number of other alliances before they got attacked? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Penkala Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Didn't they say that about a number of other alliances before they got attacked? OK. You got me. They're in imminent danger. What're you trying to prove? They're protected by a big alliance with good ties, now, so they're not going to be rolled. That's my point. Do you have one, or are you arguing for the sake of arguing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jtkode Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 LIES THIS IS JUST ANOTHER APRIL FOOLS!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lebubu Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 ~nevar forget~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voodoo Nova Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 OK. You got me. They're in imminent danger. What're you trying to prove? They're protected by a big alliance with good ties, now, so they're not going to be rolled. That's my point. Do you have one, or are you arguing for the sake of arguing? No one is in "imminent danger", however, ties to large alliances do not dictate whether or not someone is going to be attacked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardoon Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 . . . cash in on it's former glory in an effort to garner them a quick boost to reputation or members or both. "Former Glory" "Reputation" They failed, they were pathetic, they were sad, their leaders were horrible and worthless. "failed" "Pathetic" "horrible" "Worthless" Maybe you should go get some sleep AJ. You're conflicting your own posts. \m/>.<\m/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Machiabelly Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 The opposite of love isn't hate, it is indifference. So my response is, and feel free to quote me, "Meh" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigerdonia Redux Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Congratulations to the newly zombified. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Keshav IV Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 \m/ is dead. Go away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LOLtex Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Best of luck \m/. Haters gon hate, and all that jazz. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jgoods45 Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 (edited) What a cute thread. Good luck with this guys. =) Also, Londo, I see you there. Get the hell on IRC. Edited December 25, 2009 by Jgoods45 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Christmas miracle? No. Also, didn't click on the music link, as my 9 year-old was in the room. Very classy guys.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coach Posted December 25, 2009 Report Share Posted December 25, 2009 Nice vid link, I don't know what it has to do with anything, but....welcome to "The Black Team" I guess. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.