Jump to content

57th Overlanders DoW's BC 2.0


Kodiak

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 337
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Excuse me? Picked a bad time to be opportunistic, Veneke. A very, very bad time.

You know I realize you're close with them and all, but yeah, no.

Where was Nemesis even mentioned?

My bad dawg it appears I'm just better informed than you as per usual.

Keep on keeping on.

Edited by Cairna
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were planning on hitting you without a treaty, during a potential global war where there are two giant sides. God, are you more blind to context that people who supported the CB against TPF? You're pretty much enemies anyway, they're going to hurt directly or indirect. It all boils down to the same.

In the past, I berated Dark Fist for jumping on NEW without a treaty, but I have sense changed my mind. It's 1 gigantic side vs the other, who cares about frivolous treaties in that situation.

Edit: Also, bad show 57th.

Edited by FreddieMercury
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that's called accepting information, which as we learned from the Karma war, is the same thing.

I don't think the CB of other independent alliances sets precedent for every alliance. The 57th wasn't the one who started karma because their enemies accepted information, they're not being hypocrites etc. So, I don't see how that's a legitimate example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were planning on hitting you without a treaty, during a potential global war where there are two giant sides. God, are you more blind to context that people who supported the CB against TPF? You're pretty much enemies anyway, they're going to hurt directly or indirect. It all boils down to the same.

In the past, I berated Dark Fist for jumping on NEW without a treaty, but I have sense changed my mind. It's 1 gigantic side vs the other, who cares about frivolous treaties in that situation.

Edit: Also, bad show 57th.

So the fact that they would have used a global war to hide their opportunism in hitting their "rivals" makes it ok?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...