Jump to content

Gandroff

Members
  • Posts

    88
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Gandroff

  1. [quote name='D34th' timestamp='1349668128' post='3038495'] While all this Francoism talks make me feel nostalgic(in a good way) it also bores me a lot. Brings Vladimir back, he did it better than you(no offense intended). [/quote] Apologies for not keeping you entertained good sir. How could we forget that we're here only to entertain you? We'll try not to fail you in the future.
  2. [quote name='kingzog' timestamp='1343200055' post='3014947'] Oh, didn't you know? According to NPO lore, all of the data is entered manually. If it were actually taken directly from servers, it would be a violation of Admin's Holy Laws. But it isn't. All entered manually. Yup, manually. In other news, I have a bridge to sell. [/quote] You really like to beat this dead horse don't you? It's against the ToS to have a bot automatically pulling the information out. Our system was reviewed by Admin and everything we do is perfectly legal.
  3. [quote name='NationRuler' timestamp='1339643213' post='2982641'] NPO invented warlord dominated anarchy [/quote] No, no, no. We invented warlord dominated order. It's completely different.
  4. [quote name='NoMercy' timestamp='1334390450' post='2952976'] 1. Well traditionally the BR has very little say in the business. I am not sure if the information policy in NPO has changed, I doubt it. So yes, there is the danger they have never stopped giving you one-sided information. You guys all know that better than me, you are invited to correct me. However the posts I quoted strongly suggest that I am right. [/quote] I'll just let you assume that the BR doesn't get information from us. That being the case, has anyone ever considered that the BR trusts us to make the right decisions and if they do disagree with something they know enough to keep their disapproval out of the public's sight? At the end of the day it's your choice to believe whatever you want and i'm not going to sit here and argue with you about it but there's something to think about. As for your second point Brehon said everything I would have.
  5. [quote name='NoMercy' timestamp='1334388212' post='2952924'] Body Republic copy/pastes NPO standard answers, probably right from Brehons pen. Please enlighten us with something more valuable. [/quote] So we're back to the brainwashed BR days then? I miss those. They were entertaining. [quote name='NoMercy' timestamp='1334389329' post='2952945'] Also that NPO still tries to dictate other people's treaties is hilarious. [/quote] How are we dictating anything? We don't agree with the path they want to take so we have split ways. Dictating would be threatening them in some way to do something we wanted.
  6. [quote name='Triyun' timestamp='1312591980' post='2772998'] Maybe not the Former IO you intended the question to, but doubtful. Especially when you consider the current Emperor coined the term coalition of cowards. [/quote] Now Triyun, I know you were doing our FA before Karma happened. I'm dissapointed. Sparta had canceled our treaty before Karma actually started, so they were never one of the "Coalition of Cowards."
  7. [quote name='fudgey rodney' timestamp='1311748390' post='2764918'] Was your head held high when you stabbed your closest brothers in the back and left them hang to be beatin? The name is not new, was a lowly boy hangin out in the ranks... [/quote] Oh, you're one of those people. That's funny. You claim to know what you're talking about but you have no idea whatsoever.
  8. Good luck with all of that. I'll be waiting for your "pain."
  9. It was an honor to fight alongside all of you. o/ [quote name='Kalasin' timestamp='1307319239' post='2724650'] herp derp. there's nothing remotely funny about baby jokes. i mean, it wasn't even funny the first time, but now it's *really* overkill. [/quote] When we want your opinion we'll ask for it. Just don't hold your breath.
  10. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1303532990' post='2697421'] Could you specify which were mistakes then? We're having a discussion over the validity of this on irc. [/quote] Now I don't want to spoil it for all of you, where would be the fun in that?
  11. [quote name='Cager' timestamp='1303531836' post='2697385'] I'm calling this was written by Brehon. [/quote] You would be wrong. That said, i'll shake the hand of whoever put that much time into writing this. You made a good couple mistakes trying to make this look like it was from us, but overall it's impressive.
