Gamemaster1 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I sincerely hope something comes of this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mergerberger II Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Penkala' timestamp='1282019870' post='2418793'] Remember what happened last time someone called them out? Yeah, me too. [/quote] I remember enjoying that pretty thoroughly as well. It is always nice to hit \m/. I'd do it again, definitely. Edited August 17, 2010 by Mergerberger II Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1282019878' post='2418794'] So Polar is willing to declare also, I like the sound of that. [/quote] We support STA no matter what, period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAAAAAAAAAGGGG Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I don't see what's so "honorable" about this. STA says anyone can still raid GGA according to [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90762&view=findpost&p=2418675]this[/url] as long as it isn't \m/. It's just a micro-embargo on \m/'s tech raiding abilities. Second: why do people actually care about GGA? Those that still fly that AA should have left it long ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomhower Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1282020053' post='2418800'] I am sorry, after reading the OP I thought this was an announcement for childish taunting, that was the tone you were after wasn't it? [/quote] No it was a warning. Do i need to rephrase that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Bravo, STA! \m/ have never been anything more than a nuisance - a thing that needed to be killed. Stomped. Crushed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashoka the Great Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Tygaland' timestamp='1282019508' post='2418775'] No, please go on... [/quote] Tyga, you guys have fallen for a joke. Seriously. A joke. My other comment was directed primarily at Pezstar, who essentially dared me to call the STA's honor into question over your support (or complete lack thereof) of the New Sith Order and your apparent 'paperless' treaty or whatever it is with them. As to this matter, though....I'm actually a bit surprised you didn't see \m/'s 'announcement' for what it really was. (Remember their 'demands' with regard to RED? It's basically along those lines....) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mergerberger II Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1282020352' post='2418820'] I don't see what's so "honorable" about this. STA says anyone can still raid GGA according to [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90762&view=findpost&p=2418675"]this[/url] as long as it isn't \m/. It's just a micro-embargo on \m/'s tech raiding abilities. Second: why do people actually care about GGA? Those that still fly that AA should have left it long ago. [/quote] That's true. And ironically, it also means that they are now working together to protect GGA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombie Glaucon Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='nippy' timestamp='1282018538' post='2418712'] This sentence makes no sense. "Most here" followed by a specific list of alliances that certainly do [b]not[/b] account for 'most here'. The rest of the sentence is incomprehensible gibberish. STA counter-protected GGA after \m/'s protection announcement. I assume you're claiming that \m/, PC, and GOONS aren't intelligent enough to grasp why STA would do such a thing? If that's what you're attempting, I suggest proofreading prior to submitting your post...you know, so you don't come off looking like a stray third-grader whom wandered into an adult conversation. [/quote] Might want to learn how "whom" works before getting chirpy about sentence structure. Anyhow, this thread is relevant to my interests. Verrrrry relevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukapaka Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) Edit: Turns out the whole [url="http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90766"]Kronos thing[/url] was a joke. Edited August 17, 2010 by Lukapaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conistonslim Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Rebel Virginia' timestamp='1282020014' post='2418798'] [color="#0000FF"]I salute the STA. I am not sure how much this means right now considering our situation, but the NSO has your back.[/color] [/quote]It means a lot my friend, one day we will repay our debt to you. Until then, when you peace out your wars my aid slots will be yours. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batallion Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Gamemaster1' timestamp='1282020291' post='2418813'] I sincerely hope something comes of this. [/quote] IRON's paying reps, is this for your viewing pleasure? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1282020352' post='2418820'] I don't see what's so "honorable" about this. STA says anyone can still raid GGA according to [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90762&view=findpost&p=2418675]this[/url] as long as it isn't \m/. It's just a micro-embargo on \m/'s tech raiding abilities. Second: why do people actually care about GGA? Those that still fly that AA should have left it long ago. [/quote] Exactly...one almost gets the notion that you figured it out in mid-type.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukapaka Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1282020352' post='2418820'] I don't see what's so "honorable" about this. STA says anyone can still raid GGA according to [url=http://forums.cybernations.net/index.php?showtopic=90762&view=findpost&p=2418675]this[/url] as long as it isn't \m/. It's just a micro-embargo on \m/'s tech raiding abilities. Second: why do people actually care about GGA? Those that still fly that AA should have left it long ago. [/quote] I don't think it's that they're morally opposed to tech raiding, or even tech raiding a disband alliance. Simply that announcing it, and pissing on their ashes isn't really cool, and should be frowned upon, via weapons. If \m/ didn't announce it, I doubt STA would be doing this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Cristof Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 People are begging for war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jrenster Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Man. Now I can't promise my war slots to STA because they're already being filled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClashCityRocker Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 oh wow, i just cant shake the feeling of a sickening deja vu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gamemaster1 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Batallion' timestamp='1282020477' post='2418829'] IRON's paying reps, is this for your viewing pleasure? [/quote] I don't see how that had anything to do with the topic at hand, but go on. Really. STA is doing something about this stunt of \m/'s, and I support it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebel Virginia Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='conistonslim' timestamp='1282020475' post='2418828'] It means a lot my friend, one day we will repay our debt to you. Until then, when you peace out your wars my aid slots will be yours. [/quote] [color="#0000FF"]What debt? As far as I'm concerned we still owe you something.[/color] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stefano Palmieri Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Gamemaster1' timestamp='1282020291' post='2418813'] I sincerely hope something comes of this. [/quote] As do I, however nothing will Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lennox Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 The NSO supports you in this endeavor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AAAAAAAAAAGGGG Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Lukapaka' timestamp='1282020567' post='2418832'] I don't think it's that they're morally opposed to tech raiding, or even tech raiding a disband alliance. Simply that announcing it, and pissing on their ashes isn't really cool, and should be frowned upon, via weapons. If \m/ didn't announce it, I doubt STA would be doing this. [/quote] Everyone is saying its an 'honorable' move. It's not. STA isn't protecting GGA, they're only protecting GGA from \m/. They're just starting a petty little battle with \m/, I mean - not that it matters a whole lot in the grand scheme of things. It's fine to raid a disbanded alliance, especially one that's been disbanded as long as GGA. And if there's an alliance that deserves to have their ashes pissed on, it's GGA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boomhower Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Stefano Palmieri' timestamp='1282021035' post='2418844'] As do I, however nothing will [/quote] If they know whats good for them nothing will but then again maybe we all just need a little fun... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confusion Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Stefano Palmieri' timestamp='1282021035' post='2418844'] As do I, however nothing will [/quote] You don't know that, It's \m/ we're talking about here. If this is anything like how the last war started... this might get interesting. Confusion. Edited August 17, 2010 by Confusion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shodemofi-NPO Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1282021105' post='2418847'] Everyone is saying its an 'honorable' move. It's not. STA isn't protecting GGA, they're only protecting GGA from \m/. They're just starting a petty little battle with \m/, I mean - not that it matters a whole lot in the grand scheme of things. It's fine to raid a disbanded alliance, especially one that's been disbanded as long as GGA. And if there's an alliance that deserves to have their ashes pissed on, it's GGA. [/quote] We're setting the record straight that claiming AA's as your personal hunting grounds isn't acceptable. That's what the "honorable move" bit is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.