Eden Taylor

[quote name='Stalk' timestamp='1285389791' post='2463941'] {76} [color=black](+0)[/color] [color=black][i]Umbrella[/i][/color] : 22.75 --> 22.75 [color=black](+0.00)[/color] [/quote] Ouch.

:lameparrot: and all that jazz.

What a tease.

[quote name='Davian Thule' timestamp='1284699821' post='2456394'] Oh hey, Umbrella. [/quote] Hello yourself.

Woah. The Aids Race isn't even a close one apparently.

I like it except I think "because I want to" is a justified reason to go to war and tech raid.

Tier 1 Barrier, nom nom nom.

[quote name='im317' timestamp='1283209883' post='2436235'] 1 more thing to make doing it take longer i guess. [/quote] That's very true. Though sometimes I wonder if there couldn't be an automated way of doing update.

I've always wondered why the Survivor doesn't include member count for reference.

[quote name='Lord Fingolfin' timestamp='1283208416' post='2436207'] Fair enough, to each his own. [/quote] That precisely my opinion actually. At the same time though I can understand and settle for this: [quote name='Bob Janova' timestamp='1283207908' post='2436193'] A tech raider who screws a stagger should have to pay reps for any extra damage done. Taking the first two slots seems fine though if they coordinate and attack properly. [/quote]

[quote name='Lord Fingolfin' timestamp='1283205605' post='2436150'] I think you missed the point, it's pretty standard procedure, as I'm sure you are well aware, for two nations to declare on a rogue as soon as possible and to leave the third defensive slot open for a stagger at the discretion of the defending alliance. If a raider decides to attack on the same day that nation #1 and nation #2 do, the rogue can just not accept the raiders peace offer, and right after update on day seven jump into peace mode, completely screwing over the defending alliance. [/quote] And I think perhaps you missed my point, as well. I find roguery completely legitimate, though it is of course roguery.

If their slots aren't full, then whatever role they have as a rogue they are not being fully punished for; that's the fault of whoever wants to do the punishing. This goes for both 'rogues' and 'criminals'.

[quote name='Delta1212' timestamp='1283085271' post='2434645'] What's fun about these is that there are people who always wind up telling us who the politically dominant alliance/person in SF is, but they can't agree on which it actually is. [/quote] Well most people probably just go: CnG, SF, NPO, etc. for any blocs they think are legit; plus maybe one other if they feel like it.

1. MK 2. NPO 3. TOP 4. GOD 5. NSO I went with Global Relevance Ratings instead kind of.

Well, that was a cool couple days. Too bad it's back to business as usual.

The only thing more magnificent than that treaty is the flag. I am positively in love with it.

It was an honor to work with you and PS those two rounds oh so long ago, Jack. I was so happy to see you guys take home another flag, and I can't think of a more fitting reward for your hard work in leadership than a well-deserved retirement. Best of luck, Jack; just don't retire completely!

[quote name='Chickenzilla' timestamp='1282328031' post='2424711'] Umbrella, you suck. [/quote] I humbly disagree, sir.

More like eats our dust!

Congrats guys! Looking just as sexy as ever.

[quote name='CodyHaner' timestamp='1282173218' post='2422163'] Except for the fact green has always been the sphere of win and black is fail, yes. [/quote] Wow, even your burns are better.

Keep up the great work guys!

Is Green the new Black?!

It's sad how quickly this became so sad.

[quote name='Tygaland' timestamp='1282021622' post='2418871'] How exactly would STA start a war over this. We have announced our protectorate policy and if someone attacks what we now protect in breach of that policy then it will be they who started any conflict. Or do you now claim holding a protectorate policy to be an act of war? [/quote] This is as much a protectorate as \m/'s was; and just as pointless from what I can tell.