  12. [quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303096229' post='2692281'] I don't think so. I'm saying you should be either: - putting in more effort to speed things up - or if the 'coalition' approach to peace talks is taking this long then let each alliance work out peace terms separately (at least the money/tech portion which is every alliance but NPO afaik) while still keeping each other in the loop if you wish I'm not sure what you meant by changing targets comment so I can't respond to that. [/quote] You're making a huge assumption here when you say we're not putting in effort. Both sides of this discussion have been "lacking in effort" if that is what you want to say is going. I'm just going to leave it there. Our current method is how we want to go about it and we will continue to go about it that way. Changing targets, rather than escalating, is what we were told you were doing when we asked what was going on, which we all agreed would not happen. It seems like the same thing to me personally.
  13. [quote name='Epiphanus' timestamp='1303095936' post='2692272'] I don't really think you think before you post. The nations TOP will be hitting at present (as most of their alliance is still cowering in peace mode) are not ones that MK's top tier could be using against he NPO's upper tier. P [/quote] The same can be said about you. He said that TOP is being used to reduce the possibility that when our nations leave peace mode Legion's could come with us.
  14. [quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303095738' post='2692265'] So you are saying those 50 nations aren't useful? I don't get where you're going with that. 50 is significant against 200 nations. (I guess this is a response to Henry as well): There were still open slots, obviously a lot of nations are inactive/busy with rl and unable to declare right now. TOP had resources available to help, I don't see a problem with them joining. If you're going to bring up the peace talks to argue that I'll just repeat how ridiculously long they've been going on for due to the countering of terms. [/quote] So you're saying that because it takes a long time for many alliances to agree on anything that those discussions are now irrelevant? No matter how you say it, you "changed targets" in the middle of peace talks.
  15. [quote name='Drai' timestamp='1303094920' post='2692232'] Glad to fight another alliance with you guys, thanks :> Have you seen the amount of nations we have below 40k compared to Legion? And to anybody complaining about attacking during talks. These talks have been going on for how long now? (hint, about a month) We're not going to sit idle while you guys take that long to keep countering us. [/quote] Have you seen the amount of nations TOP has below 40k to help with those Legion nations? About 50 to Legion's 200(Roughly). Not to mention all of the CnG nations already on Legion. Last I checked Legion was busy barely attacking you.
  16. [quote name='AAAAAAAAAAGGGG' timestamp='1300341638' post='2667241'] You do realize a good majority of NPO's upper tier was in peace mode before Doomhouse + FAN declared on them, correct? [/quote] Last I checked 70(Over the entire alliance) wasn't a good majority. I'll also echo Schattenmann here.
  17. [quote name='Banksy' timestamp='1300074231' post='2664054'] FAN, ask them to do a backflip now. [/quote] You guys need to be less predictable. It's not even fun anymore.
  18. [quote name='Caliph' timestamp='1300073114' post='2664026'] Good faith? Dear sir, "good faith" would have been for NPO to apologize to FAN just after Karma, not while being smashed by FAN and Doomhouse. [/quote] Yes, yes. We discussed the timing of it being not exactly great while at war but decided it needed to be done. They can take it how they will.
  19. [quote name='Caliph' timestamp='1300002874' post='2662692'] Meh, years too late. Good first step, but there needs to be a lot more done for us to see this as being sufficient for the 2 years of war you put them through. And it wasn't just 2 years of war, it was constant insults, and you used every opportunity to bait them into coming out and fighting on your terms. Now the tables are turned, and you see what its like now. [/quote] That's the thing, it doesn't matter what you think. This specific topic is a show of good faith for the apology between us and FAN.
  20. [quote name='TypoNinja' timestamp='1300001575' post='2662654'] The consistent and irrational hate aimed at everybody who's ever left NPO is also a great indicator of Pacifician Character to the rest of us. [/quote] Everyone? Most certainly not. We don't exactly get along with those that immediately turn around and chastise us for the things they supported not X days/weeks/months ago, though. I get along quite well with most ex-members that stay away from doing that.
  21. [quote name='maskofblue' timestamp='1299997091' post='2662537'] At no point in history has NPO expressed any sympathy, remorse, or regret for what happened with FAN. In the beginning it was a calculated move for their own power. In the months and years that followed, they continued to do everything in their power to strangle the life out of them. [/quote] You say that like you weren't around for all of it and supporting it.
  22. [quote name='Muddog' timestamp='1299989736' post='2662337'] Mr. Pansy, you may be right, but if you are that means the apology wasn't the first thing they tried and it didn't start out publicly. [/quote] Then he continues to be right.
×
×
  • Create New...