ditchboy00 Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 Al Bundy once had 4 defeat alerts against the commies in a single day legend says. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 *just about always 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Le Trout Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 9 minutes ago, Master Hakai said: I do wha I want bish Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 14 minutes ago, Master Hakai said: Lets all just agree that fringelanding is the WORST Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Hakai Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 Fridgelining is trying their best, let’s go easy on em Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firingline Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 1 hour ago, SirWilliam said: Lets all just agree that fringelanding is the WORST You seem mad. Is it because you and your friends always end up losing to me in the most embarrassing possible ways? I will always be better than you, SW. The sooner you accept that the better off you will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirWilliam Posted September 16, 2023 Report Share Posted September 16, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thrash Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 (edited) 8 hours ago, ditchboy00 said: Al Bundy once had 4 defeat alerts against the commies in a single day legend says. I've done that to NPO multiple times. It is fun. Edited September 17, 2023 by Thrash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shwampy Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 (edited) Good to see that the LSF was the most capable army again. Dividing damage dealt by damage received shows the LSF did 20% more damage than received 💪 while the mighty wolves only managed a meagre 6% 🤡 LSF 208736.33 / 173101.85 = 1.21 UCR 904754.97 / 971846.67 = 0.93 SWF 54819.49 / 79080.50 = 0.69 COMECON 5358.84 / 16566.26 = 0.32 TW 1240595.28 / 1173669.63 = 1.06 Edited September 17, 2023 by shwampy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lyanna Mormont Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 On 9/16/2023 at 9:07 AM, Sabcat said: Don't be coy. NG needs to take their fare share of the credit. NG is as we always are, here to support our allies ❤️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabcat Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 6 hours ago, shwampy said: Good to see that the LSF was the most capable army again. Dividing damage dealt by damage received shows the LSF did 20% more damage than received 💪 while the mighty wolves only managed a meagre 6% 🤡 LSF 208736.33 / 173101.85 = 1.21 UCR 904754.97 / 971846.67 = 0.93 SWF 54819.49 / 79080.50 = 0.69 COMECON 5358.84 / 16566.26 = 0.32 TW 1240595.28 / 1173669.63 = 1.06 We've always been the best because we've never cared about infra or much of anything really. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrinkledStraw Posted September 17, 2023 Report Share Posted September 17, 2023 On 9/16/2023 at 11:27 AM, mrmarx said: Hilariously deluded babble. You should spread the wealth of communism around a bit, bud. Some of you had 14 billios in the bank. Some were literally out of money after a single round of war. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Bundy Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 On 9/16/2023 at 4:39 PM, ditchboy00 said: Al Bundy once had 4 defeat alerts against the commies in a single day legend says. Actually it was 5... hahaha Al Bundy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmansfield68 Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 Sad but necessary. Good show all around! * golf clap * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firingline Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 2 hours ago, AL Bundy said: Actually it was 5... hahaha Al Bundy Ahh, the night we landed like 9 defeat alerts on the commies in 40 seconds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Bundy Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 1 hour ago, firingline said: Ahh, the night we landed like 9 defeat alerts on the commies in 40 seconds. hahaha had some fun! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 Congratulations everyone involved for your peace/win/loss/however you call it. Thanks for the amusing variations over FL's name, gotta love polite irony, they made me smile. Nothing personal FL, I actually love your contributions to CN. Random reminder that 5 DAs in 14 seconds tell two things, at least: 1. Al is really quick with that mouse! 2. All of his opponents had very little or no soldiers at all, obviously. As the ruler of a nation that never has soldiers in the first place I'll certainly won't be the one making fun of #2. (In fact I'm absolutely qualified to explain why it may actually make a lot of sense, depending on the objectives one set for themselves.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firingline Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 4 minutes ago, jerdge said: As the ruler of a nation that never has soldiers in the first place I'll certainly won't be the one making fun of #2. (In fact I'm absolutely qualified to explain why it may actually make a lot of sense, depending on the objectives one set for themselves.) As a wise man once said: Quote BECAUSE YOU DONT TURTLE WHEN YOUR THE BUTT KICKER, YOU TURTLE WHEN YOU GETTING YOU BUTT KICKED.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Bundy Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 Just now, jerdge said: Congratulations everyone involved for your peace/win/loss/however you call it. Thanks for the amusing variations over FL's name, gotta love polite irony, they made me smile. Nothing personal FL, I actually love your contributions to CN. Random reminder that 5 DAs in 14 seconds tell two things, at least: 1. Al is really quick with that mouse! 2. All of his opponents had very little or no soldiers at all, obviously. As the ruler of a nation that never has soldiers in the first place I'll certainly won't be the one making fun of #2. (In fact I'm absolutely qualified to explain why it may actually make a lot of sense, depending on the objectives one set for themselves.) Although i don't agree with never having soldier, i want poke fun at the ones that do. I will however make fun of the ones that just quit fighting especially when two had a way greater tech advantages and one was fresh to the war haha. Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Bundy Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 Just now, firingline said: As a wise man once said: hahaha loving it haha Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franz Ferdinand Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 35 minutes ago, jerdge said: As the ruler of a nation that never has soldiers in the first place I'll certainly won't be the one making fun of #2. (In fact I'm absolutely qualified to explain why it may actually make a lot of sense, depending on the objectives one set for themselves.) Incorrect, you have 1,930,074 casualties, so historically you had soldiers at one point, most likely when starting out / building the nation when it was the 20/25% of all citizens should be soldiers phase. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerdge Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 33 minutes ago, firingline said: As a wise man once said: Quote BECAUSE YOU DONT TURTLE WHEN YOUR THE BUTT KICKER, YOU TURTLE WHEN YOU GETTING YOU BUTT KICKED.... If one's objective is to ensure that their opponents don't get any loot, and/or that they earn as few casualties as possible, and/or that they have as little fun as possible, having no soldiers is good practice. I'm in the first group, there's no way to earn any stat by attacking my nation. It makes sense to me, as I'm totally not interested in war and, according to my experience, most if not all high end raiders are absolute pixel huggers. There's basically no downside, either economically or tactically (I can declare war with no soldiers, if need be, and in fact I've done it in the past). Had I any inclination for war, things would be different, ofc. 33 minutes ago, AL Bundy said: Although i don't agree with never having soldier, i want poke fun at the ones that do. I will however make fun of the ones that just quit fighting especially when two had a way greater tech advantages and one was fresh to the war haha. Al Well I have no knowledge of your conflicts with those people, and the general situation you all were in, I'll just trust your judgement on them specifically. 2 minutes ago, Franz Ferdinand said: Incorrect, you have 1,930,074 casualties, so historically you had soldiers at one point, most likely when starting out / building the nation when it was the 20/25% of all citizens should be soldiers phase. Maybe half of them were collected in very old eras, in which warfare was very different and high end nations hadn't any easy way to profit over raids. My position in this world was also quite different. The other ones were collected mainly against Cuba. I don't have much to say about that conflict as my nation had been revived to defend the GPA, and it was being sat by someone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AL Bundy Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 10 minutes ago, jerdge said: Well I have no knowledge of your conflicts with those people, and the general situation you all were in, I'll just trust your judgement on them specifically. You are not a bad egg there jerdge haha! Al Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firingline Posted September 18, 2023 Report Share Posted September 18, 2023 56 minutes ago, jerdge said: If one's objective is to ensure that their opponents don't get any loot, and/or that they earn as few casualties as possible, and/or that they have as little fun as possible, having no soldiers is good practice. I'm in the first group, there's no way to earn any stat by attacking my nation. It makes sense to me, as I'm totally not interested in war and, according to my experience, most if not all high end raiders are absolute pixel huggers. There's basically no downside, either economically or tactically (I can declare war with no soldiers, if need be, and in fact I've done it in the past). Had I any inclination for war, things would be different, ofc. I understand what you're saying and understand why high-tier nations go without soldiers. That being said, there's plenty of tactical downsides to having no soldiers for the commies. For example, we were able to bleed Marx's entire warchest in 1v1's with defeat alerts. $6m per day is expensive. And it denies him the ability to do a significant portion of damage. Most wolves were fighting 1 on 3; he could easily take advantage. I think my casualty count this war (2 million per month) makes it clear that tactic isn't denying me any of what I want. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.