Mandrivia_2

Oh look, the two worst alliances in the game just signed a treaty. How precious.

Nice, did this suggestion finally change Admin's mind? :P

This is, hands, down, the best thread the OWF has seen in a long time. Each of Dajobo's points are viable, apart from the war chests, which nobody would be willing to get rid of. I personally would be willing to help compile a list of alliance descriptions as he pointed out. I might have missed the reasoning, but why can't two plus nations on the same IP not play the game if they do not aid, trade, war, not in same alliance etc. or interact with each other in any way?

Every major alliance is trying to turn their members into killing machines, but the pervasive trend you mentioned here continues. All that effort goes into fighting another alliance most of your members don't even hate for 2-3 months. I thought the RS-Guinness war had great potential for drama until the Guinness/NSF side fell apart a day in.

Hm yeah I didn't notice that until just now haha. It wasn't mean to be sarcastic though, just so you know GeniusInc. :)

Keep up the good work Genius, these news reports are amazing.

We're more than a 4 man alliance you know!

'Bout time.

Congratulations on the treaty.

This thread is more exciting than most global wars.

Given their actions to almost every other non-allied alliance at the time, that was a pretty stupid expectation to have.

Well, there is little else going on right now.

I can't remember exactly what the margin was. AFAIK the IAA had no rules as to how much majority a decision needed to pass. GATO fell under viceroyship for a year, and would have remained for longer if not for the Karma War.

IAA was a great alliance with an even great greater, close-knit community, and the only reason it died was due to its MDP with GATO, and the fact that NPO wished to kill two birds with one stone in that war. Tywin: No worries mate. I don't wish to get involved in your feud with Starfox right now since I like and respect both of you. I only wish to give facts wherever I remember them (which is few now, unfortunately).

To be fair, the entire IAA did vote to disband as well. Yes, this is coming from somebody who was also in the IAA at that time.

Why leave? Would it not take just a tiny bit more effort to join, say GPA, then pay bills and collect taxes once a week? If you feel the need to come back then at least your nation will still be there. It's always a shame to see old players leave.

Congrats to the newly elected officials! May I ask if it would not also be more expedient to have a shorter and concise charter? I'm not hating or anything, it just seems kind of wordy.

You mean democracy still exists in CN!!?? Congrats GPA!

While I may not agree with broadcasting this to all of CN, just remember Cynic, I am sure all of us would donate again if you need it. Good luck and go get your new home soon!

Isn't this whole thread about bringing stuff up from the past?

In response to the people saying that CyberNations needs a larger player base; I've noticed over the past two months or so that the steady haemorrhaging of players has stopped lately and the number of players seems to be staying about the same or even increasing. Whether this is due to the new rules or to more new players staying on, I don't know. As to Saxplayer's suggestion, maybe if all those little 10-20 member micro-alliances merged, they could become a contender as a larger alliance?

Maybe it's because nothing interesting happens anymore. Maybe because global wars are once a year, 3 month long trench-warfare style grudge matches that only end when one side's warchests become depleted. Maybe literally nothing interesting happens between those wars apart from everyone rebuilding their tech levels and warchests. ]

Lol, this war happened just after VE would not allow /b/'s surrender during GW3. Happy 7 years to you VE.

Our finest moment was definitely getting kingzog on the Red Senate

This is more interesting than the OWF most days. Good job.