Tick1 Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 The matter at hand is this: You stated the following in the post here: You have made an assertion that you have not supported when Rush challenged you on the assertion you made of him . You have yet to provide evidence of that assertion. Put up or shut up. Trying to hideaway by using diversionary means does not work. I only need to provide the evidence if I want to be right. So keep going off topic, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leongsh Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 (edited) I only need to provide the evidence if I want to be right. So keep going off topic, Effectively, you can't put up. Edited November 24, 2013 by leongsh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 (edited) Effectively, you can't put up. Effectively I'd rather not search the forums from 8 months ago to prove him wrong. Edit: As I said 4 posts ago, but thanks for dragging this conversation out for no reason. Edited November 24, 2013 by Tick1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Warrior Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 (edited) i'd rather get rolled every war until the apocalypse than treaty an alliance as !@#$%* as yours or iron Oh good, so we're in agreement then. We'd rather if this happened too. Edited November 24, 2013 by The Warrior Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hereno Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Oh good, so we're in agreement then. We'd rather if this happened too. Really? A "no u"? That's the best you could do? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shan Revan Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Really? A "no u"? That's the best you could do? IRON members are notoriously bad posters. Is it really a surprise? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onbekende Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Am I a bad poster Shan? :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Oh good, so we're in agreement then. We'd rather if this happened too. 95% of CN members don't want a treaty with NSO either. IRON members are notoriously bad posters. Is it really a surprise? Thanks for founding a community of bad posters then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MCRABT Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 95% of CN members don't want a treaty with NSO either. Thanks for founding a community of bad posters then. Someone had to ensure you weren't lonely in this world. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beauty Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Someone had to ensure you weren't lonely in this world. Well I thank him for caring for me. o/ Shan Revan Also enjoy NG, MCRABT. I'll give you a call when I need some tech sellers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shan Revan Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 (edited) Thanks for founding a community of bad posters then. It didn't start out as bad posters. It just happened sometime when I wasn't looking, and then it was too late. Am I a bad poster Shan? :D I don't think I've seen that sig since 2006. Nostalgia. But yes, you're a bad everything. EDIT: For what it's worth IRON,I do hope you succeed. Whether I agree with the course or not. So Goodluck. Sorta. Edited November 24, 2013 by Shan Revan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Third King Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 I don't know what we're missing most over here Shan, your frankness, historical perspective, or dancing avatar. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onbekende Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 I don't think I've seen that sig since 2006. Nostalgia. But yes, you're a bad everything. Its why I keep it, never had another one. Not that I post alot here anyway :D bad at everything o/ I don't know what we're missing most over here Shan, your frankness, historical perspective, or dancing avatar. the dancing avatar, offcourse :D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dvdcchn Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 wow Shan and betsy posting on here, it is a nostalgic day indeed! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordSlop Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Im not real sure where you get the "rolling over" thing from. Did you guys find 5 targets above 100K NS who all seem to be AFK ? Yep. Too bad for them. There are literally 5 of 90 guys not fighting back, you and Ronnie seem to have found 3 of them yourselves. Our damage differential is 380K right now (380K more received than done)... the damage the 5 nations not fighting back have taken (and that is there own fault, to be frank, they deserve what they get) is 274K. You wont find too many other guys engaging any of our nations who think we are "rolling over".... As for damage ratio (even with our sad 5, which I will forever call them, until they fix themselves), we are almost exactly the same ratio as your friends in Mortal Wombat. Are your allies rolling over? (no , they are not, I will answer that for you.) Perspective is a funny thing based on the side you are on. Perspective can also be a fleeting thing. If our sad 5 had gone to PM (which was there order because they said they were unable to be around), we wouldnt be having this roll over conversation. There is a difference between rolling over and being AFK. Id rather they were rolling over, tbh. I must be lucky I got the 4th then. And no, mine isn't inactive, just plain incompetent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pingu Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 Am I a bad poster Shan? :D By present OWF standards, you're practically Shakespeare. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted November 24, 2013 Report Share Posted November 24, 2013 (edited) I must be lucky I got the 4th then. And no, mine isn't inactive, just plain incompetent. "I got an incompetent guy, this must be what the whole alliance is like"... Someone literally says this in a roundabout way every war, about every alliance... EVER. I just had to come back and edit this after looking at your one war with our "incompetent" guy. Lets see the tale of the tape: Lord Slop Aluur Soldiers Lost: 18,089 24,169 Tanks Lost: 1,762 1,902 Aircraft Lost: 50 43 Infrastructure Lost: 220.13 287.22 Technology Lost: 68.01 42.49 Land Lost: 177.664 293.563 Land/Tech/Infra: 1,266.91 Strength Lost 1,514.46 Strength Lost So.. let me get this straight. You are a marvelous Viridian Warrior. Fighting an incompetent wastelander. And you are just SMASHING him by a whopping 240 NS. Oh and you lost more Tech? I am not sure exactly what point you were trying to make. But rest assured, it was dumb. And though he wont say it in public, Goldie knows you were dumb too. Oh.. and did I mention you have 3K more tech than him? Yeah, those stats sure do make him look "incompetent." Edited November 24, 2013 by Rush Sykes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vandal Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 The butthurt is strong in here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnGulager Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 The butthurt is strong in here. Im quite suprised caps cruise control hasnt been engaged. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angryraccoon Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 Shows how little you know since I supported that decision in FoB since Athens actually had balls back then. I still think the Knights of Ni raid was good on multiple levels. It was also a good time for drama. I posted on their forum over a week ago with no response. Might be about time to wake them up with another raid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tick1 Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 I still think the Knights of Ni raid was good on multiple levels. It was also a good time for drama. I posted on their forum over a week ago with no response. Might be about time to wake them up with another raid. It was good on so many levels, that defunct M*A*S*H treaty that KoN thought was still active. Good times Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordSlop Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 (edited) "I got an incompetent guy, this must be what the whole alliance is like"... Someone literally says this in a roundabout way every war, about every alliance... EVER. I just had to come back and edit this after looking at your one war with our "incompetent" guy. Lets see the tale of the tape: Lord Slop Aluur Soldiers Lost: 18,089 24,169 Tanks Lost: 1,762 1,902 Aircraft Lost: 50 43 Infrastructure Lost: 220.13 287.22 Technology Lost: 68.01 42.49 Land Lost: 177.664 293.563 Land/Tech/Infra: 1,266.91 Strength Lost 1,514.46 Strength Lost So.. let me get this straight. You are a marvelous Viridian Warrior. Fighting an incompetent wastelander. And you are just SMASHING him by a whopping 240 NS. Oh and you lost more Tech? I am not sure exactly what point you were trying to make. But rest assured, it was dumb. And though he wont say it in public, Goldie knows you were dumb too. Oh.. and did I mention you have 3K more tech than him? Yeah, those stats sure do make him look "incompetent." Is measuring how much NS destroyed 2 days into a war how you measure results? Or is it sustainability? For plain decency, I will not publish spy reports here. But I recommend you ask your team-mate why he hasn't purchased anything since the 20th despite being active. Is this the sort of war-preparedness TLR encourages these days? Edit: As for the actual NS loss, I'm not the one nuking this one, do the math Edited November 25, 2013 by LordSlop Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hartfw Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 I was led to believe this thread would not have math, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush Sykes Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 Is measuring how much NS destroyed 2 days into a war how you measure results? Or is it sustainability? For plain decency, I will not publish spy reports here. But I recommend you ask your team-mate why he hasn't purchased anything since the 20th despite being active. Is this the sort of war-preparedness TLR encourages these days? Edit: As for the actual NS loss, I'm not the one nuking this one, do the math Spy reports? Having a bad warchest can be attributed to many factors. You SPECIFICALLY pointed out and called him incompetent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordSlop Posted November 25, 2013 Report Share Posted November 25, 2013 Spy reports? Having a bad warchest can be attributed to many factors. You SPECIFICALLY pointed out and called him incompetent. Is that what you call a warchest? Well, I suppose we all call different things, different names, in different regions of the world. Where I come from they call what he has 2 days of bills. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.