TIEIXIAIS Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 There is no basis to assume that. Not for me and then even more so not for you. You are some kind of a re roll. Well, I have been around too. Due to the memory of past am I disappointed in the present. For those that do not come from many years ago, this all might as well be a fine norm. But it is not for me. Things take too long and with age I lose patience. Are you referring to the time when rebuttals had substance, and the wars tact? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Letum Posted November 18, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Then why did NPO not just declare on us directly (if it is escalation you are seeking to entertain you?). The pace of this is as much a direct result of NPO actions as it is ours... Well, in general terms, you didn't end up being the point of escalation because you didn't have a situation where DS was able to "recognize a state of war" with you.If you had you wouldn't have faced NPO because we've picked a different front beforehand (partly because the 2007 part of me still feels uncomfortable signing any DoW on Polaris, hence the "picking a different front"). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zombie Glaucon Posted November 18, 2014 Report Share Posted November 18, 2014 Polar is in a war they can't win. How can it get any better? If we were in a war we could win? That sounds pretty good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mihail the Just Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Well, in general terms, you didn't end up being the point of escalation because you didn't have a situation where DS was able to "recognize a state of war" with you. If you had you wouldn't have faced NPO because we've picked a different front beforehand (partly because the 2007 part of me still feels uncomfortable signing any DoW on Polaris, hence the "picking a different front"). As I said - I have no problem about your route to war - it is pretty run of the mill from what I can see, and as you have explained it. Hope you're all enjoyin it though :popcorn: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlmightyGrub Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 If we were in a war we could win? That sounds pretty good. are we actually in a war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orville Reginbacher Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Well, in general terms, you didn't end up being the point of escalation because you didn't have a situation where DS was able to "recognize a state of war" with you. If you had you wouldn't have faced NPO because we've picked a different front beforehand (partly because the 2007 part of me still feels uncomfortable signing any DoW on Polaris, hence the "picking a different front"). I do love how the DoW here was, at least a plurality of it, about Polaris, and yet someone else was attacked instead of Polaris. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty of the Herm Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 I do love how the DoW here was, at least a plurality of it, about Polaris, and yet someone else was attacked instead of Polaris. There is a difference between contextualizing an action then the action itself, but apparently you can't understand the difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIEIXIAIS Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 I do love how the DoW here was, at least a plurality of it, about Polaris, and yet someone else was attacked instead of Polaris. NpO is at war with tech sellers. Whatchu talkin' bout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Let's face the fact that who is right or wrong will be decided by the outcome of the fighting, anything else is simply partisan bickering. Agreed. Expecting an alliance that is taking on the entirety of 'Aftermath' to go after NpO is absurd. On that note, DBDC seems to be doing well on their own. I don't believe that was aimed at NPO. Though, only Daj can confirm that. And yes, of course DBDC is doing well. Unfortunately, they won't have any targets soon, and the war will be de facto over between us. Well, in general terms, you didn't end up being the point of escalation because you didn't have a situation where DS was able to "recognize a state of war" with you. If you had you wouldn't have faced NPO because we've picked a different front beforehand (partly because the 2007 part of me still feels uncomfortable signing any DoW on Polaris, hence the "picking a different front"). I knew you loved us, Letum. :awesome: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 :popcorn: This partisan bickering is fun to watch Partisan bickering is always better when done in the form of interpretative dance. Unfortunately. I dance horribly. So instead I link horrible videos of doom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orville Reginbacher Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 (edited) NpO is at war with tech sellers. Whatchu talkin' bout. I was talking about NPO's declaration. It was pretty clear, I even quoted the person I was talking about in the thread which was the referenced DoW. Or at least I thought it was clear. My bad on any ambiguity. There is a difference between contextualizing an action then the action itself, but apparently you can't understand the difference. I believe I understood it perfectly. The Polar references were the context, which was the plurality, and then the action was against others that are not Polaris. That is what I commented about. I'm pretty sure we are on the same page here. Page 31. Edited November 19, 2014 by Orville Reginbacher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ayatollah Bromeini Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Umbrella and NPO signed a treaty, NPO attacks an NADC MCXA conglomerate.... what the fuck happened to this place ahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subtleknifewielder Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 Partisan bickering is always better when done in the form of interpretative dance. Unfortunately. I dance horribly. So instead I link horrible videos of doom. But dancing horribly is the point, how else will it be harnessed as a weapon of war? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilipT Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 If only we could just love each other and pick on micro-AA's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 (edited) I love you. You love me. I'ma kill the CCC with a nuke to the bunker and a cm to the head.. I'mma gonna fry them dead. :wub: Fighting Micros is fun.. because Dwarves are tasty when sauteed. Xantha's recipes for Dwarf are the best. Edited November 19, 2014 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wes the wise Posted November 19, 2014 Report Share Posted November 19, 2014 I love you. You love me. I'ma kill the CCC with a nuke to the bunker and a cm to the head.. I'mma gonna fry them dead. :wub: Fighting Micros is fun.. because Dwarves are tasty when sauteed. Xantha's recipes for Dwarf are the best. Give me somma what this guy is havin'. LOL No Surrender, Maelstrom ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KenMorningstar Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 If only we could just love each other and pick on micro-AA's. GET OFF MY LAWN!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
berbers Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 I love you. You love me. I'ma kill the CCC with a nuke to the bunker and a cm to the head.. I'mma gonna fry them dead. :wub: Fighting Micros is fun.. because Dwarves are tasty when sauteed. Xantha's recipes for Dwarf are the best. Is it wrong that I knew this was to the tune of Barney almost immediately? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhilipT Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 GET OFF MY LAWN!! But the lawn is the best part! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maelstrom Vortex Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 (edited) Must give my CCC target credit. He's trying so hard to nuke my scales off... Unfortunately my SDI crew have been paid overtime in advance and promised hazard pay :P And he ran out.. Edited November 20, 2014 by Maelstrom Vortex Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tongkzalot Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 at least he's trying :smug: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elegarth Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 I find it laughable Francoism is used to justify literally any Pacifican action, regardless of long term consequences. Support the illegal overthrow of Ivan Moldavi? Francoism. IO's run rampant while Moo goes insane? Francoism. Forcibly disband alliances that later form Vox Populi? Francoism. Piss off all their allies who go on to oppose them in Karma/Armageddon War? Francoism. It's repugnant to use Francoism as an explanation for every horrible leadership decision on the basis of material analysis. Yes, you can go on about how you use material analysis, that does not mean you have much of a track record of using it well. Oh Jesus, I can't believe you are still thinking yourself the holder of all Francoist truth. Truth of the matter is I know trained monkeys that know and understand Francoism better than you even hope to. I can't believe you have not yet realized that CN at large sees you as a walking / talking joke... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makalaure Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 lol. That is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geerland Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 Haha, Dajabo you have fallen so far. For all of the talking and back and forth that has gone on, and the end of the day this is not Pacifica's war. Whilst some may like to claim that, this war did not originate from us, and was not of our making. However, the origin of this war (DoomSquad) are allied to multiple allies of ours, so to support our allies you see this declaration. Putting it quite simply, as this is not our war why the hell would be jump face first into one of the very few alliances on "the other side" that is actually capable of not shooting themselves in the foot during warfare, when there is a nice squishy target in SNX and aftermath in general who have in the past proved themselves to be generally pretty lousy at this whole war thing.As for the Umbrella treaty, a lot of work went into that thing, over a long time. It was just rather convenient how the timing worked out, as it made this entry somewhat simpler and more clean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starfox101 Posted November 20, 2014 Report Share Posted November 20, 2014 (edited) Haha, Dajabo you have fallen so far. For all of the talking and back and forth that has gone on, and the end of the day this is not Pacifica's war. Whilst some may like to claim that, this war did not originate from us, and was not of our making. However, the origin of this war (DoomSquad) are allied to multiple allies of ours, so to support our allies you see this declaration. Putting it quite simply, as this is not our war why the hell would be jump face first into one of the very few alliances on "the other side" that is actually capable of not shooting themselves in the foot during warfare, when there is a nice squishy target in SNX and aftermath in general who have in the past proved themselves to be generally pretty lousy at this whole war thing. As for the Umbrella treaty, a lot of work went into that thing, over a long time. It was just rather convenient how the timing worked out, as it made this entry somewhat simpler and more clean. You are defending allies by launching an aggressive war with no CB? I mean, the kool aid in Pacifica has always been strong, but perhaps you shouldn't have used the entire winter stock in one go. Edited November 20, 2014 by Starfox101 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.