Strykewolf Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 For what it is worth. The alliance of Blackhorse salutes the Syberian Tiger Alliance. Well done. We should talk, sometime. o/ STA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D34th Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1282023427' post='2418947'] Well actually we claimed sovereignty over the AA 24 hours before STA did, so they are the ones who will be launching a offensive war, think about it, think, [/quote] If you think that you have the sovereignty over the AA nice, ask someone in \m/ to raid [url="http://www.cybernations.net/nation_drill_display.asp?Nation_ID=409363"]this nation[/url], he has 3 war slots free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remaliat Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1282023427' post='2418947'] Well actually we claimed sovereignty over the AA 24 hours before STA did, so they are the ones who will be launching a offensive war, think about it, think, [/quote] Except your statement states that you will protect GGA nations from outside raids unless you give permission first. STA states they will protect the GGA nations from raids from \m/ members. Either way GGA nations are being protected. If you attack GGA nations you are violating STA's protectorate statement of GGA and thus would be commiting an aggressive attack. If they attack you in response to your attacks they are not violating your statement as they are not raiding the GGA nations. They are defending the GGA nations by attacking \m/ nations. It seems to me that you are still the aggressor should you continue attacks my friend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckz3 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Pyroman' timestamp='1282017527' post='2418645'] I doubt it would become precedent. Few alliances are despicable enough to do the same. [/quote] I guess you forget about Poison Clan? We're Evil and we punch babys ect. /me doddles off to do something more despicable then \m/ Edited August 17, 2010 by Duckz3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Remaliat' timestamp='1282024059' post='2418975'] Except your statement states that you will protect GGA nations from outside raids unless you give permission first. STA states they will protect the GGA nations from raids from \m/ members. Either way GGA nations are being protected. If you attack GGA nations you are violating STA's protectorate statement of GGA and thus would be commiting an aggressive attack. If they attack you in response to your attacks they are not violating your statement as they are not raiding the GGA nations. They are defending the GGA nations by attacking \m/ nations. It seems to me that you are still the aggressor should you continue attacks my friend. [/quote] That my friend is some fine logic you have there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Huh. I noted elsewhere in the \m/ thread concerning this matter that this "attacktorate" trend would be the root of some future conflict. Granted, I had hoped that, for an interesting spin, it might form a conflict out of competition for these nation-claims. Interesting to see this development instead. Let's hope this doesn't take the same course as the so-called BiPolar War (because reliving that idiocy isn't something anyone really wants). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TehChron Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1282024024' post='2418970'] No, you're the benchmark for being whiny morons that try and throw around other alliance's weight [/quote] Really? Mind explaining that one, I mean, Im all ears. But still, I'd like to hear about whos been throwing who's elses weight or whatnot with relation to this particular subject. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aeternos Astramora Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 STA's reputation: +5. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sulmar Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1282024024' post='2418970'] No, you're the benchmark for being whiny morons that try and throw around other alliance's weight [/quote] Really? I don't recall throwing around other people's weight. Thanks for caring though. Also, it is good to know that we are still better than \m/. Edited August 17, 2010 by Sulmar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corinan Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Chron' timestamp='1282024263' post='2418980'] Really? Mind explaining that one, I mean, Im all ears. But still, I'd like to hear about whos been throwing who's elses weight or whatnot with relation to this particular subject. [/quote] I predict that he starts blathering on about Frostbite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Banksy Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Good call STA. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manwe Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 I predict that the NSO tangent stops. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heggo Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='flak attack' timestamp='1282024024' post='2418970'] No, you're the benchmark for being whiny morons that try and throw around weight you don't have. [/quote] You're still mad I recruited from the GPA arentcha? [quote name='Ferrozoica Hive' timestamp='1282024249' post='2418979'] Huh. I noted elsewhere in the \m/ thread concerning this matter that this "attacktorate" trend would be the root of some future conflict. Granted, I had hoped that, for an interesting spin, it might form a conflict out of competition for these nation-claims. Interesting to see this development instead. Let's hope this doesn't take the same course as the so-called BiPolar War (because reliving that idiocy isn't something anyone really wants). [/quote] I suspect we've all learned our lesson in organization from that war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supercoolyellow Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 (edited) [quote name='Remaliat' timestamp='1282024059' post='2418975'] Except your statement states that you will protect GGA nations from outside raids unless you give permission first. STA states they will protect the GGA nations from raids from \m/ members. Either way GGA nations are being protected. [/quote] It all fits together to create perfect harmony [center][img]http://i819.photobucket.com/albums/zz112/supercoolyellow/Yin_Yang-2.gif[/img][/center] Edited August 17, 2010 by supercoolyellow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conistonslim Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Merrie Melodies' timestamp='1282023427' post='2418947'] Well actually we claimed sovereignty over the AA 24 hours before STA did, so they are the ones who will be launching a offensive war, think about it, think, [/quote]Enter the e lawyering, and really who gives a rats $@! about offensive or defensive blah blah blah. \m/ re engages and STA hits you. Simple enough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 Extremely Respectable STA. Much love for this action. Haven't decided to read all 12 pages, but i don't think i really should. Looks like all the other replies to every other topic lately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='conistonslim' timestamp='1282024641' post='2418990'] Enter the e lawyering, and really who gives a rats $@! about offensive or defensive blah blah blah. \m/ re engages and STA hits you. Simple enough? [/quote] I already covered that point. Feel free to move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='heggo' timestamp='1282024575' post='2418987'] I suspect we've all learned our lesson in organization from that war. [/quote] I seriously hope so. Then again, twisting things around into the pro-raider / anti-raider argument would fit with the general mob-mentality unthinking trend around here. Let's hope this leads to more interesting and dynamic times, as it were. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnCapistan Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Pyroman' timestamp='1282017527' post='2418645'] I doubt it would become precedent. Few alliances are despicable enough to do the same. [/quote] Despicable \m/e. I hope \m/ still raids GGA. GGA's an unprotected micro like all the rest so it's not like \m/ is violating any of its own laws. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lakerzz8 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Mr Damsky' timestamp='1282024985' post='2419000'] Despicable \m/e. I hope \m/ still raids GGA. GGA's an unprotected micro like all the rest so it's not like \m/ is violating any of its own laws. [/quote] Except, as of today, they're not an unprotected micro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='conistonslim' timestamp='1282024641' post='2418990'] Enter the e lawyering, and really who gives a rats $@! about offensive or defensive blah blah blah. \m/ re engages and STA hits you. Simple enough? [/quote] If its that certain why wait. I know, because neither of you are allowed to and this is all hot air. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='Mr Damsky' timestamp='1282024985' post='2419000'] Despicable \m/e. I hope \m/ still raids GGA. GGA's an unprotected micro like all the rest so it's not like \m/ is violating any of its own laws. [/quote] If i'm not mistaken i think GGA is being protected by STA from \m/ now, but hey, i might be confused about this topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegendoftheSkies Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='lakerzz8' timestamp='1282025016' post='2419001'] Except, as of today, they're not an unprotected micro. [/quote] Indeed, they are protected by \m/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Autumn Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1282025124' post='2419004'] Indeed, they are protected by \m/ [/quote] What an interesting definition of "protected". I'll note this down for future use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeRo1 Posted August 17, 2010 Report Share Posted August 17, 2010 [quote name='LegendoftheSkies' timestamp='1282025124' post='2419004'] Indeed, they are protected by \m/ [/quote] Actually that protection started the 15th, but i wouldn't really call that being protected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.