Doitzel Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 LOL.. I make ya deal. And its a good one.. I will come out of Peace Mode, thats no issue. I will fight your whole alliance happily, probably ZIing all of you myself.. but.. You have to give me something I want for wasting my time on you.. You gotta give me Sponge first... Then you gotta grow up big and strong again.. So I can attack you too.. Seriously, I will come outta peace and start the war with ya now, if I can that agreement.. Or I can tell you to shove your deal up your nose and laugh as you rot yourself in peace mode. Does it make you feel tough to threaten an alliance on permanent ZI? Almost as tough as you felt when you decided "war is not an option", I suppose? You boys don't know when to quit. I'm grateful. It makes my job so much easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trace Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 yes, i'm sure there is noWedge between the two of you. Oh....the pain...my head....owwwww Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krunk the Great Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) It does now. right Edited April 19, 2009 by krunkthegreat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Reverie Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 No doubt they're TEARing their clothes in anguish at having LOST this treaty. oh... you have to be more subtle than that. Now your on the level of the OP in bad puns... Although all of this play on words gives me a bigwoody. Also i think LOST is an alliance so you need to work on that. TEARing is present participle, while TORN is in the past. <--see what i did there. for example. I'm sure the canceled party is TORN up over this LoSS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Brendan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 yes, i'm sure there is noWedge between the two of you. Definitely the best pun of the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) unsurprising as they've canceled at most of your allies. Hey wheres mogar? OOC: I *do* sleep sometimes. Edited April 19, 2009 by Mogar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectre Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I am sorry to see this treaty get canceled. However, I do believe the cancellation was justified. o/ TORN Best of luck to you TORN in your endeavors, and hopefully LoSS and TORN may once again become friends in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sal Paradise Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 you have to be more subtle than that. I shall do nothing of the sort, sir. You have your puns how you like them, and I shall have mine how I like them. Good day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denial Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 No doubt they're TEARing their clothes in anguish at having LOST this treaty. oh... It's like the OP was written by Gene Shalit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneBallMan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 ...what?when did I say that you were the reason for TORN canceling? Perhaps you should re-read my statement as I had to re-read your post ten times just to make sure that you were accusing me of being devoid of logic and acuity while responding to a non-existent post... so... yeah... good luck with these delusions that I think you are the reason that TORN cancelled on LoSS. We all know why they did and the reasoning has nothing to do with OneBallMan. I am just totally shocked at the ego you must have to take that meaning away from my post. Like... wow... Anyway, good luck to LoSS and my allies in TORN. Huh? I think we are even in both greatly misinterpreting the other's post. I don't recall, nor can I see where I think that this had anything to do with me. I was referencing you chiding me for raising the issue of LoSS treaty suspension. I am a lot of things, but self-aggrandizingly delusional is not one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneBallMan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 hehe nice oneoneballman, the name also appears to be his erm.. special circumstance! so oneballman don't be so kranky, have an operation and soon after you are a twoballman you will love LoSS! I still love you all the same! Really. Other than that not making any sense logically, you are special in many, many ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingzog Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 We are TORN up over this huge LOSS and sad to see it go into the TRASH CAN. And thus TORN takes up where GOONS left off.... A 'brilliant political move' as the kids would say. Please continue to emulate them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
menakcherlock Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I wholeheartedly agree with the non-trolls here--- Its TORN's LOSS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wu Tang Clan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 And thus TORN takes up where GOONS left off....A 'brilliant political move' as the kids would say. Please continue to emulate them. TORN is no GOONS. At least GOONS was fun slightly entertaining to watch... On topic: Good luck to both alliances. I really mean that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) I wholeheartedly agree with the non-trolls here--- Its TORN's LOSS Really now? Are you trying to imply that the other side are trolls? Thats just...dumb. Edited April 19, 2009 by Sulmar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matthew Conrad Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 I have apparently overestimated Vox's intelligence. Laugh away I suppose..... Or perhaps you have grossly overestimated your own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wu Tang Clan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Really now? Are you trying to imply that the other side are trolls? Oh come on now, he didn't say that. He just said who wasn't being a troll. That was a stretch even for a stretch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
menakcherlock Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Just wish people would stop reading what isn't in this and making stuff up as they go along Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) Oh come on now, he didn't say that. He just said who wasn't being a troll. That was a stretch even for a stretch. He said that he agrees with the 'non-trolls', thus implying that the people who he isn't agreeing with are in fact trolling. I don't believe that is a stretch at all. If he didn't mean it like that, then fine, but that is what it came off to me as. Edited April 19, 2009 by Sulmar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tromp Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 (edited) Who was going to attack them if they weren't in peace mode? And NOW things are getting interesting... Come on man, what's with all this crap? Oh, and a cancelled treaty does not imply that you will be attacked. It's like you suffer from paranoia... Edited April 19, 2009 by Tromp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wu Tang Clan Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 He said that he agrees with the 'non-trolls', thus implying that the people who he isn't agreeing with are in fact trolling. I don't believe that is a stretch at all. No doubt. But he never gave even a hint of implication as to who he thought was trolling. Perhaps it was people who took it to more extreme measure either way. Or is being fair not acceptable to you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikz Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Announcement lacks any kind of class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
menakcherlock Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 Alliances cancel treaties when they no longer see eye to eye because of decisions that they do not want to be associated with.... TORN doesn't agree with LoSS anymore.....simple as that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New Frontier Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 LOL...didn't I tell you too stop annoying me or was that someone else?Besides the same could be said of your alliance. While Soldier's government may change and fluctuate, their commitment to their allies does not. The same can not be said of several other alliances I could mention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted April 19, 2009 Report Share Posted April 19, 2009 No doubt. But he never gave even a hint of implication as to who he thought was trolling. Perhaps it was people who took it to more extreme measure either way. Or is being fair not acceptable to you? I took the fact that he was supporting LoSS as evidence of which side he supported and which side he didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts