Mandrivia_2 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) I'm glad GATO is free, but it is clear that it was done out of fear. Edited April 16, 2009 by Mamaev II Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palpatine001 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) I AM FREE I AM FREE I AM FREE GATO IS FREE GATO IS FREE GATO IS FREE I find this rather ironic as I remember 2 days ago in another thread someone "challenged" us to ask the question 'Will someone in GATO ask for Freedom' - I did in a reply to that thread then left a nice quip on the way out Anyway yes we are free although what we and the rest of civilised CN society is not free from are those STINKING Trolls All I can say is, we are Free, thanks NPO (there have been a many a good times with those guys and thats not including Lossantos and SDRD pissing each other off Having SDRD around to piss lossantos off has been humorous at times and disastrous in others.I think in all, most people would agree, that whilst the situation was never a good thing and will never a good thing, the passing time was not such a terrible thing (bar a few unfortunate situations). There are very few people on in my time zone, so it has been good to have SDRD around to chat with and whilst we disagree on some things, its been fun. What JMK said I agree with As what the trolls think - Couldnt give a flying rats toss - although you do make wonderful entertainment Revenge - gonna be odd for a while without you guys - oh and unbanning your sorry backside from the IRC rooms - (Connection issues ) Edited April 16, 2009 by Palpatine001 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 very happy to see GATO freed, perhaps next FAN will be free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strudeldorf Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 I'm glad GATO is free, but it is clear that it was done out of fear. Oh, most definitely. NPO cares very much about what the CN Peanut Gallery thinks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
President Obama Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Oh, most definitely. NPO cares very much about what the CN Peanut Gallery thinks. Before this topic, I wasn't sure. Thanks for caring so much about public opinion NPO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogar Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Oh, most definitely. NPO cares very much about what the CN Peanut Gallery thinks. well.. you sort of *do*, so yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doitzel Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 You are comparing a mutual agreement on peace terms at the end of a war that GATO instigated to the butchering of children? It's difficult to take you seriously. Hyperbole is one thing but aren't you laying it on a bit thick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcraftmazter Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Really, permanent? Sure you don't want to rephrase? Considering that NPO attacked GATO because of a retarded surrender condition from a war that happened over a year ago at that stage, yes - I am sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeinousOne Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Oh, most definitely. NPO cares very much about what the CN Peanut Gallery thinks. Well, perhaps not directly but some other alliances seem to atleast think similiarly with what the Peanut Gallery that you refer to thinks and you most certainly care very much about what they think so indirectly NPO's recent decisions have been affected by the peanut gallery as you call the forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caliph Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Considering that NPO attacked GATO because of a retarded surrender condition from a war that happened over a year ago at that stage, yes - I am sure. You forgot the part where the person's action who gave them the CB wasn't even in GATo at the time, and was gone for months, making it an out dated CB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tator Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 about time u proved your point months ago and congrat gato Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alterego Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) Vox doesn't have to like the decisions GATO makes in order to support their right to make those decisions, my dear friend The difference between not likening the decision and the savage attack that has been sustained by GATO from over a dozen different alliances is substantial. I have only ever seen verbal attacks of this magnitude against an alliance during a time of bitter war. The message it sends is do it our way or else. Who's the evil empire now? Edited April 16, 2009 by Alterego Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jer Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Oh, most definitely. NPO cares very much about what the CN Peanut Gallery thinks. I hardly think that the CN Peanut Gallery cares what the NPO thinks, either. If it can bring your heinous practices to light in the eyes of your allies - who, I'd venture to say, may not be so ignorant as to deride public opinion out of hand - I think that is enough to make a difference, don't you? In fact, recent history shows that it really does not matter whether the NPO takes notice or not. Sorry about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Orpheus Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 It's difficult to take you seriously. Hyperbole is one thing but aren't you laying it on a bit thick? Without upholding the rule of law we are no better than the savage unaligned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Without upholding the rule of law we are no better than the savage unaligned. The savage unaligned huh, I wanna make sure I understand this, so The Revenge Doctrine that allows players to unaligned themselves on the Red Team with the backing of The NPO you consider savage ? I can keep going if you'd like. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 Without upholding the rule of law we are no better than the savage unaligned. What garbage Planet Bob blockbuster movie are you quoting here? I know I've heard this before, and I know GGA didn't make up something original... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Orpheus Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 The savage unaligned huh, I wanna make sure I understand this, so The Revenge Doctrine that allows players to unaligned themselves on the Red Team with the backing of The NPO you consider savage ? It is the peaceful gesture of a gracious civilization to extend the warm embrace of its protection to its more backwards brethren. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 It is the peaceful gesture of a gracious civilization to extend the warm embrace of its protection to its more backwards brethren. hahahaha, as Doitzel said your lying it on thick, however I like a good rper and your playing your role to perfection. I wish you were a women, that way I could assosiate your character with that loon ball Ann Coulter Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 (edited) I know GGA didn't make up something original... This guy has been strategically placed by someone. Edit for spelling error Edited April 16, 2009 by Freelancer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 It is the peaceful gesture of a gracious civilization to extend the warm embrace of its protection to its more backwards brethren. What about the Church of Maroon, which your alliance was instrumental in demolishing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Byron Orpheus Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 What about the Church of Maroon, which your alliance was instrumental in demolishing? What from I know of that incident (I had to dive into the history books), the Church of Maroon was unfortunate it that it was not clear enough in its objectives and through its ambiguity raised certain conflicts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freelancer Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 What from I know of that incident (I had to dive into the history books), the Church of Maroon was unfortunate it that it was not clear enough in its objectives and through its ambiguity raised certain conflicts. In English for our younger viewers It wasn't ran by the current power structure, so it had to go .. amirite Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragashingo Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 The difference between not likening the decision and the savage attack that has been sustained by GATO from over a dozen different alliances is substantial. I have only ever seen verbal attacks of this magnitude against an alliance during a time of bitter war. The message it sends is do it our way or else. Who's the evil empire now? All this whining over people disagreeing with GATO's decision is getting silly. I've seen no vicious attacks, disagreements sure, but nothing so bad as you speak of. Yeah, maybe one side is still trying to use GATO for political gain against NPO and allies, but there is another distinct side, that you seem to be part of, that is trying to blow disagreement over a puny PIAT into something it's not. Maybe both sides should just shut up about the PIAT and wait to see what GATO does next. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hizzy Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 What from I know of that incident (I had to dive into the history books), the Church of Maroon was unfortunate it that it was not clear enough in its objectives and through its ambiguity raised certain conflicts. But wouldn't the very essence of being a "backward brethren" and a "savage unaligned" imply that one already does not have a clear objective? Unaligned rulers have no clear objective, so why are they offered such gracious protection, while others had to die? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Janova Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted April 16, 2009 The Church of Maroon was very clear in its objectives, it was to protect unaligned nations from raiding – just like Revenge. Your alliances and its allies did not like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.