-
Content Count
11,557 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Aeternos Astramora
-
Rank
Argent MoW, Otter on IRC
- Birthday 11/30/1989
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
http://
-
ICQ
0
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Iowa City
Previous Fields
-
Nation Name
Astrum
-
Alliance Name
Argent
-
Resource 1
Aluminum
-
Resource 2
Uranium
Recent Profile Visitors
1,197 profile views
-
FYI, Argent is in the Polar coalition, although we only have 2 wars at the moment, so maybe that's why we're not included.
-
Do it again. First one to ZT loses.
-
Argent The Last Remnants 0.00 2,209.92 1 Woo! Go me!
-
Better spelling then? > [20:13:05] <@Lowsten[Argent]> mofo, this is my Administration now. I've already decided to offer you as a sacrafice sacrifice to enter Platysphere. Can we, or rather, they join your Platysphere now?
-
Argent leaks: [20:13:05] <@Lowsten[Argent]> mofo, this is my Administration now. I've already decided to offer you as a sacrafice to enter Platysphere. I've been thrown under the bus already.
-
Cool. I was mentioned by name.
-
TIO announcement regarding PNU
Aeternos Astramora replied to Partisan's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
Glad to hear it. -
TIO announcement regarding PNU
Aeternos Astramora replied to Partisan's topic in Alliance Announcements (IC)
GOONS [i]continuing[/i] to attack a protectorate of TIO? Sounds like an aggressive act to me. -
Many nations in Eq have been on the losing side of recent wars. Note the plural usage of "wars". To say that their current nations are weak because they haven't used the last 5 years to build a strong nation just doesn't follow.
-
This is representative of many DH posters, so I have one simply question. If this war leaves you in such a nice position, why didn't you use your nice position to win this war? Umbrella always had the majority of its allies on the other side relative to us. Yes, we fought with you guys twice through the oA clause on our MDoAP, but, for the most part, our FA paths were separate. Eventually, even if we had kept the treaty, we would have fought on opposite sides. (We did fight on opposite sides in Bipolar.) The fact is that, since both of our alliances were mainly upper tier (you
-
5 years? How is that an appropriate timescale in any sense? Alliances and coalitions change, and wars happen. Are you going to say Matt Miller is a terrible nation builder because of his tech level just got severely hurt this war?
-
The other thing is that, if we outnumber you 3 to 1, we can grow in overall tech 3 times faster than you. What's better: three 10K tech nations getting 3K teach each or one 15K tech nation getting 3K tech? Rebuilding and shifting foreign policies will be key to the next war. That and where it begins.