AirMe Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Also, WTH, you think that MADP offer was serious? I know you guys get sarcasm.........but seriously......man..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daikos Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 so you call out NSO for threatening CSN and say they are all talk and no walk, then go and do it yourself? umm.... i honestly don't know what to say about that.... ITT: We remind people for an infinite amount of times that we don't war for OOC reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 That is a fine looking llama you have there. Why, thank you, sir. It was a gift from my old friend Electron Sponge - he left it in my bar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkerNinja Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Just because it was an OOC attack, does not mean it is not an IC issue. We believe it is, and we wanted to make the NSO aware of it in the proper manner. I don't know what is so hard to understand here.In addition, those people complaining about the quote "Furthermore I think NSO should be destroyed", are clearly missing the historical reference. But if you concede that an OOC attack is simultaneously an IC issue, why the prohibition about utilizing this IC issue to justify an IC attack? Just doesn't make sense to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 ITT: We remind people for an infinite amount of times that we don't war for OOC reasons. But SCM just said it had IC ramifications....not two posts ago? lmao. I'll go get a shovel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AirMe Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 ITT: We remind people for an infinite amount of times that we don't war for OOC reasons. Then don't post a "HEY!!!! LOOK AT ME GIVE ME ATTENTION!!!!" thread about it. As you guys were telling NSO, put up or shut up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Just because it was an OOC attack, does not mean it is not an IC issue. We believe it is, and we wanted to make the NSO aware of it in the proper manner. I don't know what is so hard to understand here.In addition, those people complaining about the quote "Furthermore I think NSO should be destroyed", are clearly missing the historical reference. Then why no DoW if you think it's IC? Come now don't be fragile. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deadshot Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Anyone thinking NSO is seriously asking for an MDAP is off their rocker. No proof=drama llama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomInterrupt Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Why, thank you, sir. It was a gift from my old friend Electron Sponge - he left it in my bar. I certainly hope the llama did not spit in any of your patrons drinks. They can get quite a range you know. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dochartaigh Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 ITT: We remind people for an infinite amount of times that we don't war for OOC reasons. ok. what does that have to do with what i said? you thumped your chest stating that ya'll think NSO should be destroyed but are too chicken-livered yellow bellies to actually do it. nice. i would have to say that is worse than NSO threatening war against CSN. since they said it was a possibility. i would honestly think NSO would go to war if they found it necessary. you on the other hand obviously don't have the cajones to go to war against NSO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tygaland Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 (edited) ITT: We remind people for an infinite amount of times that we don't war for OOC reasons. No, you just throw unsubstantiated claims of [ooc]"OOC attacks"[/ooc] in the hope someone else will attack them for you. If this was not the plan them I'm not sure why this discussion was opened. Whoever did invite porn/gore attacks on your forum is an idiot but I'd be wary of levelling allegations towards a group of people or, in this case, an individual without solid evidence behind your allegation. There is as much evidence to support your allegation as there is the allegation one of your own members made the request to frame the NSO. Edited December 22, 2009 by Tygaland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltus Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 (edited) So, you don't like them. And you say it out in public. But you're not going to do anything. Great. Way to let people know how strong you are. Edited December 22, 2009 by Baltus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magicninja Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Their "It's OOC!" defense went out the window the moment SCM said it was an IC issue. Now the ball is still in their court. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 I certainly hope the llama did not spit in any of your patrons drinks. They can get quite a range you know. It took me a while to train it. Now it spits in patrons' drinks only on demand. If they displease me, for example, but I don't intend to make war or other serious action because of it, I simply deploy my drama llama. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 I put my money on Ivan mopping up DT while on a coffee break, reading a newspaper and smoking a marlboro. What is it these days with call out threads that lack the actual call out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eden Taylor Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 I don't like NSO either, but the evidence here isn't very convincing. Either know someone did something they shouldn't and stand up for yourself, or not be sure that someone did something and shut up; anything in the middle is kind of lame. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 Then why no DoW if you think it's IC?Come now don't be fragile. Because not every IC issue demands a declaration of war? Especially if the IC issue has spun up from an OOC issue? you thumped your chest stating that ya'll think NSO should be destroyed In addition, those people complaining about the quote "Furthermore I think NSO should be destroyed", are clearly missing the historical reference. No, you just throw unsubstantiated claims of [ooc]"OOC attacks"[/ooc] in the hope someone else will attack them for you. Incorrect, we do not desire any war to come up from this issue. We simply wanted to inform NSO and the world about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fallen Fool Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 It took me a while to train it. Now it spits in patrons' drinks only on demand. If they displease me, for example, but I don't intend to make war or other serious action because of it, I simply deploy my drama llama.Is there any specific criteria for its deployment or use? Or do you handle that sort of thing on more of an ad hoc basis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senekis Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 (edited) Incorrect, we do not desire any war to come up from this issue. We simply wanted to inform NSO and the world about it. You wanted to inform the world that you dislike the NSO and that you're accusing us without having evidence? Old story, you should've not wasted your time making a new thread. Edit: typo Edited December 22, 2009 by Senekis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 I usually jump at the opportunity to make Starcraftboy look like the moralist nitwit that he is, however, tonight it seems more than enough people are on him tonight. I'm a kind fellow, ain't I? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master-Debater Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 You consider it an OOC matter then go and make a IC fuss but say that its OOC and won’t do anything IC because its OOC but you complain to the world that something happened to you and you can’t prove who did it and even if you could, you wouldn’t do anything. From anyone else that wouldn’t make sense and be totally expected…….but its you so its par for the course. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 (edited) You wanted to inform the world that you dislike the NSO and that you're accusing us without having evidence? Old story, you should've not wasted your time making a new thread. Edit: typo I wanted to inform the NSO so that they could perhaps approach the member of theirs whom we believe perpetrated the act, and question him over it. Or carry out whatever investigation of their own. Or ignore us - we really don't care. But I think when someone perpetrates the act outlined in the OP*, the suspect's alliance should be notified. For instance, if it was someone in my alliance, I would want to find out who, and expel them if I believed strongly enough that they were responsible. And I would most certainly find out, if it was a member of mine. Edited December 22, 2009 by Starcraftmazter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laserwolf Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 (edited) Is there any specific criteria for its deployment or use? Or do you handle that sort of thing on more of an ad hoc basis? I've generally seen it in action on an as-needed basis. Then again my timing can be off sometimes. EDIT: I wanted to inform the NSO so that they could perhaps approach the member of theirs whom we believe perpetrated the act, and question him over it. Or carry out whatever investigation of their own. Or ignore us - we really don't care.But I think when someone perpetrates the act outlined in the OP*, the suspect's alliance should be notified. For instance, if it was someone in my alliance, I would want to find out who, and expel them if I believed strongly enough that they were responsible. And I would most certainly find out, if it was a member of mine. This is all well and good but private channels would have been better received. Just sayin. Edited December 22, 2009 by Laserwolf Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrie Melodies Posted December 22, 2009 Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 I usually jump at the opportunity to make Starcraftboy look like the moralist nitwit that he is, however, tonight it seems more than enough people are on him tonight. I'm a kind fellow, ain't I? The world and your personality cult demand that you give this issue the time and effort it is clear due! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted December 22, 2009 Author Report Share Posted December 22, 2009 You consider it an OOC matter then go and make a IC fuss but say that its OOC and won’t do anything IC because its OOC but you complain to the world that something happened to you and you can’t prove who did it and even if you could, you wouldn’t do anything.From anyone else that wouldn’t make sense and be totally expected…….but its you so its par for the course. It makes no sense because you have it wrong. An issue could be both IC and OOC, as I believe this is. We do not declare war for such things, or most other things - but only for very very good reasons. We are not here to complain, I don't know how you got that impression. As I said, the announcement was made to inform NSO about the issue, and because it was quite funny and ironic of an event to occur. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.