kulomascovia Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Yes, because "hey stop" is how all wars in the Cyberverse end after a nation is attacked, right? In this case, that would have ended the war. You know, something like "we're not joking around" would have been sufficient. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Maximus Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Of course, we in the NSO recognize the need for war in this instance but also temper that need, as usual, with some level of restraint. Therefore, as we have done in the past, this will be a single round conflict without the use of nuclear arms, followed by white peace. If RAD decides to escalate this further we will obliged them. Restraint is not historically the way of the Sith. What madness is this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essenia Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 RAD's treaties...- PWN/PWNAGE (Pink Military/Economic BLOC) - MDoAP - Ragnarok - MDoAP - Poison Clan - MDP - The Centurion Brotherhood This might get interesting. I wouldn't get your hopes up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HurricaneLOL Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I don't know about you, but I think this is pretty ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 RAD's treaties...- PWN/PWNAGE (Pink Military/Economic BLOC) - MDoAP - Ragnarok - MDoAP - Poison Clan - MDP - The Centurion Brotherhood This might get interesting. A small number of pink compatriots might join in. Ragnarok? Please, they are rebuilding from the War, they are not going to spark off another major conflict over all this and that is what would happen if they jumped in to defend RAD's aggressive attack because RAD were indeed the first to attack thus there is no defensive clause in aiding RAD. Poison Clan? I think they had enough of set wars for awhile. They are raiders, they want to build their nations through war, not destroy them. TCB? Its just a defensive clause, to activate it would be to make yet another very dangerous precedent. The first war declaration was made by RAD, to some how e-lawyer their way into saying they are activating an MDP with RAD would basically be destroying the entire Aggression and Defensive differentiating clauses in ALL treaties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I believe the war will remain 1 v. 1, a rarity these days to be certain. Well, considering you have about 5 times as much NS and 5 times as many members, its not that even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elendil old Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Well, considering you have about 5 times as much NS and 5 times as many members, its not that even. Since when was Cybernations about even and fair wars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldie Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 ivan, were you guys in contact with their allied partners with your intentions? i think i can speak for almost everyone in cn that we're curious if treaty webs are going to have to get untangled tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoping Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 This is fun, been pretty boring the last few weeks. I wonder if The Jedi Order will get in on it or no. Now why would we even get anywhere near this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Petrovich4 Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I wouldn't get your hopes up. Lets hope cool - and sane I might add you - heads prevail. If they don't and RoK responds militarily, expect us to be at the Vanguard of that response. With popcorn. And toy light sabers. I call green. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ty345 Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Well, considering you have about 5 times as much NS and 5 times as many members, its not that even. Did you miss that little conflict over the summer? What was it called again, oh yeah, the Karma War. Look at those stats and then call this unfair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I suppose that as a Sith, I can admire their bloodlust, and their willingless to act upon it. But there is a time and a place for everything, and in this case, it has backfired against them. Of course, we in the NSO recognize the need for war in this instance but also temper that need, as usual, with some level of restraint. A time and place for everything? Restraint? Come on guys, unleash your emotions or some such. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stormsend Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Since when was Cybernations about even and fair wars? You saying that with your AA and a straight face was possibly the greatest thing I've ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperer fung shway Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 (edited) this is regarding Ivan Maldovis post earlier i dont feel like finding it and quoting it, something about asking to stop or some stuff well in this case it could have worked fine, this is not like many wars is it Edited August 15, 2009 by emperer fung shway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Logan Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 TCB? Its just a defensive clause, to activate it would be to make yet another very dangerous precedent. The first war declaration was made by RAD, to some how e-lawyer their way into saying they are activating an MDP with RAD would basically be destroying the entire Aggression and Defensive differentiating clauses in ALL treaties. It shouldn't really be an issue. All alliances have the option to do whatever the want right? They are only obligated to defend RAD. Didn't I see you arguing some point like that last week? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEWBert Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I have to say Ivan has gone insane w/ this. And while war is war, I hope RAD's allies even up this fight a bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryievla Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 (edited) Now why would we even get anywhere near this? Because one of your members was attacked as well? * edit to add link Edited August 15, 2009 by Kryievla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowbeast Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Poison Clan? I think they had enough of set wars for awhile. They are raiders, they want to build their nations through war, not destroy them.Oh really? I think they're a pretty honorable alliance and more likely to follow their treaty to the letter. At the very least I would expect them to try and see RAD through to the other side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 The Federated Allied Independence League hereby offers its full moral support to the New Sith Order in their just and right crusade against the Republic of Allied Defenses. Unfortunately we are currently caught up in other matters, so we can't really give you much more than that. Enjoy it anyway. We won't just support anyone you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted August 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Restraint is not historically the way of the Sith. What madness is this? Restraint is actually a hallmark of the Sith. Refraining today so that greater gains can be made tomorrow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flak attack Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Poison Clan? I think they had enough of set wars for awhile. They are raiders, they want to build their nations through war, not destroy them. I don't quite think you understand how PC thinks. PC raids for the sake of war, not for building their nations. PC raids nuclear nations just for the sake of getting nuked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Essenia Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 You saying that with your AA and a straight face was possibly the greatest thing I've ever seen. Uh, what he's saying has been NPO policy since day 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 I have to say Ivan has gone insane w/ this. And while war is war, I hope RAD's allies even up this fight a bit. That would be unfortunate wouldn't it... both alliances have allies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Moldavi Posted August 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 ivan, were you guys in contact with their allied partners with your intentions? i think i can speak for almost everyone in cn that we're curious if treaty webs are going to have to get untangled tonight. No. Why would we contact their allies? They attacked us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delta1212 Posted August 15, 2009 Report Share Posted August 15, 2009 Did you miss that little conflict over the summer? What was it called again, oh yeah, the Karma War.Look at those stats and then call this unfair. The odds on that were less than 2:1. These are 5:1. Uhh... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts