Dagrr Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303094920' post='2692232'] Have you seen the amount of nations we have below 40k compared to Legion? [/quote] You are aware that all of CnG is already at war with Legion surely? Not enough nations for you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xoindotnler Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4237780/girl%20training%20dog.gif[/img] "Thats a good boy." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 BTW, I have been told they are still in war with NADC and as such its not escalation. So TOP brings on a new front, way to split hairs and be disingenuous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 "Hey guys, we just agreed on terms, let's get another alliance to attack now! teehehehehe!" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Trail Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 Good luck. Happy shooting.... well what you can hit anyway Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandroff Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303094920' post='2692232'] Glad to fight another alliance with you guys, thanks :> Have you seen the amount of nations we have below 40k compared to Legion? And to anybody complaining about attacking during talks. These talks have been going on for how long now? (hint, about a month) We're not going to sit idle while you guys take that long to keep countering us. [/quote] Have you seen the amount of nations TOP has below 40k to help with those Legion nations? About 50 to Legion's 200(Roughly). Not to mention all of the CnG nations already on Legion. Last I checked Legion was busy barely attacking you. Edited April 18, 2011 by Gandroff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkerNinja Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Janosik' timestamp='1303095142' post='2692240'] STAND BACK I got this. [/quote] Ball hog. [quote name='Letum' timestamp='1303095144' post='2692241'] What, precisely, is the point of attacking an alliance you can barely even fight, in the midst of it finalizing a peace deal? You can do limited damage, and cannot really effect the outcome of any peace. [/quote] We don't get why you stay in peacemode, and you don't get why we declare on nations in peacemode. We both have our secret strategies. Let's see which one prevails. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baltus Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 Good Luck TOP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceknave Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 o/ TOP? Guess you're pre-emp'ing the resolution of peace talks, eh? Hi, Baldr! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 The simple fact of the matter is that after talking tough for over 2 months, now that MK is facing the 21 more days of war with NPO's top tier that they have been demanding, they are backing away and doing everything they can to make sure they have to fight as few people as possible in those 21 days. Real tough Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kencojenko Posted April 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 We were asked to come in. We'll hit what we can, honor our treaty and then leave, like we have everywhere else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 I find it funny how people are getting indignant about this because it's "not necessary" like it's supposed to be a big deal or result in some major action. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='kencojenko' timestamp='1303095529' post='2692257'] We were asked to come in. We'll hit what we can, honor our treaty and then leave, like we have everywhere else. [/quote] TOP always was great at soaking up damage for whoever's in charge, you're right about that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Levistus Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 This is to set up some awesome ghost chain where Legion is forced to attack itself, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drai Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Gandroff' timestamp='1303095374' post='2692250'] Have you seen the amount of nations TOP has below 40k to help with those Legion nations? About 50 to Legion's 200(Roughly). Not to mention all of the CnG nations already on Legion. Last I checked Legion was busy barely attacking you. [/quote] So you are saying those 50 nations aren't useful? I don't get where you're going with that. 50 is significant against 200 nations. (I guess this is a response to Henry as well): There were still open slots, obviously a lot of nations are inactive/busy with rl and unable to declare right now. TOP had resources available to help, I don't see a problem with them joining. If you're going to bring up the peace talks to argue that I'll just repeat how ridiculously long they've been going on for due to the countering of terms. Edited April 18, 2011 by Drai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkerNinja Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 (edited) [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1303095594' post='2692261'] TOP always was great at soaking up damage for whoever's in charge, you're right about that. [/quote] Pay no attention to the Grand Master. In reality we loathe Legion and have developed new peace-mode-penetrating technology. We wish to test it on a peripheral target before deploying it on a larger scale. Fear us. Edited April 18, 2011 by WalkerNinja Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='WalkerNinja' timestamp='1303095773' post='2692266'] Pay no attention to the Grand Master. In reality we loathe Legion and have developed new peace-mode-penetrating technology. Fear us. [/quote] The man who turned the ADN into NPO's lapdog steps up to bat . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brehon Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 Its simple, the new front wasn't necessary. What will actually change in the war... not a whole lot. But this really shows that Doomhouse et al (and specifically MK) is looking to be disingenuous. The insurance clause you asked for now looks merely to be a reason to not work out peace so this little middle finger you all have tossed out proves it. NPO nations totally 1.8m NS out of peace mode and 2.475 billion from the coalition wasn't a reason to not pull this type of act. We can see the real intent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epiphanus Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1303095472' post='2692256'] The simple fact of the matter is that after talking tough for over 2 months, now that MK is facing the 21 more days of war with NPO's top tier that they have been demanding, they are backing away and doing everything they can to make sure they have to fight as few people as possible in those 21 days. Real tough [/quote] I don't really think you think before you post. The nations TOP will be hitting at present (as most of their alliance is still cowering in peace mode) are not ones that MK's top tier could be using against he NPO's upper tier. P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NLights Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 I'm already in love with this thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gandroff Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303095738' post='2692265'] So you are saying those 50 nations aren't useful? I don't get where you're going with that. 50 is significant against 200 nations. (I guess this is a response to Henry as well): There were still open slots, obviously a lot of nations are inactive/busy with rl and unable to declare right now. TOP had resources available to help, I don't see a problem with them joining. If you're going to bring up the peace talks to argue that I'll just repeat how ridiculously long they've been going on for due to the countering of terms. [/quote] So you're saying that because it takes a long time for many alliances to agree on anything that those discussions are now irrelevant? No matter how you say it, you "changed targets" in the middle of peace talks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kencojenko Posted April 18, 2011 Author Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1303095594' post='2692261'] TOP always was great at soaking up damage for whoever's in charge, you're right about that. [/quote] Tomato, Tomato. You see this is us being lapdogs, we see this as honoring a treaty we signed that happens to go both ways. When we decide we want put someone over a barrel, MK will be happy to provide the barrel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Azaghul Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Brehon' timestamp='1303095923' post='2692271'] Its simple, the new front wasn't necessary. What will actually change in the war... not a whole lot. But this really shows that Doomhouse et al (and specifically MK) is looking to be disingenuous. The insurance clause you asked for now looks merely to be a reason to not work out peace so this little middle finger you all have tossed out proves it. NPO nations totally 1.8m NS out of peace mode and 2.475 billion from the coalition wasn't a reason to not pull this type of act. We can see the real intent. [/quote] As I said: [quote name='Azaghul' timestamp='1303095572' post='2692260'] I find it funny how people are getting indignant about this because it's "not necessary" like it's supposed to be a big deal or result in some major action. [/quote] Y'all are reading too much into this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schattenmann Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 (edited) [quote name='kencojenko' timestamp='1303096021' post='2692276'] Tomato, Tomato. You see this is us being lapdogs, we see this as honoring a treaty we signed that happens to go both ways. When we decide we want put someone over a barrel, MK will be happy to provide the barrel. [/quote] All of TOP's treaties seem to go two ways until things go south. Edited April 18, 2011 by Schattenmann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WalkerNinja Posted April 18, 2011 Report Share Posted April 18, 2011 [quote name='Schattenmann' timestamp='1303095839' post='2692268'] The man who turned the ADN into NPO's lapdog steps up to bat . . . [/quote] Thanks for that history lesson, old man Schatt. What's next, "I used to be in Vox, everyone should listen to me!" It's been a couple of hours since that one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.